Modular-based gradient scaffold design and experimental studies for tissue engineering: enabling customized structures and mechanical properties
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. Entezari A, Roohani I, Li G, Dunstan CR, Rognon P, Li Q, Jiang X, Zreiqat H (2019) Architectural design of 3D printed scaffolds controls the volume and functionality of newly formed bone. Adv Healthc Mater 8(1):e1801353. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.20180135310.1002/adhm.201801353 ↗
2. Ning L, Zhu N, Smith A, Rajaram A, Hou H, Srinivasan S, Mohabatpour F, He L, Mclnnes A, Serpooshan V, Papagerakis P, Chen X (2021) Noninvasive three-dimensional in situ and in vivo characterization of bioprinted hydrogel scaffolds using the X-ray Propagation-Based Imaging Technique. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 13(22):25611–25623. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c0229710.1021/acsami.1c02297 ↗
3. Zimmerling A, Yazdanpanah Z, Cooper DM, Johnston JD, Chen X (2021) 3D printing PCL/nHA bone scaffolds: exploring the influence of material synthesis techniques. Biomater Res 25(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-021-00204-y10.1186/s40824-021-00204-y ↗
4. Sadeghianmaryan A, Naghieh S, Sardroud HA, Yazdanpanah Z, Soltani YA, Sernaglia J, Chen X (2020) Extrusion-based printing of chitosan scaffolds and their in vitro characterization for cartilage tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol 164:3179–3192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.08.18010.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.08.180 ↗
5. You F, Wu X, Kelly M, Chen X (2020) Bioprinting and in vitro characterization of alginate dialdehyde–gelatin hydrogel bio-ink. Bio-Des Manuf 3(1):48–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42242-020-00058-810.1007/s42242-020-00058-8 ↗
6. Naghieh S, Sarker M, Sharma N, Barhoumi Z, Chen X (2020) Printability of 3D printed hydrogel scaffolds: influence of hydrogel composition and printing parameters. Appl Sci 10(1):292. https://doi.org/10.3390/app1001029210.3390/app10010292 ↗
7. Wu Y, Yang L (2021) Modeling and analysis of material anisotropy-topology effects of 3D cellular structures fabricated by powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Inter J Mech Sci 197:106325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.10632510.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106325 ↗
8. Soufivand AA, Abolfathi N, Hashemi SA, Lee SJ (2019) Prediction of mechanical behavior of 3D bioprinted tissue-engineered scaffolds using finite element method (FEM) analysis. SSRN Electronic J 33:101181. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.343185110.1016/j.addma.2020.101181 ↗
9. Liang X, Gao J, Weike Xu, Wang X, Shen Y, Tang J, Cui S, Yang X, Liu Q, Lin Yu, Ding J (2019) Structural mechanics of 3D-printed poly(lactic acid) scaffolds with tetragonal, hexagonal and wheel-like designs. Biofabrication 11(3):035009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab0f5910.1088/1758-5090/ab0f59 ↗
10. Little CJ, Bawolin NK, Chen X (2011) Mechanical properties of natural cartilage and tissue-engineered constructs. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 17(4):213–227. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2010.057210.1089/ten.teb.2010.0572 ↗
11. Ali D, Sen S (2017) Finite element analysis of mechanical behavior, permeability and fluid induced wall shear stress of high porosity scaffolds with gyroid and lattice-based architectures. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 75:262–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.07.03510.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.07.035 ↗
12. Li Z, Chen Z, Chen X, Zhao R (2021) Effect of unit configurations and parameters on the properties of Ti–6Al–4V unit-stacked scaffolds: a trade-off between mechanical and permeable performance. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 116:104332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.10433210.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104332 ↗
13. Montazerian H, Zhianmanesh M, Davoodi E, Milani AS, Hoorfar M (2017) Longitudinal and radial permeability analysis of additively manufactured porous scaffolds: effect of pore shape and porosity. Mater Des 122(MAY15):146–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.00610.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.006 ↗
14. Pei X, Wu L, Zhou C, Fan H, Zhang X (2020) 3D printed titanium scaffolds with homogeneous diamond-like structures mimicking that of the osteocyte microenvironment and its bone regeneration study. Biofabrication 13(1):015008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/abc06010.1088/1758-5090/abc060 ↗
15. Zhang XY, Gang F, Leeflang S, Zadpoor AA, Zhou J (2019) Topological design, permeability and mechanical behavior of additively manufactured functionally graded porous metallic biomaterials. Acta Biomater 84(437):452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2018.12.01310.1016/j.actbio.2018.12.013 ↗
16. Montazerian H, Mohamed MGA, Mohaghegh Montazeri M, Kheiri S, Milani AS, Kim K, Hoorfar M (2019) Permeability and mechanical properties of gradient porous PDMS scaffolds fabricated by 3D-printed sacrificial templates designed with minimal surfaces. Acta Biomater 96:149–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.06.04010.1016/j.actbio.2019.06.040 ↗
17. Olubamiji AD, Izadifar Z, Si JL, Cooper DM, Eames BF, Chen DX (2016) Modulating mechanical behaviour of 3D-printed cartilage-mimetic PCL scaffolds: influence of molecular weight and pore geometry. Biofabrication 8(2):025020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/8/2/02502010.1088/1758-5090/8/2/025020 ↗
18. Kelly CN, Francovich J, Julmi S, Safranski D, Gall K (2019) Fatigue behavior of as-built selective laser melted titanium scaffolds with sheet-based gyroid microarchitecture for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 94:610–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.04610.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.046 ↗
19. Maskery I, Aremu AO, Parry L, Wildman RD, Tuck CJ, Ashcroft IA (2018) design, Effective design and simulation of surface-based lattice structures featuring volume fraction and cell type grading. Mater Des 155:220–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.05.05810.1016/j.matdes.2018.05.058 ↗
20. Al-Saedi DS, Masood S, Faizan-Ur-Rab M, Alomarah A, Ponnusamy P (2018) Mechanical properties and energy absorption capability of functionally graded F2BCC lattice fabricated by SLM. Mater Des 144:32–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.01.05910.1016/j.matdes.2018.01.059 ↗
21. Ning L, Xu Y, Chen X, Schreyer DJ (2016) Influence of mechanical properties of alginate-based substrates on the performance of Schwann cells in culture. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 27(9):898–915. https://doi.org/10.1080/09205063.2016.117041510.1080/09205063.2016.1170415 ↗
22. Chen DXB (2019) Extrusion bioprinting of scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 117–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03460-310.1007/978-3-030-03460-3 ↗
23. Pahlevanzadeh F, Bakhsheshi-Rad HR, Ismail AF, Aziz M, Chen XB (2019) Development of PMMA-Mon-CNT bone cement with superior mechanical properties and favorable biological properties for use in bone-defect treatment. Mater Letters 240:9–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2018.12.04910.1016/j.matlet.2018.12.049 ↗
24. Bobbert F, Lietaert K, Eftekhari AA, Pouran B, Ahmadi SM, Weinans H, Zadpoor AA (2017) Additively manufactured metallic porous biomaterials based on minimal surfaces: a unique combination of topological, mechanical, and mass transport properties. Acta Biomater 53:572–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.02.02410.1016/j.actbio.2017.02.024 ↗
25. Li Y, Jahr H, Pavanram P, Bobbert FSL, Puggi U, Zhang X-Y, Pouran B, Leeflang MA, Weinans H, Zhou J, Zadpoor AA (2019) Additively manufactured functionally graded biodegradable porous iron. Acta Biomater 96:646–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.07.01310.1016/j.actbio.2019.07.013 ↗
26. Bawolin KN (2010) Modeling material-degradation-induced elastic property of tissue engineering scaffolds. J Biomech Eng 132(11):111001–111007. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.400255110.1115/1.4002551 ↗
27. Yu G, Li Z, Li S, Zhang Q, Wang X (2020) The select of internal architecture for porous Ti alloy scaffold: a compromise between mechanical properties and permeability. Mater Des 192:108754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10875410.1016/j.matdes.2020.108754 ↗
28. Zhang XY, Fang G, Xing LL, Liu W, Zhou J (2018) Effect of porosity variation strategy on the performance of functionally graded Ti-6Al-4V scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Mater Des 157:523–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.07.06410.1016/j.matdes.2018.07.064 ↗
29. Fan X, Tang Q, Feng Q, Ma S, Song J, Jin M, Guo F, Jin P (2021) Design, mechanical properties and energy absorption capability of graded-thickness triply periodic minimal surface structures fabricated by selective laser melting. Int J Mech Sci 204:106586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.10658610.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106586 ↗
30. Zhang C, Jiang Z, Zhao Li, Guo W, Jiang Z, Li X, Chen G (2021) Mechanical characteristics and deformation mechanism of functionally graded triply periodic minimal surface structures fabricated using stereolithography. Int J Mech Sci 208:106679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.10667910.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106679 ↗
31. Bohara RP, Linforth S, Nguyen T, Ghazlan A, Ngo T (2021) Novel lightweight high-energy absorbing auxetic structures guided by topology optimisation. Inter J Mech Sci 211:106793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.10679310.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106793 ↗
32. Mahbod M, Asgari M (2019) Elastic and plastic characterization of a new developed additively manufactured functionally graded porous lattice structure: Analytical and numerical models. Inter J Mech Sci 155:248–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.02.04110.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.02.041 ↗
33. Yan C, Hao L, Hussein A, Bubb SL, Young P, Raymont D (2014) Evaluation of light-weight AlSi10Mg periodic cellular lattice structures fabricated via direct metal laser sintering. J Mater Process Technol 214(4):856–864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.12.00410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.12.004 ↗
34. Yan C, Hao L, Hussein A, Young P, Huang J, Zhu W (2015) Microstructure and mechanical properties of aluminium alloy cellular lattice structures manufactured by direct metal laser sintering. Mater Sci Eng A 628:238–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.01.06310.1016/j.msea.2015.01.063 ↗
35. Yan C, Hao L, Hussein A, Young P (2015) Ti–6Al–4V triply periodic minimal surface structures for bone implants fabricated via selective laser melting. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 51:61–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.06.02410.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.06.024 ↗
36. Zhang L, Song Bo, Choi S-K, Shi Y (2021) A topology strategy to reduce stress shielding of additively manufactured porous metallic biomaterials. Inter J Mech Sci 197:106331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.10633110.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106331 ↗
37. Hipfinger C, Subbiah R, Tahayeri A, Athirasala A, Bertassoni LE (2020) 3D printing of microgel-loaded modular LEGO-like cages as instructive scaffolds for tissue engineering. Adv Mater. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.02.97420410.1101/2020.03.02.974204 ↗
38. Van Bael S, Chai YC, Truscello S, Moesen M, Kerckhofs G, Van Oosterwyck H, Kruth J-P, Schrooten J (2012) The effect of pore geometry on the in vitro biological behavior of human periosteum-derived cells seeded on selective laser-melted Ti6Al4V bone scaffolds. Acta Biomater 8(7):2824–2834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.04.00110.1016/j.actbio.2012.04.001 ↗
39. Maskery I, Aboulkhair NT, Aremu AO, Tuck CJ, Ashcroft IA, Wildman RD, Hague R (2016) A mechanical property evaluation of graded density Al-Si10-Mg lattice structures manufactured by selective laser melting. Mater Sci Eng: A 670:264–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.06.01310.1016/j.msea.2016.06.013 ↗
40. Li Z-H, Nie Y-F, Liu B, Kuai Z-Z, Zhao M, Liu F (2020) Mechanical properties of AlSi10Mg lattice structures fabricated by selective laser melting. Mater Des 192:108709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10870910.1016/j.matdes.2020.108709 ↗
41. Biswas N, Ding JL (2015) Numerical study of the deformation and fracture behavior of porous Ti6Al4V alloy under static and dynamic loading. Inter J Impact Eng 82:89–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.08.01110.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.08.011 ↗
42. Sobolev AV, Radchenko MV (2016) Use of Johnson–Cook plasticity model for numerical simulations of the SNF shipping cask drop tests. Nuclear Energy Technol 2(4):272–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucet.2016.11.01410.1016/j.nucet.2016.11.014 ↗
43. Banerjee A, Dhar S, Acharyya S, Datta D, Nayak N (2015) Determination of Johnson cook material and failure model constants and numerical modelling of Charpy impact test of armour steel. Mater Sci Eng: A 640:200–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.05.07310.1016/j.msea.2015.05.073 ↗
44. Nirmal RR, Patnaik BSV, Jayaganthan R (2020) Numerical simulation on deformation behaviour of additively manufactured AlSi10Mg alloy. Inter J Mech Mater Eng 14:505–510
45. Wang Y, Liu F, Zhang X, Zhang K, Wang X, Gan D, Yang B (2021) Cell-size graded sandwich enhances additive manufacturing fidelity and energy absorption. Inter J Mech Sci 211:106798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.10679810.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106798 ↗
46. Fan X, Tang Q, Feng Q, Ma S, Song J, Jin M, Guo F, Jin P (2021) Design, mechanical properties and energy absorption capability of graded-thickness triply periodic minimal surface structures fabricated by selective laser melting. Inter J Mech Sci 204:106586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.10658610.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106586 ↗
47. Ashraf AA, Zebarjad SM, Hadianfard MJ (2019) The cross-linked polyvinyl alcohol/hydroxyapatite nanocomposite foam. J Mater Res Technol 8(3):3149–3157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.02.02410.1016/j.jmrt.2019.02.024 ↗
48. Bawolin NK, Dolovich AT, Chen DX, Zhang CW (2015) Characterization of mechanical properties of tissue scaffolds by phase contrast imaging and finite element modeling. J Biomech Eng 137(8):081004. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.403040910.1115/1.4030409 ↗
49. Afshar M, Anaraki AP, Montazerian H, Kadkhodapour J (2016) Additive manufacturing and mechanical characterization of graded porosity scaffolds designed based on triply periodic minimal surface architectures. J Mech Behavior Biomed Mater 62:481–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.05.02710.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.05.027 ↗
50. Chunze Y, Liang H, Ahmed H, David R (2012) Evaluations of cellular lattice structures manufactured using selective laser melting. Inter J Mach Tools Manufacture 62:32–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2012.06.00210.1016/j.ijmachtools.2012.06.002 ↗
51. Yang E, Leary M, Lozanovski B, David Downing MM (2019) Effect of geometry on the mechanical properties of Ti-6Al-4V Gyroid structures fabricated via SLM: a numerical study. Mater Des 184:108165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10816510.1016/j.matdes.2019.108165 ↗
52. Wu S, Liu X, Yeung KWK, Liu C, Yang X (2014) Biomimetic porous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng: R 80:1–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2014.04.00110.1016/j.mser.2014.04.001 ↗
53. Choy SY, Sun CN, Leong KF, Wei J (2017) Compressive properties of functionally graded lattice structures manufactured by selective laser melting. Mater Des 131:112–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.06.00610.1016/j.matdes.2017.06.006 ↗
54. William VG, Everth HN, Gwendolen R, Russell G (2014) Fabrication and mechanical characterisation of titanium lattices with graded porosity. Metals 4(3):401–409. https://doi.org/10.3390/met403040110.3390/met4030401 ↗
55. Zhao S, Li SJ, Wang SG, Hou WT, Li Y, Zhang LC, Hao YL, Yang R, Misra RDK, Murr LE (2018) Compressive and fatigue behavior of functionally graded Ti-6Al-4V meshes fabricated by electron beam melting. Acta Mater 150:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2018.02.06010.1016/j.actamat.2018.02.060 ↗
56. Liu D, Nie W, Li D, Wang W, Zheng L, Zhang J, Zhang J, Peng C, Mo X, He C (2019) 3D printed PCL/SrHA scaffold for enhanced bone regeneration. Chem Eng J 362:269–27910.1016/j.cej.2019.01.015 ↗