The effect of annealing temperature on the properties of ZnO films with preferential nonpolar plane orientation by SSCVD
Source abstract
Abstract
The effect of annealing temperature on the structural morphology and optical properties of preferential nonpolar plane orientated ZnO thin films on Si (100) substrates by single source chemical vapor deposition (SSCVD) was investigated. The structural and morphological properties of the films were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and atomic force microscope (AFM) measurements respectively. All the ZnO films annealed at the selected temperatures (500–800 °C) exhibiting a–b axis orientation, but with preferential nonpolar (100) plane orientation. It is found that the intensity of the (100) peak depends strongly on the annealing temperature, while that of (101) peak shows a variation in a very small scale. The surface morphology demonstrates that the film is of the uniform grains except for that annealed at 800 °C, for the aggregation of the ZnO particles occurred. The film shows a superior smooth surface annealed at 600 and 700 °C in comparison with other thermal annealed. It is also found from the photoluminescence(PL) measurements that the film annealed at 700 °C exhibits the lowest deep-level emission(DLE). However, the intensity of the near band edge emissions (NBE) and DLE show a wavelike variation, which are consistent to the variation of the intensity of (100) peak in the XRD results.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: ZnO doping and properties · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · Ga2O3 and related materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. Ye ZZ, Ma DW, He Jh et al (2003) J Cryst Growth 256:7810.1016/S0022-0248(03)01314-9 ↗
2. Bagnall D, Chen Y, Zhu Z, Yao T, Koyama S, Shen M, Golo T (1997) Appl Phys Lett 70:223010.1063/1.118824 ↗
3. Lu YM, Hwang WS, Liu WY, Yang JS (2001) Mater Chem Phys 72:26910.1016/S0254-0584(01)00450-3 ↗
4. Cao H, Wu JY, Ong HC, Dai UY, Chang RPH (1999) Appl Phys lett 73:57210.1063/1.121859 ↗
5. Gorla C, Emanetoglu N, Liang S, Mayo W, Lu Y, Wraback M, Shen H (2000) J Appl Phys 85:259510.1063/1.369577 ↗
6. Sang B, Kushiya K, Okumura D, Yamase O (2001) Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 67:23710.1016/S0927-0248(00)00287-7 ↗
7. Rugge A, Becker JS, Gordon RG, Tolbert SH (2003) Nano Lett 3:129310.1021/nl034362r ↗
8. King JS, Neff CW, Summers CJ, Park W, Blomquist S, Forsythe E, Morton D (2003) Appl Phys Lett 83:256610.1063/1.1609240 ↗
9. Petrella AJ, Deng H, Roberts NK, Lamb RN (2002) Chem Mater 14(10):433910.1021/cm0204324 ↗
10. Deng H, Gong B, Petrella AJ, Russell JJ, Lamb RN (2003) Sci China, Ser E 46(4):35510.1360/02ye0313 ↗
11. Deng H, Russell JJ, Lanb RN et al (2004) Thin Solid Films 458:4310.1016/j.tsf.2003.11.288 ↗
12. Zhang XT, Liu YC, Zhang LG, Zhang JY et al (2002) J Appl Phys 92:329310.1063/1.1498958 ↗
13. Fang ZB, Yan ZJ, Tan YS, Liu XQ, Wang YY (2005) Appl Surf Sci 241:30310.1016/j.apsusc.2004.07.056 ↗
14. Yang WZ, Zhong HL, Jie Z, Jie S, Jun WZ (2005) Vacuum 78:5310.1016/j.vacuum.2004.12.014 ↗
15. Lifshitz IM, Slyozov VV (1961) J Phys Chem Solids 19:3510.1016/0022-3697(61)90054-3 ↗
16. Tan ST, Sun XW, Zhang XH, Chua SJ, Chen BJ, Teo CC (2006) J Appl Phys 100:03350210.1063/1.2218468 ↗
17. Vanheusden K, Seager CH, Warren WL, Tallant DR, Voigt JA (1999) Appl Phys Lett 68:40310.1063/1.116699 ↗
18. Zhang SB, Wei SH, Zunger A (2001) Phys Rev B 63:07520510.1103/PhysRevB.63.075205 ↗