The effect of contamination on the metallurgy of commercially pure titanium welded with a pulsed laser beam
Source abstract
Abstract
Commercially pure titanium components in medical devices are commonly joined using pulsed laser welding because of the precision, low heat input and low thermal distortion it affords. Despite the importance of this technique in structural components, such as dental prosthesis, there is still a limited understanding of the factors which affect the weld metallurgy. In this study the effect of O, N and Fe on the weld metallurgy, as both external and bulk contaminants, is investigated. The results indicate that Fe has the most pronounced effect on the nature of the allotropic β-α phase transformation, suppressing the massive transformation and encouraging the formation of martensite. This finding is in contrast to the effects of O and N which are usually the subject of studies reported in the literature. Whilst O and N do cause more hardening than Fe, this seems to be mainly through more pronounced solid solution strengthening. The study also demonstrates the inadequacy of relying on ASTM grades to predict weld properties and the need to adequately characterise the base alloys. © 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Dental materials and restorations · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. Schneider R (2009) J Esthet Restor Dent 21:21510.1111/j.1708-8240.2009.00265.x ↗
2. Waurzyniak P (2010) Manuf Eng 144:59
3. Anselm Wiskott HW, Doumas T, Scherrer SS, Belser UC (2001) J Mater Sci Mater M 12:71910.1023/A:1011224710916 ↗
4. Asahina T, Itoh Y (2005) J Jpn I Light Met 55:33710.2464/jilm.55.337 ↗
5. Richter K, Behr W, Reisgen U (2007) Materialwiss Werkst 38:5110.1002/mawe.200600095 ↗
6. Liu J, Watanabe I, Yoshida K, Atsuta M (2002) Dent Mater 18:14310.1016/S0109-5641(01)00033-1 ↗
7. Wang R, Welsch G (1995) J Prosthet Dent 74:52110.1016/S0022-3913(05)80356-7 ↗
8. Yamagishi T, Ito M, Fujimura Y (1993) J Prosthet Dent 70:26410.1016/0022-3913(93)90063-T ↗
9. Huang HH, Lin SC, Lee HK, Chen C (2005) J Mater Sci 40:789. doi: 10.1007/s10853-005-6325-610.1007/s10853-005-6325-6 ↗
10. Li X, Xie J, Zhou Y (2005) J Mater Sci 40:3437. doi: 10.1007/s10853-005-0447-810.1007/s10853-005-0447-8 ↗
11. Fujioka S, Kakimoto K, Inoue T, Okazaki J, Komasa Y (2003) Dent Mater J 22:58110.4012/dmj.22.581 ↗
12. Oh M, Lee JY, Park JK (2004) Metall Mater Trans A 35:307110.1007/s11661-004-0052-5 ↗
13. Chon SH, Park JK (2005) In: Proceedings of an international conference on solid-solid phase transformations in inorganic materials. Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, Phoenix, p 755
14. Cormier M, Claisse F (1974) J Less Common Met 34:18110.1016/0022-5088(74)90158-1 ↗
15. Nakajima H, Koiwa M (1991) ISIJ International 31:75710.2355/isijinternational.31.757 ↗
16. Plichta M, Williams JC, Aaronson H (1977) Metall Trans A 8:188510.1007/BF02646561 ↗
17. Hillert M, Sundman B (1976) Acta Mater 24:73110.1016/0001-6160(76)90108-5 ↗