Multi-scale characterization of ceramic inert-substrate-supported and co-sintered solid oxide fuel cells
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Understanding cell performance is essential for selecting cell components and the processing parameters for solid oxide fuel cells. The scale of relevant microstructural features in electrodes, electrolyte and supporting substrate covers several orders of magnitude. This contribution will demonstrate how advanced correlative multi-scale tomography can be used to identify those parameters: ranging from millimeter to nanometer scale. We employ optical microscopy, X-ray computed tomography (μ-CT), focused ion beam-scanning electron microscopy tomography and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy–scanning transmission electron microscopy. Additional investigations by selected area electron diffraction allow a determination of the underlying crystal structures. An SOFC design based on the co-sintering of an inert substrate with various functional layers on top is used as a blueprint, allowing further methodological development. The effect of interdiffusion between phases and development of secondary phases on microstructure and chemical composition will be shown. Furthermore, porosity and tortuosity extracted individually from all porous layers will allow modeling of gas diffusion loss contributions within the co-fired cell structure. This exemplifies how correlative tomography helps to understand specific contributions to overall cell performance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides · Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (61)
Show source-provided references
1. Yokokawa H, Tu H, Iwanschitz B, Mai A (2008) Fundamental mechanisms limiting solid oxide fuel cell durability. J Power Sources 182:400–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.02.01610.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.02.016 ↗
2. Bertoldi M, Bucheli OF, Ravagni A (2017) Development, manufacturing and deployment of SOFC-based products at SOLIDpower. ECS Trans 78:117–123. https://doi.org/10.1149/07801.0117ecst10.1149/07801.0117ecst ↗
3. Menzler NH, Tietz F, Uhlenbruck S et al (2010) Materials and manufacturing technologies for solid oxide fuel cells. J Mater Sci 45:3109–3135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-010-4279-910.1007/s10853-010-4279-9 ↗
4. Borglum B, Tang E, Pastula M (2011) Development of solid oxide fuel cells at versa power systems. ECS Trans 68:63–69. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.356997910.1149/1.3569979 ↗
5. Blum L, (Bert) de Haart LGJ, Malzbender J, et al (2013) Recent results in Jülich solid oxide fuel cell technology development. J Power Sources 241:477–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.04.11010.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.04.110 ↗
6. Voisard C (2005) Manufacturing solid oxide fuel cells for the sulzer hexis stationary system. Int J Appl Ceram Technol 1:31–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7402.2004.tb00152.x10.1111/j.1744-7402.2004.tb00152.x ↗
7. Ivers-Tiffée E, Wersing W, Schießl M, Greiner H (1990) Ceramic and metallic components for a planar SOFC. Berichte der Bunsengesellschaft für Phys Chemie 94:978–981. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbpc.1990094091910.1002/bbpc.19900940919 ↗
8. George RA, Bessette NF (1998) Reducing the manufacturing cost of tubular solid oxide fuel cell technology. J Power Sources 71:131–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7753(97)02735-310.1016/S0378-7753(97)02735-3 ↗
9. Gardner F, Day M, Brandon N et al (2000) SOFC technology development at Rolls-Royce. J Power Sources 86:122–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7753(99)00428-010.1016/S0378-7753(99)00428-0 ↗
10. Yokokawa H, Kishimoto H, Yamaji K et al (2011) Cooperative investigations on degradation of cathode materials in segment-in-series cells by MHI. ECS Trans 35:2191–2200. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.357021210.1149/1.3570212 ↗
11. Brandon NP, Blake A, Corcoran D et al (2004) Development of metal supported solid oxide fuel cells for operation at 500–600°C. J Fuel Cell Sci Technol 1:61. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.179470910.1115/1.1794709 ↗
12. Tucker MC (2017) Development of high power density metal-supported solid oxide fuel cells. Energy Technol 5:2175–2181. https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.20170024210.1002/ente.201700242 ↗
13. Blennow P, Hjelm J, Klemensø T et al (2011) Planar metal-supported SOFC with novel cermet anode. Fuel Cells 11:661–668. https://doi.org/10.1002/fuce.20110002910.1002/fuce.201100029 ↗
14. Yamamoto T, Yasumoto K, Yoshikawa M et al (2013) Performance evaluations for long term durability and reliability of segment-in-series tubular type SOFCs. ECS Trans 57:763–770. https://doi.org/10.1149/05701.0763ecst10.1149/05701.0763ecst ↗
15. Roehrens D, Han F, Haydn M et al (2015) Advances beyond traditional SOFC cell designs. Int J Hydrog Energy 40:11538–11542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.01.15510.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.01.155 ↗
16. Franco T, Haydn M, Weber A et al (2013) The status of metal-supported SOFC development and industrialization at plansee. ECS Trans 57:471–480. https://doi.org/10.1149/05701.0471ecst10.1149/05701.0471ecst ↗
17. Matte E, Lupetin P, Stolten D (2016) B1511 evaluation of cathode performance in co-sintered inert substrate-supported SOFC. In: Proceedings of 12th European SOFC SOE Forum B1511
18. Matsui T, Komoto M, Muroyama H et al (2016) Degradation factors in (La, Sr)(Co, Fe)O 3-δ cathode/Sm2O3–CeO2 interlayer/Y2O3–ZrO2 electrolyte system during operation of solid oxide fuel cells. J Power Sources 312:80–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.02.05210.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.02.052 ↗
19. Horita T, Nishi M, Shimonosono T et al (2014) Visualization of oxide ionic diffusion at SOFC cathode/electrolyte interfaces by isotope labeling techniques. Solid State Ionics 262:398–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2013.12.03910.1016/j.ssi.2013.12.039 ↗
20. Wankmüller F, Szász J, Joos J et al (2017) Correlative tomography at the cathode/electrolyte interfaces of solid oxide fuel cells. J Power Sources 360:399–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.06.00810.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.06.008 ↗
21. Szász J, Wankmüller F, Wilde V et al (2018) Nature and functionality of La 0.58 Sr 0.4 Co 0.2 Fe 0.8 O 3-δ/Gd 0.2 Ce 0.8 O 2-δ/Y 0.16 Zr 0.84 O 2-δ interfaces in SOFCs. J Electrochem Soc 165:F898–F906. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0031811jes10.1149/2.0031811jes ↗
22. Kindermann L, Nickel H, Hilpert K (1996) Chemical compatibility of the LaFeO3 base perovskites (La0.6Sr0.4)zFe0.8M0.2O3 − δ (z = 1, 0.9; M = Cr, Mn Co, Ni) with yttria stabilized zirconia. Solid State Ionics 89:215–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2738(96)00366-910.1016/0167-2738(96)00366-9 ↗
23. Yokokawa H, Sakai N, Kawada T, Dokiya M (1992) Thermodynamic stabilities of perovskite oxides for electrodes and other electrochemical materials. Solid State Ionics 52:43–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2738(92)90090-C10.1016/0167-2738(92)90090-C ↗
24. Levy C, Zhong Y, Morel C, Marlin S (2010) Thermodynamic stabilities of La[sub 2]Zr[sub 2]O[sub 7] and SrZrO[sub 3] in SOFC and their relationship with LSM synthesis processes. J Electrochem Soc 157:B1597. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.348156210.1149/1.3481562 ↗
25. Kawada T, Sakai N, Yokokawa H et al (1992) Reaction between solid oxide fuel-cell materials. Solid State Ionics 50:189–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2738(92)90218-E10.1016/0167-2738(92)90218-E ↗
26. Liu YL, Primdahl S, Mogensen M (2003) Effects of impurities on microstructure in Ni/YSZ-YSZ half-cells for SOFC. Solid State Ionics 161:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2738(03)00271-610.1016/S0167-2738(03)00271-6 ↗
27. Schuler JA, Wuillemin Z, Hessler-Wyser A, Van Herle J (2011) Glass-forming exogenous silicon contamination in solid oxide fuel cell cathodes. Electrochem Solid-State Lett 14:B20. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.351662210.1149/1.3516622 ↗
28. Utz A, Hansen KV, Norrman K et al (2011) Impurity features in Ni-YSZ-H2-H2O electrodes. Solid State Ionics 183:60–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2010.12.01410.1016/j.ssi.2010.12.014 ↗
29. Njodzefon J-C, Maier N, Schmieg J, et al (2018) B0803 Performance and stability evaluation of a novel full- ceramic inert substrate-supported solid oxide fuel cell. In: Proceedings of the 13th European SOFC SOE Forum B0803
30. Eisele U, Heeren I (2011) Herstellungsverfahren für eine tubulare Brennstoffzelle
31. Schulze A, Fischer C, Schoenbauer S (2014) Brennstoffzellensystem mit verbesserter Kontaktierung
32. Matte E, Holzlechner G, Epple L et al (2019) Impact of silicate substrate and cosintering on cathode performance in an inert substrate-supported solid oxide fuel cell. J Power Sources 413:334–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.12.02510.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.12.025 ↗
33. Grimm F, Menzler NH, Guillon O (2020) Selection of cathode materials for forsterite supported solid oxide fuel cells—Part I: materials interactions. J Power Sources 451:227607. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JPOWSOUR.2019.22760710.1016/J.JPOWSOUR.2019.227607 ↗
34. Grimm F, Neubert M, Karl J et al (2020) Selection of cathode materials for forsterite-supported solid oxide fuel cells—Part II: electro-catalytic activity. J Power Sources 451:227811. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JPOWSOUR.2020.22781110.1016/J.JPOWSOUR.2020.227811 ↗
35. Joos J, Carraro T, Weber A, Ivers-Tiffée E (2011) Reconstruction of porous electrodes by FIB/SEM for detailed microstructure modeling. J Power Sources 196:7302–7307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.10.00610.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.10.006 ↗
36. Cantoni M, Holzer L (2014) Advances in 3D focused ion beam tomography. MRS Bull 39:354–360. https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs.2014.5410.1557/mrs.2014.54 ↗
37. Joos J, Ender M, Rotscholl I et al (2014) Quantification of double-layer Ni/YSZ fuel cell anodes from focused ion beam tomography data. J Power Sources 246:819–830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.08.02110.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.08.021 ↗
38. Cooper SJ, Bertei A, Shearing PR et al (2016) TauFactor: an open-source application for calculating tortuosity factors from tomographic data. SoftwareX 5:203–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2016.09.00210.1016/j.softx.2016.09.002 ↗
39. Appel CC (1995) Zirconia stabilized by Y and Mn: a microstructural characterization. Ionics (Kiel) 1:406–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0237528410.1007/BF02375284 ↗
40. Zhang TS, Chan SH, Wang W et al (2009) Effect of Mn addition on the densification, grain growth and ionic conductivity of pure and SiO2-containing 8YSZ electrolytes. Solid State Ionics 180:82–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2008.10.01010.1016/j.ssi.2008.10.010 ↗
41. Peters C, Weber A, Butz B et al (2009) Grain-size effects in YSZ thin-film electrolytes. J Am Ceram Soc 92:2017–2024. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03157.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03157.x ↗
42. Butz B, Kruse P, Störmer H et al (2006) Correlation between microstructure and degradation in conductivity for cubic Y2O3-doped ZrO2. Solid State Ionics 177:3275–3284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2006.09.00310.1016/j.ssi.2006.09.003 ↗
43. Yashima M, Sasaki S, Kakihana M et al (1994) Oxygen-induced structural change of the tetragonal phase around the tetragonal–cubic phase boundary in ZrO2–YO1.5 solid solutions. Acta Crystallogr Sect B: Struct Sci 50:663–672. https://doi.org/10.1107/S010876819400625710.1107/S0108768194006257 ↗
44. Kawashima T, Hishinuma M (1998) Phase transformation of yttria-stabilized zirconia (3 mol% Y2O3) in fuel cell caused by manganese diffusion. Mater Trans, JIM 39:617–620. https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans1989.39.61710.2320/matertrans1989.39.617 ↗
45. Van Herle J, Vasquez R (2004) Conductivity of Mn and Ni-doped stabilized zirconia electrolyte. J Eur Ceram Soc 24:1177–1180. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-2219(03)00471-010.1016/S0955-2219(03)00471-0 ↗
46. Kawada T, Sakai N, Yokokawa H, Dokiya M (1992) Electrical-properties of transition-metal-doped YSZ. Solid State Ionics 53–56:418–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2738(92)90409-I10.1016/0167-2738(92)90409-I ↗
47. Malzbender J, Batfalsky P, Vaßen R et al (2012) Component interactions after long-term operation of an SOFC stack with LSM cathode. J Power Sources 201:196–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.10.11710.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.10.117 ↗
48. Russner N, Dierickx S, Weber A et al (2020) Multiphysical modelling of planar solid oxide fuel cell stack layers. J Power Sources. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.22755210.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227552 ↗
49. Primdahl S, Mogensen M (1999) Gas diffusion impedance in characterization of solid oxide fuel cell anodes. J Electrochem Soc 146:2827–2833. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.139201510.1149/1.1392015 ↗
50. Leonide A (2010) SOFC modelling and parameter identification by means of impedance spectroscopy. KIT Scientific Publishing, Karlsruhe
51. Dierickx S, Joos J, Weber A, Ivers-Tiffée E (2018) Advanced impedance modelling of Ni/8YSZ cermet anodes. Electrochim Acta 265:736–750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2017.12.02910.1016/j.electacta.2017.12.029 ↗
52. Østergård MJL, Mogensen M (1993) ac Impedance study of the oxygen reduction mechanism on La1−xSrxMnO3 in solid oxide fuel cells. Electrochim Acta 38:2015–2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4686(93)80334-V10.1016/0013-4686(93)80334-V ↗
53. Adler SB (2004) Factors governing oxygen reduction in solid oxide fuel cell cathodes. Chem Rev 104:4791–4844. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr020724o10.1021/cr020724o ↗
54. Kim J-W, Virkar AV, Fung K-Z et al (1999) Polarization effects in intermediate temperature, anode-supported solid oxide fuel cells. J Electrochem Soc 146:69. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.139156610.1149/1.1391566 ↗
55. Cussler EL (2009) Diffusion: mass transfer in fluid systems, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge10.1017/CBO9780511805134 ↗
56. Velfsink JW, van Damme RMJ, Versteeg GF, van Swaaij WPM (1995) The use of the dusty-gas model for the description of mass transport with chemical reaction in porous media. Chem Eng J 57:115–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/0923-0467(94)02929-610.1016/0923-0467(94)02929-6 ↗
57. Chapman S, Cowling TG, Burnett D (1990) The mathematical theory of non-uniform gases: an account of the kinetic theory of viscosity, thermal conduction and diffusion in gases, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
58. Dierickx S, Mundloch T, Weber A, Ivers-Tiffée E (2019) Advanced impedance model for double-layered solid oxide fuel cell cermet anodes. J Power Sources 415:69–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.01.04310.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.01.043 ↗
59. Ivers-Tiffée E, Weber A, Schmid K, Krebs V (2004) Macroscale modeling of cathode formation in SOFC. Solid State Ionics 174:223–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2004.05.03110.1016/j.ssi.2004.05.031 ↗
60. McIntosh S, Adler SB, Vohs JM, Gorte RJ (2004) Effect of polarization on and implications for characterization of LSM-YSZ composite cathodes. Electrochem Solid-State Lett 7:A111. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.166779210.1149/1.1667792 ↗
61. Heneka MJ, Ivers-Tiffée E (2005) Degradation of SOFC single cells under severe current cycles. ECS Proc 2005–07:534–543. https://doi.org/10.1149/200507.0534PV10.1149/200507.0534PV ↗