Origin of {112} < 111 > antitwinning in a Ti-24Nb-4Zr-8Sn superelastic single crystal
Source abstract
Abstract
{112}<111>(beta) twins are observed in a superelastic beta Ti-24Nb-4Zr-8Sn (wt.%) single crystal after tensile test. A careful Schmid factor analysis shows that these twins are formed in the antitwinning sense regarding the classical {112}<111>(beta) twinning system of bcc structures. These are then {112}<111>(beta) antitwins. Moreover, a full stress-induced martensitic (SIM) transformation of beta phase into a`` martensite is evidenced from in situ synchrotron X-ray diffraction. This transformation is fully accomplished before the onset of plastic deformation and, in turn, the formation of twins. From crystallographic reconstruction, {112}<111>(beta) antitwins are shown to be passively formed from the reversion, during the reverse SIM transformation when the stress is released, of {110}<110>(alpha '') twins actually formed in alpha '' martensite. The martensitic transformation occurring before twinning plays a key role in the activation of antitwinning systems by reducing both shear and shuffle magnitudes of twinning. Variant selection of stress-induced martensite and Schmid factor analysis show that the classical {112}<111>(beta) twins can never be activated in b titanium alloys involving SIM transformation, while the non-classical {112}<111>(beta) twinning system in the antitwinning sense is always favored.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties · Advanced materials and composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (58)
Show source-provided references
1. Niinomi M (2003) Fatigue performance and cyto-toxicity of low rigidity titanium alloy, Ti–29Nb–13Ta–4.6Zr. Biomaterials 24:2673–2683. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00069-310.1016/S0142-9612(03)00069-3 ↗
2. Geetha M, Singh AK, Asokamani R, Gogia AK (2009) Ti based biomaterials, the ultimate choice for orthopaedic implants—a review. Prog Mater Sci 54:397–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.06.00410.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.06.004 ↗
3. Cimpean A, Mitran V, Ciofrangeanu CM, Galateanu B, Bertrand E, Gordin D-M, Iordachescu D, Gloriant T (2012) Osteoblast cell behavior on the new beta-type Ti–25Ta–25Nb alloy. Mater Sci Eng C 32:1554–1563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2012.04.04210.1016/j.msec.2012.04.042 ↗
4. Castany P, Gordin DM, Drob SI, Vasilescu C, Mitran V, Cimpean A, Gloriant T (2016) Deformation mechanisms and biocompatibility of the superelastic Ti–23Nb–0.7Ta–2Zr–0.5N alloy. Shape Mem Superelasticity 2:18–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40830-016-0057-010.1007/s40830-016-0057-0 ↗
5. Gordin DM, Ion R, Vasilescu C, Drob SI, Cimpean A, Gloriant T (2014) Potentiality of the “Gum Metal” titanium-based alloy for biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng C 44:362–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2014.08.00310.1016/j.msec.2014.08.003 ↗
6. Bertrand E, Gloriant T, Gordin DM, Vasilescu E, Drob P, Vasilescu C, Drob SI (2010) Synthesis and characterisation of a new superelastic Ti-25Ta-25Nb biomedical alloy. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 3:559–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2010.06.00710.1016/j.jmbbm.2010.06.007 ↗
7. Laheurte P, Prima F, Eberhardt A, Gloriant T, Wary M, Patoor E (2010) Mechanical properties of low modulus β titanium alloys designed from the electronic approach. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 3:565–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2010.07.00110.1016/j.jmbbm.2010.07.001 ↗
8. Bertrand E, Castany P, Gloriant T (2013) Investigation of the martensitic transformation and the damping behavior of a superelastic Ti–Ta–Nb alloy. Acta Mater 61:511–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2012.09.06510.1016/j.actamat.2012.09.065 ↗
9. Hao YL, Li SJ, Sun SY, Yang R (2006) Effect of Zr and Sn on Young’s modulus and superelasticity of Ti–Nb-based alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 441:112–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.09.05110.1016/j.msea.2006.09.051 ↗
10. Fernandes Santos P, Niinomi M, Liu H, Cho K, Nakai M, Trenggono A, Champagne S, Hermawan H, Narushima T (2016) Improvement of microstructure, mechanical and corrosion properties of biomedical Ti-Mn alloys by Mo addition. Mater Design 110:414–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.07.11510.1016/j.matdes.2016.07.115 ↗
11. Zhao X, Niinomi M, Nakai M, Miyamoto G, Furuhara T (2011) Microstructures and mechanical properties of metastable Ti–30Zr–(Cr, Mo) alloys with changeable Young’s modulus for spinal fixation applications. Acta Biomater 7:3230–3236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2011.04.01910.1016/j.actbio.2011.04.019 ↗
12. Castany P, Ramarolahy A, Prima F, Laheurte P, Curfs C, Gloriant T (2015) In situ synchrotron X-ray diffraction study of the martensitic transformation in superelastic Ti-24Nb-0.5N and Ti-24Nb-0.5O alloys. Acta Mater 88:102–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2015.01.01410.1016/j.actamat.2015.01.014 ↗
13. Gao JJ, Thibon I, Laillé D, Castany P, Gloriant T (2019) Influence of texture and transformation strain on the superelastic performance of a new Ti–20Zr–3Mo–3Sn alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 762:138075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2019.13807510.1016/j.msea.2019.138075 ↗
14. Obbard EG, Hao YL, Akahori T, Talling RJ, Niinomi M, Dye D, Yang R (2010) Mechanics of superelasticity in Ti–30Nb–(8–10)Ta–5Zr alloy. Acta Mater 58:3557–3567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2010.02.01010.1016/j.actamat.2010.02.010 ↗
15. Tahara M, Kim HY, Hosoda H, Miyazaki S (2009) Cyclic deformation behavior of a Ti-26 at.% Nb alloy. Acta Mater 57:2461–2469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2009.01.03710.1016/j.actamat.2009.01.037 ↗
16. Ijaz MF, Kim HY, Hosoda H, Miyazaki S (2014) Effect of Sn addition on stress hysteresis and superelastic properties of a Ti–15Nb–3Mo alloy. Scr Mater 72–73:29–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.10.00710.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.10.007 ↗
17. Bertrand E, Castany P, Péron I, Gloriant T (2011) Twinning system selection in a metastable β-titanium alloy by Schmid factor analysis. Scr Mater 64:1110–1113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.02.03310.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.02.033 ↗
18. Ramarolahy A, Castany P, Prima F, Laheurte P, Péron I, Gloriant T (2012) Microstructure and mechanical behavior of superelastic Ti-24Nb-0.5O and Ti-24Nb-0.5N biomedical alloys. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 9:83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.01.01710.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.01.017 ↗
19. Lin F, Marteleur M, Jacques PJ, Delannay L (2018) Transmission of {332} <113> twins across grain boundaries in a metastable β-titanium alloy. Int J Plast 105:195–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2018.02.01210.1016/j.ijplas.2018.02.012 ↗
20. Cho K, Morioka R, Harjo S, Kawasaki T, Yasuda HY (2020) Study on formation mechanism of {332}<113> deformation twinning in metastable β-type Ti alloy focusing on stress-induced α” martensite phase. Scr Mater 177:106–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.10.01110.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.10.011 ↗
21. Min X, Chen X, Emura S, Tsuchiya K (2013) Mechanism of twinning-induced plasticity in β-type Ti–15Mo alloy. Scr Mater 69:393–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.05.02710.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.05.027 ↗
22. Yang Y, Castany P, Hao YL, Gloriant T (2020) Plastic deformation via hierarchical nano-sized martensitic twinning in the metastable β Ti-24Nb-4Zr-8Sn alloy. Acta Mater 194:27–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2020.04.02110.1016/j.actamat.2020.04.021 ↗
23. Castany P, Besse M, Gloriant T (2012) In situ TEM study of dislocation slip in a metastable β titanium alloy. Scr Mater 66:371–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.11.03610.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.11.036 ↗
24. Mompiou F, Tingaud D, Chang Y, Gault B, Dirras G (2018) Conventional vs harmonic-structured β-Ti-25Nb-25Zr alloys: a comparative study of deformation mechanisms. Acta Mater 161:420–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2018.09.03210.1016/j.actamat.2018.09.032 ↗
25. Castany P, Besse M, Gloriant T (2011) Dislocation mobility in gum metal beta-titanium alloy studied via in situ transmission electron microscopy. Phys Rev B 84:020201. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.02020110.1103/PhysRevB.84.020201 ↗
26. Besse M, Castany P, Gloriant T (2011) Mechanisms of deformation in gum metal TNTZ-O and TNTZ titanium alloys: a comparative study on the oxygen influence. Acta Mater 59:5982–5988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2011.06.00610.1016/j.actamat.2011.06.006 ↗
27. Bertrand E, Castany P, Yang Y, Menou E, Gloriant T (2016) Deformation twinning in the full-α" martensitic Ti–25Ta–20Nb shape memory alloy. Acta Mater 105:94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2015.12.00110.1016/j.actamat.2015.12.001 ↗
28. Kim HY, Ikehara Y, Kim JI, Hosoda H, Miyazaki S (2006) Martensitic transformation, shape memory effect and superelasticity of Ti-Nb binary alloys. Acta Mater 54:2419–2429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2006.01.01910.1016/j.actamat.2006.01.019 ↗
29. Tahara M, Kim HY, Hosoda H, Nam T-H, Miyazaki S (2010) Effect of nitrogen addition and annealing temperature on superelastic properties of Ti–Nb–Zr–Ta alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 527:6844–6852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2010.07.05210.1016/j.msea.2010.07.052 ↗
30. Kim HY, Sasaki T, Okutsu K, Kim JI, Inamura T, Hosoda H, Miyazaki S (2006) Texture and shape memory behavior of Ti-22Nb-6Ta alloy. Acta Mater 54:423–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2005.09.01410.1016/j.actamat.2005.09.014 ↗
31. Bignon M, Bertrand E, Tancret F, Rivera-Díaz-del-Castillo PEJ (2019) Modelling martensitic transformation in titanium alloys: the influence of temperature and deformation. Materialia 7:100382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtla.2019.10038210.1016/j.mtla.2019.100382 ↗
32. Brozek C, Sun F, Vermaut P, Millet Y, Lenain A, Embury D, Jacques PJ, Prima F (2016) A β-titanium alloy with extra high strain-hardening rate: design and mechanical properties. Scr Mater 114:60–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.11.02010.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.11.020 ↗
33. Danard Y, Poulain R, Garcia M, Guillou R, Thiaudière D, Mantri S, Banerjee R, Sun F, Prima F (2019) Microstructure design and in-situ investigation of TRIP/TWIP effects in a forged dual-phase Ti–10V–2Fe–3Al alloy. Materialia 8:100507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtla.2019.10050710.1016/j.mtla.2019.100507 ↗
34. Lilensten L, Danard Y, Brozek C, Mantri S, Castany P, Gloriant T, Vermaut P, Sun F, Banerjee R, Prima F (2019) On the heterogeneous nature of deformation in a strain-transformable beta metastable Ti-V-Cr-Al alloy. Acta Mater 162:268–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2018.10.00310.1016/j.actamat.2018.10.003 ↗
35. Sun F, Zhang JY, Marteleur M, Brozek C, Rauch EF, Veron M, Vermaut P, Jacques PJ, Prima F (2015) A new titanium alloy with a combination of high strength, high strain hardening and improved ductility. Scr Mater 94:17–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.09.00510.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.09.005 ↗
36. Laplanche G, Pfetzing-Micklich J, Eggeler G (2014) Sudden stress-induced transformation events during nanoindentation of NiTi shape memory alloys. Acta Mater 78:144–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2014.05.06110.1016/j.actamat.2014.05.061 ↗
37. Otsuka K, Ren X (2005) Physical metallurgy of Ti-Ni-based shape memory alloys. Prog Mater Sci 50:511–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2004.10.00110.1016/j.pmatsci.2004.10.001 ↗
38. Gall K, Sehitoglu H (1999) The role of texture in tension–compression asymmetry in polycrystalline NiTi. Int J Plast 15:69–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-6419(98)00060-610.1016/S0749-6419(98)00060-6 ↗
39. Gao X, Huang M, Brinson LC (2000) A multivariant micromechanical model for SMAs part 1. Crystallographic issues for single crystal model. Int J Plast 16:1345–1369. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-6419(00)00013-910.1016/S0749-6419(00)00013-9 ↗
40. Castany P, Gloriant T, Sun F, Prima F (2018) Design of strain-transformable titanium alloys. C R Phys 19:710–720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crhy.2018.10.00410.1016/j.crhy.2018.10.004 ↗
41. Ijaz MF, Kim HY, Hosoda H, Miyazaki S (2015) Superelastic properties of biomedical (Ti-Zr)-Mo-Sn alloys. Mater Sci Eng C 48:11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2014.11.01010.1016/j.msec.2014.11.010 ↗
42. Kim HY, Hashimoto S, Kim JI, Inamura T, Hosoda H, Miyazaki S (2006) Effect of Ta addition on shape memory behavior of Ti–22Nb alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 417:120–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2005.10.06510.1016/j.msea.2005.10.065 ↗
43. Kim JI, Kim HY, Inamura T, Hosoda H, Miyazaki S (2005) Shape memory characteristics of Ti–22Nb–(2–8)Zr(at.%) biomedical alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 403:334–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2005.05.05010.1016/j.msea.2005.05.050 ↗
44. Ijaz MF, Héraud L, Castany P, Thibon I, Gloriant T (2020) Superelastic behavior of biomedical metallic alloys. Metall Mater Trans A 51:3733–3741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-020-05840-y10.1007/s11661-020-05840-y ↗
45. Tahara M, Kim HY, Inamura T, Hosoda H, Miyazaki S (2011) Lattice modulation and superelasticity in oxygen-added β-Ti alloys. Acta Mater 59:6208–6218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2011.06.01510.1016/j.actamat.2011.06.015 ↗
46. Christian JW, Mahajan S (1995) Deformation twinning. Prog Mater Sci 39:1–15710.1016/0079-6425(94)00007-7 ↗
47. Tobe H, Kim HY, Inamura T, Hosoda H, Miyazaki S (2014) Origin of 332 twinning in metastable β-Ti alloys. Acta Mater 64:345–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2013.10.04810.1016/j.actamat.2013.10.048 ↗
48. Qian B, Zhang J, Fu Y, Sun F, Wu Y, Cheng J, Vermaut P, Prima F (2021) In-situ microstructural investigations of the TRIP-to-TWIP evolution in Ti-Mo-Zr alloys as a function of Zr concentration. J Mater Sci Tech 65:228–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2020.04.07810.1016/j.jmst.2020.04.078 ↗
49. Castany P, Yang Y, Bertrand E, Gloriant T (2016) Reversion of a parent {130}<310>α’’ martensitic twinning system at the origin of {332}<113>β twins observed in metastable beta titanium alloys. Phys Rev Lett 117:245501. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.24550110.1103/PhysRevLett.117.245501 ↗
50. Lai MJ, Tasan CC, Raabe D (2016) On the mechanism of 332 twinning in metastable β titanium alloys. Acta Mater 111:173–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.03.04010.1016/j.actamat.2016.03.040 ↗
51. Chen B, Sun W (2018) Transitional structure of {332}<113> β twin boundary in a deformed metastable β-type Ti-Nb-based alloy, revealed by atomic resolution electron microscopy. Scr Mater 150:115–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.03.00910.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.03.009 ↗
52. Chai YW, Kim HY, Hosoda H, Miyazaki S (2009) Self-accommodation in Ti-Nb shape memory alloys. Acta Mater 57:4054–4064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2009.04.05110.1016/j.actamat.2009.04.051 ↗
53. Inamura T, Kim JI, Kim HY, Hosoda H, Wakashima K, Miyazaki S (2007) Composition dependent crystallography of α"-martensite in Ti-Nb-based β-titanium alloy. Philos Mag 87:3325–3350. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478643060100387410.1080/14786430601003874 ↗
54. Tahara M, Okano N, Inamura T, Hosoda H (2017) Plastic deformation behaviour of single-crystalline martensite of Ti-Nb shape memory alloy. Sci Rep 7:15715. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15877-610.1038/s41598-017-15877-6 ↗
55. Ping DH, Yamabe-Mitarai Y, Cui CY, Yin FX, Choudhry MA (2008) Stress-induced α" martensitic (110) twinning in β-Ti alloys. Appl Phys Lett 93:151911. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.300229510.1063/1.3002295 ↗
56. Yang Y, Castany P, Bertrand E, Cornen M, Lin JX, Gloriant T (2018) Stress release-induced interfacial twin boundary ω phase formation in a β type Ti-based single crystal displaying stress-induced α” martensitic transformation. Acta Mater 149:97–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2018.02.03610.1016/j.actamat.2018.02.036 ↗
57. Jabir H, Fillon A, Castany P, Gloriant T (2019) Crystallographic orientation dependence of mechanical properties in the superelastic Ti-24Nb-4Zr-8Sn alloy. Phys Rev Mater 3:063608. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.06360810.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.063608 ↗
58. Inamura T, Yamamoto Y, Hosoda H, Kim HY, Miyazaki S (2010) Crystallographic orientation and stress-amplitude dependence of damping in the martensite phase in textured Ti-Nb-Al shape memory alloy. Acta Mater 58:2535–2544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2009.12.04010.1016/j.actamat.2009.12.040 ↗