journal article·2020-02

Electrowetting behaviour of thermostable liquid over wide temperature range

Sandip M. Wadhai, Yogesh B. Sawane, Arun G. Banpurkar

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 55· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Outdoor electrowetting (EW)-based applications need consistent wetting response in the temperatures ranging from − 40 to 70 °C. Aqueous ethylene glycol is commonly used as thermostable liquid; nevertheless, its EW behaviour over a wide range of temperature is less known. We examine this behaviour for both ac and dc voltages over the temperature range from − 25 to 65 °C. The self-consistent EW responses, i.e. cosine of contact angle versus voltage square, are analysed to illustrate the EW behaviour. There is a systematic increase in EW response with temperature confirmed from the linear dependence of interfacial tension on temperature. Our result corroborates Eotvos phenomenological relation. We suggest the need of correction voltage with changing temperature to maintain uniform EW response over this temperature range. Further with decreasing temperature, the solution viscosity increases more rapidly than the increase in interfacial tension value, and thus the capillary number $$ (Ca = \mu v/\gamma ) $$ gets partially regulated. This is seen as a marginal variation in the switching time of the EW contact angle during the OFF voltage state to ON state and vice versa. Finally, the working of a prototype liquid lens at − 25 °C, the lowest operating temperature, is demonstrated.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrowetting and Microfluidic Technologies · Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence · Biosensors and Analytical Detection

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Mugele F, Baret JC (2005) Electrowetting: from basics to applications. J Phys-Condens Matter 17:R705–R77410.1088/0953-8984/17/28/R01 ↗
2. Jones TB (2005) An electromechanical interpretation of electrowetting. J Micromech Microeng 15:1184–118710.1088/0960-1317/15/6/008 ↗
3. Haller B, Gopfrich K, Schroter M, Janiesch JW, Platzman I, Spatz JP (2018) Charge-controlled microfluidic formation of lipid-based single- and multicompartment systems. Lab Chip 18:2665–267410.1039/C8LC00582F ↗
4. de Ruiter R, Pit AM, de Oliveira VM, Duits MHG, van den Ende D, Mugele F (2014) Electrostatic potential wells for on-demand drop manipulation in microchannels. Lab Chip 14:883–89110.1039/c3lc51121a ↗
5. Guan Y, Li BY, Zhu MN, Cheng SJ, Tu JY (2019) Deformation, speed, and stability of droplet motion in closed electrowetting-based digital microfluidics. Phys Fluids 31:06200210.1063/1.5096656 ↗
6. Pit AM, Duits MHG, Mugele F (2015) Droplet manipulations in two phase flow microfluidics. Micromach Basel 6:1768–179310.3390/mi6111455 ↗
7. Kim DY, Steckl AJ (2007) Liquid-state field-effect transistors using electrowetting. Appl Phys Lett 90:04350710.1063/1.2435508 ↗
8. Latip ENA, Coudron L, McDonnell MB, Johnston ID, McCluskey DK, Day R, Tracey MC (2017) Protein droplet actuation on superhydrophobic surfaces: a new approach toward anti-biofouling electrowetting systems. Rsc Adv 7:49633–4964810.1039/C7RA10920B ↗
9. Banpurkar AG, Nichols KP, Mugele F (2008) Electrowetting-based microdrop tensiometer. Langmuir 24:10549–1055110.1021/la801549p ↗
10. Hsu TH, Taylor JA, Krupenkin TN (2017) Energy harvesting from aperiodic low-frequency motion using reverse electrowetting. Faraday Discuss 199:377–39210.1039/C6FD00253F ↗
11. Dey R, Gilbers J, Baratian D, Hoek H, van den Ende D, Mugele F (2018) Controlling shedding characteristics of condensate drops using electrowetting. Appl Phys Lett 113:24370310.1063/1.5064363 ↗
12. Mishra K, Murade C, Carreel B, Roghair I, Oh JM, Manukyan G, van den Ende D, Mugele F (2014) Optofluidic lens with tunable focal length and asphericity. Sci Rep UK 4:637810.1038/srep06378 ↗
13. Berge B, Peseux J (2000) Variable focal lens controlled by an external voltage: an application of electrowetting. Eur Phys J E 3:159–16310.1007/s101890070029 ↗
14. Hendriks BHW, Kuiper S, Van As MAJ, Renders CA, Tukker TW (2005) Electrowetting-based variable-focus lens for miniature systems. Opt Rev 12:255–25910.1007/s10043-005-0255-z ↗
15. Murade CU, van der Ende D, Mugele F (2012) High speed adaptive liquid microlens array. Opt Express 20:18180–1818710.1364/OE.20.018180 ↗
16. Zohrabi M, Lim WY, Cormack RH, Supekar OD, Bright VM, Gopinath JT (2019) Lidar system with nonmechanical electrowetting-based wide-angle beam steering. Opt Express 27:4404–441510.1364/OE.27.004404 ↗
17. Heikenfeld J, Zhou K, Kreit E, Raj B, Yang S, Sun B, Milarcik A, Clapp L, Schwartz R (2009) Electrofluidic displays using Young–Laplace transposition of brilliant pigment dispersions. Nat Photonics 3:292–29610.1038/nphoton.2009.68 ↗
18. Luo ZJ, Luo JK, Zhao WW, Cao Y, Lin WJ, Zhou GF (2018) A high-resolution and intelligent dead pixel detection scheme for an electrowetting display screen. Opt Rev 25:18–2610.1007/s10043-017-0382-3 ↗
19. Roques-Carmes T, Hayes RA, Feenstra BJ, Schlangen LJM (2004) Liquid behavior inside a reflective display pixel based on electrowetting. J Appl Phys 95:4389–439610.1063/1.1667595 ↗
20. Wu H, Haye RA, Li FH, Henzen A, Shui LL, Zhou GF (2018) Influence of fluoropolymer surface wettability on electrowetting display performance. Displays 53:47–5310.1016/j.displa.2018.02.002 ↗
21. Zhou R, Ye QL, Li H, Jiang HW, Tang B, Zhou GF (2019) Experimental study on the reliability of water/fluoropolymer/ITO contact in electrowetting displays. Results Phys 12:1991–199810.1016/j.rinp.2019.02.037 ↗
22. Li L, Wang D, Liu C, Wang QH (2016) Zoom microscope objective using electrowetting lenses. Opt Express 24:2931–294010.1364/OE.24.002931 ↗
23. Hu XD, Zhang SG, Lu XJ, Qu C, Lu LJ, MaXY Zhang XP, Deng YQ (2012) On the performance of thermostable electrowetting agents. Surf Interface Anal 44:478–48310.1002/sia.3835 ↗
24. Ober MS, Dermody D, Maillard M, Amiot F, Malet G, Burger B, Woelfle-Gupta C, Berge B (2018) Development of biphasic formulations for use in electrowetting-based liquid lenses with a high refractive index difference. Acs Comb Sci 20:554–56610.1021/acscombsci.8b00042 ↗
25. Eötvös L (1886) Ueber den Zusammenhang der Oberflächenspannung der Flüssigkeiten mit ihrem Molecularvolumen. Ann Phys 263:448–45910.1002/andp.18862630309 ↗
26. Liu CX, Park J, Choi JW (2018) A planar lens based on the electrowetting of two immiscible liquids. J Micromech Microeng 18:03502310.1088/0960-1317/18/3/035023 ↗
27. Banpurkar AG, Sawane Y, Wadhai SM, Murade CU, Siretanu I, van den Ende D, Mugele F (2017) Spontaneous electrification of fluoropolymer–water interfaces probed by electrowetting. Faraday Discuss 199:29–4710.1039/C6FD00245E ↗