journal article·2017-05

Effect of stamping deformation on microstructure and properties evolution of an Al–Mg–Si–Cu alloy for automotive panels

Mingjun Yang, Siliang Liu, Xuwen He, Jiong Wang, Yi Kong, Pizhi Zhao, Kai Li, Yong Du

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 52· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

The effect of 5 % tensile deformation, which simulates the stamping process of Al–Mg–Si–Cu automotive outer panels, on the microstructural evolution during age strengthening, has been investigated. In addition, its benefit on key mechanical properties including hardness, yield strength, ductility, and corrosion resistance has been linked to the microstructural features. It was found that the aging precipitation sequence, SSSS → clusters and G.P. zones → β″ → β′ + Q′ → Q, was not influenced by the dislocations introduced through the stamping deformation prior to aging. On the other hand, stamping deformation could promote the formation of precipitates and refine the precipitates because of the enhanced heterogeneous nucleation and the accelerated precipitation kinetics, leading to superior strength of the alloy at the early stage. Meanwhile, the larger amount of Cu incorporated into nanoprecipitates leads to better intergranular corrosion resistance of the stamped alloy compared with the unstamped one. Due to the reduction in free Si amount at grain boundaries, the formation of fine subgrain structures and the increase of dislocation accumulation, the ductility of the stamped alloy was increased.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Hirsch J (1997) Aluminium alloys for automotive application. Mater Sci Forum 242:33–50. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.242.3310.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.242.33 ↗
2. Hirsch J (2004) Automotive trends in aluminium—the European perspective. Mater Forum 28:15–23
3. Warner T (2006) Recently-developed aluminium solutions for aerospace applications. Mater Sci Forum 519–521:1271–1278. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.519-521.127110.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.519-521.1271 ↗
4. Sakurai T (2008) The latest trends in aluminum alloys sheets for automotive body panels. Kobelco Technol Rev 28:22–28
5. Hirsch J (2011) Aluminium in innovative light-weight car design. Mater Trans 52(5):818–824. doi: 10.2320/matertrans.L-MZ20113210.2320/matertrans.L-MZ201132 ↗
6. Kim J, Daniel Marioara C, Holmestad R, Kobayashi E, Sato T (2013) Effects of Cu and Ag additions on age-hardening behavior during multi-step aging in Al–Mg–Si alloys. Mater Sci Eng, A 560:154–162. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2012.09.05110.1016/j.msea.2012.09.051 ↗
7. Teichmann K, Marioara CD, Andersen SJ, Marthinsen K (2013) TEM study of β′ precipitate interaction mechanisms with dislocations and β′ interfaces with the aluminium matrix in Al–Mg–Si alloys. Mater Charact 75:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2012.10.00310.1016/j.matchar.2012.10.003 ↗
8. Svenningsen G, Lein JE, Bjørgum A, Nordlien JH, Yu Y, Nisancioglu K (2006) Effect of low copper content and heat treatment on intergranular corrosion of model AlMgSi alloys. Corros Sci 48(1):226–242. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2004.11.02510.1016/j.corsci.2004.11.025 ↗
9. Larsen MH, Walmsley JC, Lunder O, Mathiesen RH, Nisancioglu K (2008) Intergranular corrosion of copper-containing AA6xxx AlMgSi aluminum alloys. J Electrochem Soc 155(11):550–556. doi: 10.1149/1.297677410.1149/1.2976774 ↗
10. Larsen MH, Walmsley JC, Lunder O, Nisancioglu K (2010) Effect of excess silicon and small copper content on intergranular corrosion of 6000-series aluminum alloys. J Electrochem Soc 157(2):C61–C68. doi: 10.1149/1.326180410.1149/1.3261804 ↗
11. Marioara CD, Andersen SJ, Jansen J, Zandbergen HW (2003) The influence of temperature and storage time at RT on nucleation of the β″ phase in a 6082 Al–Mg–Si alloy. Acta Mater 51(3):789–796. doi: 10.1016/s1359-6454(02)00470-610.1016/s1359-6454(02)00470-6 ↗
12. De Geuser F, Lefebvre W, Blavette D (2006) 3D atom probe study of solute atoms clustering during natural ageing and pre-ageing of an Al–Mg–Si alloy. Philos Mag Lett 86(4):227–234. doi: 10.1080/0950083060064327010.1080/09500830600643270 ↗
13. Serizawa A, Hirosawa S, Sato T (2006) 3DAP Characterization and thermal stability of nano-scale clusters in Al–Mg–Si alloys. Mater Sci Forum 519–521:245–250. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.519-521.24510.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.519-521.245 ↗
14. Birol Y (2005) Pre-aging to improve bake hardening in a twin-roll cast Al–Mg–Si alloy. Mater Sci Eng, A 391(1–2):175–180. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2004.08.06910.1016/j.msea.2004.08.069 ↗
15. He L, Zhang H, Cui J (2010) Effects of pre-ageing treatment on subsequent artificial ageing characteristics of an Al-1.01 Mg-0.68 Si-1.78 Cu alloy. J Mater Sci Technol 26(2):141–145. doi: 10.1016/S1005-0302(10)60023-010.1016/S1005-0302(10)60023-0 ↗
16. Ding L, He Y, Wen Z, Zhao P, Jia Z, Liu Q (2015) Optimization of the pre-aging treatment for an AA6022 alloy at various temperatures and holding times. J Alloys Compd 647:238–244. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.05.18810.1016/j.jallcom.2015.05.188 ↗
17. Birol Y, Karlik M (2006) The interaction of natural ageing with straining in a twin-roll cast AlMgSi automotive sheet. Scr Mater 55(7):625–628. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.06.00910.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.06.009 ↗
18. Masuda T, Takaki Y, Sakurai T, Hirosawa S (2010) Combined effect of pre-straining and pre-aging on bake-hardening behavior of an Al-0.6 mass% Mg-1.0 mass% Si alloy. Mater Trans 51(2):325–332. doi: 10.2320/matertrans.L-M200983110.2320/matertrans.L-M2009831 ↗
19. Yassar RS, Field DP, Weiland H (2005) The effect of predeformation on the β″ and β′ precipitates and the role of Q′ phase in an Al–Mg–Si alloy; AA6022. Scr Mater 53(3):299–303. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.04.01310.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.04.013 ↗
20. Teichmann K, Marioara CD, Andersen SJ, Pedersen KO, Gulbrandsen-Dahl S, Kolar M, Holmestad R, Marthinsen K (2011) HRTEM study of the effect of deformation on the early precipitation behaviour in an AA6060 Al–Mg–Si alloy. Phil Mag 91(28):3744–3754. doi: 10.1080/14786435.2011.59357710.1080/14786435.2011.593577 ↗
21. Teichmann K, Marioara CD, Andersen SJ, Marthinsen K (2012) The effect of preaging deformation on the precipitation behavior of an Al–Mg–Si alloy. Metall Mater Trans A 43(11):4006–4014. doi: 10.1007/s11661-012-1235-010.1007/s11661-012-1235-0 ↗
22. Teichmann K, Marioara CD, Pedersen KO, Marthinsen K (2013) The effect of simultaneous deformation and annealing on the precipitation behaviour and mechanical properties of an Al–Mg–Si alloy. Mater Sci Eng, A 565:228–235. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2012.12.04210.1016/j.msea.2012.12.042 ↗
23. Gupta A, Lloyd D, Bull M (1996) The properties and characteristics of two new aluminum automotive closure panel materials. SAE Technical Paper10.4271/960164 ↗
24. Standard BS 11846:1995 (1995) Determination of resistance to IGC of solution heat-treatable aluminium alloys. British Standards Institution
25. Serizawa A, Hirosawa S, Sato T (2008) Three-dimensional atom probe characterization of nanoclusters responsible for multistep aging behavior of an Al–Mg–Si alloy. Metall Mater Trans A 39(2):243–251. doi: 10.1007/s11661-007-9438-510.1007/s11661-007-9438-5 ↗
26. Kim J, Kim S, Kobayashi E, Sato T (2014) Thermal stability and transition behavior of nanoclusters during two-step aging at 250 °C in Al–Mg–Si(–Cu) alloys. Mater Trans 55(5):768–773. doi: 10.2320/matertrans.M201341110.2320/matertrans.M2013411 ↗
27. Vissers R, van Huis MA, Jansen J, Zandbergen HW, Marioara CD, Andersen SJ (2007) The crystal structure of the β′ phase in Al–Mg–Si alloys. Acta Mater 55(11):3815–3823. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.02.03210.1016/j.actamat.2007.02.032 ↗
28. Sha G, Möller H, Stumpf WE, Xia JH, Govender G, Ringer SP (2012) Solute nanostructures and their strengthening effects in Al–7Si–0.6 Mg alloy F357. Acta Mater 60(2):692–701. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.10.02910.1016/j.actamat.2011.10.029 ↗
29. Li K, Song M, Du Y, Zhang H (2011) Simulation of the electron diffraction patterns from needle/rod-like precipitates in Al–Mg–Si alloys. Mater Charact 62(9):894–903. doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2011.06.00610.1016/j.matchar.2011.06.006 ↗
30. Yang W, Wang M, Sheng X, Zhang Q, Huang L (2011) Precipitate characteristics and selected area diffraction patterns of the β′ and Q′ precipitates in Al–Mg–Si–Cu alloys. Philos Mag Lett 91(2):150–160. doi: 10.1080/09500839.2010.54116510.1080/09500839.2010.541165 ↗
31. Quainoo GK, Yannacopoulos S (2004) The effect of cold work on the precipitation kinetics of AA6111 aluminum. J Mater Sci 39(21):6495–650210.1023/B:JMSC.0000044888.01854.e1 ↗
32. Wang Z, Li H, Miao F, Fang B, Song R, Zheng Z (2014) Improving the strength and ductility of Al–Mg–Si–Cu alloys by a novel thermo-mechanical treatment. Mater Sci Eng, A 607:313–317. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2014.04.00910.1016/j.msea.2014.04.009 ↗
33. Remøe MS (2014) The effect of alloying elements on the ductility of Al–Mg–Si alloys. Master's dissertation, Norwegian University, Institutt for materialteknologi
34. Zhao YH, Liao XZ, Cheng S, Ma E, Zhu YT (2006) Simultaneously Increasing the ductility and strength of nanostructured alloys. Adv Mater 18(17):2280–2283. doi: 10.1002/adma.20060031010.1002/adma.200600310 ↗
35. Prillhofer R, Rank G, Berneder J, Antrekowitsch H, Uggowitzer P, Pogatscher S (2014) Property criteria for automotive Al–Mg–Si sheet alloys. Materials 7(7):5047–5068. doi: 10.3390/ma707504710.3390/ma7075047 ↗
36. Holmestad J, Ervik M, Marioara CD, Walmsley JC (2014) Investigation of grain boundaries in an Al–Mg–Si–Cu ALLOY. Mater Sci Forum 794–796:951–956. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.794-796.95110.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.794-796.951 ↗
37. Sha G, Yao L, Liao X, Ringer SP, Chao Duan Z, Langdon TG (2011) Segregation of solute elements at grain boundaries in an ultrafine grained Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy. Ultramicroscopy 111(6):500–505. doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2010.11.01310.1016/j.ultramic.2010.11.013 ↗