journal article·2018-04

Si nanospring films for compliant interfaces

Dimitrios A. Antartis, Ryan N. Mott, Ioannis Chasiotis

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 53· Issue 8
Publisher page

Abstract

Films comprised of dense arrays of Si nanosprings were studied for their potential as compliant interface layers. The films, fabricated via glancing angle deposition (GLAD), were comprised of 10-µm high Si nanosprings with 4 or 10 coil turns and seed spacings of 900 nm or 1500 nm. Unseeded films with the same height and 4 or 10 coil turns were co-fabricated as the control material. The film mechanical behavior was a combination of the mechanical response of the individual springs and their interactions inside the film, resulting in increasing compressive stiffness with applied stress. The shear stiffness of all types of Si spring films was in the narrow range of 17–27 MPa. On the contrary, depending on coil geometry, the low-stress compressive stiffness could be varied in the broad range of 13–150 MPa. Thus, this class of nanostructured films allows for relatively decoupled normal and shear properties with values comparable to those of soft polymers. Despite that unseeded films have the thinnest coil wire, it was shown that seeding can produce equal or lower film stiffness, while also increasing the resistance to permanent compression at high stresses. Similarly, a capping layer increased the coherency of the films and their resistance to permanent compression without affecting significantly the compressive film stiffness. Capped films with 10-turn coils, with 900-nm seed spacing, provided the most resistance to permanent compression for stresses at least as high as 15 MPa, while maintaining compressive stiffness values that were equivalent to unseeded 10-turn springs. Finally, capped 4-turn springs with 900-nm seed spacing were shown to be the most compliant of all film types, including unseeded films, while also exhibiting the best agreement between film-level stiffness and estimates based on individual spring properties. Therefore, seeding of GLAD springs can produce films with increased resistance to permanent deformation while maintaining the low stiffness of unseeded films.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Optical Coatings and Gratings · Near-Field Optical Microscopy · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. Shaddock D, Weaver S, Chasiotis I, Shah B, Zhong D (2011) Development of a compliant nanothermal interface material. In: Proceedings of ASME 2011, pp. 1–510.1115/IPACK2011-52015 ↗
2. Antartis DA, Mott RN, Shaddock D and Chasiotis I (2017) Advanced thermal interfaces of nanospring films, in review
3. Bar-Cohen A, Matin K, Narumanchi S (2015) Nanothermal interface materials: technology review and recent results. J Electron Packag 137:040803-1–040803-17
4. Antartis D, Chasiotis I (2014) Residual stress and mechanical property measurements in amorphous si photovoltaic thin films. Sol Energy 105:694–70410.1016/j.solener.2014.04.012 ↗
5. Polat BD, Eryilmaz OL, Erck R, Keles O, Erdemir A, Amine K (2014) Structured SiCu thin films in LiB as anodes. Thin Solid Films 572:134–14110.1016/j.tsf.2014.09.008 ↗
6. Polat BD, Keles O, Amine K (2015) Silicon-copper helical arrays for new generation lithium ion batteries. Nano Lett 15:6702–670810.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02522 ↗
7. Polat BD, Keles O, Amine K (2016) Compositionally-graded silicon-copper helical arrays as anodes for lithium-ion batteries. J Power Sources 304:273–28110.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.11.032 ↗
8. Polat BD, Keles O (2016) Designing self-standing silicon-copper composite helices as anodes for lithium ion batteries. J Alloys Compd 677:228–23610.1016/j.jallcom.2016.03.125 ↗
9. Kharisov BI, Krarissova OV, Garcia BO, Méndez YP, Gómez de la Fuente I (2015) State of the art of nanoforest structures and their applications. RSC Adv 5:105507–10552310.1039/C5RA22738K ↗
10. Qu L, Dai L, Stone M, Xia Z, Wang ZL (2008) Carbon nanotube arrays with strong shear binding-on and easy normal lifting-off. Science 322:238–24210.1126/science.1159503 ↗
11. Tong T, Zhao Y, Delzeit L (2007) Dense vertically aligned multiwalled carbon nanotube arrays as thermal interface materials. IEEE Trans Compon Packag Technol 30:92–10010.1109/TCAPT.2007.892079 ↗
12. Ge L, Ci L, Goyal A, Shi R, Mahadevan L, Ajayan PM, Dhinojwala A (2010) Cooperative adhesion and friction of compliant nanohairs. Nano Lett 10:4509–451310.1021/nl102398w ↗
13. Kumar A, Maschmann MR, Hodson SL, Baur J, Fischer TS (2015) Carbon nanotube arrays decorated with multi-layer graphene-nanopetals enhance mechanical strength and durability. Carbon 84:236–24510.1016/j.carbon.2014.11.060 ↗
14. Sadasivam S, Hodson SL, Maschmann MR, Fischer TS (2016) Combined microstructure and heat transfer modeling of carbon nanotube thermal interface materials. J Heat Transf 138:042402-1–042402-1210.1115/1.4032174 ↗
15. Chen X, Zhang S, Dikin DA, Ding W, Ruoff RS, Pan L, Nakayama Y (2003) Mechanics of a carbon nanocoil. Nano Lett 3:1299–130410.1021/nl034367o ↗
16. Daraio C, Nesterenko VF, Jin S, Wang W, Rao AM (2006) Impact response by a foamlike forest of coiled carbon nanotubes. J Appl Phys 100:063409-1–063409-410.1063/1.2345609 ↗
17. Coluci VR, Fonseca AF, Galvão DS, Daraio C (2008) Entanglement and the nonlinear behavior of forests of coiled carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev Lett 100:086807-1–086807-410.1103/PhysRevLett.100.086807 ↗
18. Hawkeye M, Brett MJ (2007) Glancing angle deposition fabrication, properties, and applications of micro- and nanostructured thin films. J Vac Sci Technol A 25:1317–133510.1116/1.2764082 ↗
19. Taschuk MT, Hawkeye MM, Brett MJ (2010) Glancing angle deposition. In: Martin Peter M (ed) Handbook of deposition technologies for films and coatings, 3rd edn. Elsevier, Massachusetts
20. Zhao Y (2009) Growth and synthesis of nanostructured thin films. In: Fortin J, Zribi A (eds) Functional thin films and nanostructures for sensors. In: Potyrailo RA (ed) Integrated analytical systems, Springer, New York
21. Barranco A, Borras A, Gonzalez-Elipe AR, Palmero A (2016) Perspectives on oblique angle deposition of thin films: from fundamentals to devices. Prog Mater Sci 76:59–15310.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.06.003 ↗
22. Lintymer J, Gavoille J, Martin N, Takadoum J (2003) Glancing angle deposition to modify microstructure and properties of sputter deposited chromium thin films. Surf Coat Technol 174–175:316–32310.1016/S0257-8972(03)00413-4 ↗
23. Lintymer J, Martin N, Chappé JM, Delobelle P, Takadoum J (2004) Influence of zigzag microstructure on mechanical and electrical properties of chromium multilayered thin films. Surf Coat Technol 180–181:26–3210.1016/j.surfcoat.2003.10.027 ↗
24. Lintymer J, Martin N, Chappé JM, Takadoum J (2008) Glancing angle deposition to control microstructure and roughness of chromium thin films. Wear 264:444–44910.1016/j.wear.2006.08.036 ↗
25. Hawkeye MM, Taschuk MT, Brett MJ (eds) (2014) Chapter 5: glancing angle deposition optical films. In: Glancing angle deposition of thin films: engineering the nanoscale. Wiley, Chichester10.1002/9781118847510 ↗
26. Merkel JJ, Sontheimer T, Rech B, Becker C (2013) Directional growth and crystallization of silicon thin films prepared by electron-beam evaporation on oblique and textured surfaces. J Cryst Growth 367:126–13010.1016/j.jcrysgro.2012.12.037 ↗
27. Yu P, Chang CH, Chiu CH, Yang CS, Yu JC, Kuo HC, Hsu SH, Chang YC (2009) Efficiency enhancement of GaAs photovoltaics employing antireflective indium tin oxide nanocolumns. Adv Mater 21:1618–162110.1002/adma.200802563 ↗
28. Yildiz A, Cansizoglu H, Turkoz M, Abdulrahman R, Al-Hilo A, Cansizoglu MF, Demirkan TM, Karabacak T (2015) Glancing angle deposited Al-doped ZnO nanostructures with different structural and optical properties. Thin Solid Films 589:764–76910.1016/j.tsf.2015.06.058 ↗
29. Malac M, Egerton RF, Brett MJ, Dick B (1999) Fabrication of submicrometer regular arrays of pillars and helices. J Vac Sci Technol B 17:2671–267410.1116/1.591046 ↗
30. Seto MW, Robbie K, Vick D, Brett MJ, Kuhn L (1999) Mechanical response of thin films with helical microstructures. J Vac Sci Technol 17:2172–217710.1116/1.590887 ↗
31. Seto MW, Dick B, Brett MJ (2001) Microsprings and microcantilevers: studies of mechanical response. J Micromech Microeng 11:582–58810.1088/0960-1317/11/5/322 ↗
32. Hirakata H, Matsumoto S, Takemura M, Suzuki M, Kitamura T (2007) Anisotropic deformation of thin films comprised of helical springs. Int J Solids Struct 44:4030–403810.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.11.005 ↗
33. Sumigawa T, Hirakata H, Takemura M, Matsumoto S, Suzuki M, Kitamura T (2008) Disappearance of stress singularity at interface edge due to nanostructured thin film. Eng Fract Mech 75:3073–308310.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.12.010 ↗
34. Liu DL, Ye DX, Khan F, Tang F, Lim BK, Picu RC, Wang GC, Lu TM (2006) Mechanics of patterned helical Si springs on a Si substrate. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 3:492–49510.1166/jnn.2003.235 ↗
35. Antartis DA, Mott RN, Chasiotis I (2017) Tuning of helical nanostructures for ultra-compliant interfaces, in review
36. Jonnalagadda K, Chasiotis I, Yagnamurthy S, Lambros J, Polcawich R, Pulskamp J, Dubey M (2010) Experimental investigation of strain rate dependence in nanocrystalline Pt films. Exp Mech 50:25–3510.1007/s11340-008-9212-7 ↗
37. Naraghi M, Chasiotis I, Dzenis Y, Wen Y, Kahn H (2007) Novel method for mechanical characterization of polymeric nanofibers. Rev Sci Instrum 78:0851081–085108610.1063/1.2771092 ↗
38. Naraghi M, Chasiotis I (2009) Optimization of comb-driven devices for mechanical testing of polymeric nanofibers subjected to large deformations. J Microelectromech Syst 18:1032–104610.1109/JMEMS.2009.2026944 ↗