journal article·2014-01

The importance of creep strain in linking together the Wilshire equations for minimum creep rates and times to various strains (including the rupture strain): an illustration using 1CrMoV rotor steel

Mark Evans

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 49· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

This paper highlights the observation that the Wilshire equations for failure times and times to various strains, as reported in the original literature, may not be the most appropriate ones for all materials—including the one selected in this study. Further, such appropriateness can be determined by looking at the consistencies between the parameter estimates obtained using minimum creep rates in comparison to using failure times. It is shown, using 1CrMoV steel as an illustration, that the parameter consistency can be achieved by generalising the Monkman–Grant relation so that it contains a temperature correction. Indeed, the ability of the Wilshire equations to produce meaningful physical parameters, such as the activation energy, is shown to be highly dependent upon a valid specification for the Monkman–Grant relation. It is shown that variations in the measured values for some of the Wilshire parameters (w and k 3) with strain indicate that the causes of deformation are different at different strains and different stresses. Finally, the measured variations in the parameters of the Monkman–Grant relation with strain enable accurate interpolated and extrapolated creep curves to be calculated for any test condition.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: High Temperature Alloys and Creep · Fire effects on concrete materials · Fatigue and fracture mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (17)

Show source-provided references
1. Kern TU, Staubli M, Zeiler G, Finali A, Donth B (2003) The European material development within COST 522 for 923 K USC Power Plants, Proceedings of the 15th Forge Masters Meeting, Kobe, p 244
2. Allen D, Garwood S (2007) Energy materials—strategic research agenda. Materials energy review, IOMMM
3. Wilshire B, Battenbough AJ (2007) Mater Sci Eng A A443:15610.1016/j.msea.2006.08.094 ↗
4. Wilshire B, Scharning PJ (2008) Mater Sci Technol 24(1):110.1179/174328407X245779 ↗
5. Wilshire B, Whittaker M (2011) Mater Sci Technol 27(3):64210.1179/026708310X520529 ↗
6. Wilshire B, Scharning PJ (2008) Int Mater Rev 53(2):9110.1179/174328008X254349 ↗
7. Abdallah A, Perkins K, Williams S (2012) Mater Sci Eng A 550:17610.1016/j.msea.2012.04.054 ↗
8. Monkman FC, Grant NJ (1963) In: Grant NJ, Mullendore AW (eds) Deformation and fracture at elevated temperature. MIT Press, Boston
9. Evans RW, Wilshire B (1985) Creep of metals and alloys. The Institute of Materials, London
10. Evans RW, Willis MR, Wilshire B, Holdsworth S, Senior B, Fleming A, Spindler M, Williams JA (1993) In: Wilshire B, Evans RW (eds.) Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on creep and fracture of materials and structures, Swansea, The Institute of Materials, London, 1993 p. 633
11. Dorn JE (1955) J Mech Phys Solids 3:8510.1016/0022-5096(55)90054-5 ↗
12. Norton FH (1929) The creep of steel at high temperatures. McGraw-Hill, London
13. Whittaker MT, Evans M, Wilshire B (2012) Mater Sci Eng A 552:14510.1016/j.msea.2012.05.023 ↗
14. Evans M (2010) Mater Sci Technol 26(3):30910.1179/174328409X407515 ↗
15. National Institute for Materials Science (NIMS) (1990) Creep Data Sheet No. 9b
16. Dunand DC, Han BQ, Jansen AM (1999) Metall Mater Trans A 30(13):82910.1007/s11661-999-1016-6 ↗
17. Harrison W, Whittaker M, Williams S (2013) Materials 6:111810.3390/ma6031118 ↗