journal article·2013-09

Evaluation of compressive strength of hardening silica fume blended concrete

Xiao-Yong Wang

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 48· Issue 17
Publisher page

Abstract

Silica fume (SF) is a byproduct of induction arc furnaces and has long been used as a mineral admixture to produce high-strength and high-performance concrete. Owing to the pozzolanic reaction between calcium hydroxide and SF, compared with Portland cement, the hydration of concrete containing SF is much more complex. In this paper, by considering the production of calcium hydroxide in cement hydration and its consumption in the pozzolanic reaction, a numerical model is proposed to simulate the hydration of concrete containing SF. The degree of hydration of cement and degree of reaction of SF are obtained as accompanied results from the proposed hydration model. Furthermore, on the basis of the volume stoichiometries, mixing proportions and the degree of reactions of cement and SF, the gel–space ratio of hydrating blended concrete is calculated. Finally, the development of compressive strength of SF blended concrete is evaluated through Powers’ strength theory considering the contributions of cement hydration and SF reaction. The proposed model is verified through experimental data on concrete with different water-to-cement ratios and SF substitution ratios.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Concrete Properties and Behavior · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (17)

Show source-provided references
1. Land G, Stephan D (2012) J Mater Sci 47(2):1011. doi: 10.1007/s10853-011-5881-110.1007/s10853-011-5881-1 ↗
2. Bentz DP, Jensen OM, Coats AM, Glasser FP (2000) Cem Concr Res 30(6):95310.1016/S0008-8846(00)00264-7 ↗
3. Papadakis VG (1999) Cem Concr Res 29(1):7910.1016/S0008-8846(98)00171-9 ↗
4. Papadakis VG, Tsimas S (2000) Cem Concr Res 30(2):29110.1016/S0008-8846(99)00249-5 ↗
5. Papadakis VG, Pedersen EJ, Lindgreen H (1999) J Mater Sci 34(4):683. doi: 10.1023/A:100450032474410.1023/A:1004500324744 ↗
6. Zelic J, Rusic D, Krstulovic R (2004) Cem Concr Res 34(12):231910.1016/j.cemconres.2004.04.015 ↗
7. Swaddiwudhipong S, Wu H, Zhang MH (2003) Adv Cem Res 15(4):16110.1680/adcr.2003.15.4.161 ↗
8. Ishida T, Luan Y, Sagawa T, Nawa T (2011) Cem Concr Res 41(12):135710.1016/j.cemconres.2011.06.005 ↗
9. Ishida T, Maekawa K, Kishi T (2007) Cem Concr Res 37(4):56510.1016/j.cemconres.2006.11.015 ↗
10. Song HW, Jang JC, Saraswathy V, Byun KJ (2007) Build Environ 42(3):135810.1016/j.buildenv.2005.11.019 ↗
11. Tomosawa F (1997) In: Proceedings of the 10th international congress on the chemistry of cement, Harald Justnes Publisher, Gothenburg, 1997 p 51
12. Park KB, Jee NY, Yoon IS, Lee HS (2008) ACI Mater J 105(2):180
13. Saeki T, Monteiro PJM (2005) Cem Concr Res 35(10):191410.1016/j.cemconres.2004.11.018 ↗
14. Pane I, Hansen W (2005) Cem Concr Res 35(6):115510.1016/j.cemconres.2004.10.027 ↗
15. Jensen OM, Hansen PF (2001) Cem Concr Res 31(4):64710.1016/S0008-8846(01)00463-X ↗
16. Lam L, Wong YL, Poon CS (2000) Cem Concr Res 30(5):74710.1016/S0008-8846(00)00213-1 ↗
17. Wang XY, Lee HS, Park KB (2009) ACI Mater J 106(2):167