journal article·2009-03

Microstructure–properties relationship in ceramic–elastomer composites with 3D connectivity of phases

Kamil Babski, Anna Boczkowska, Krzysztof J. Kurzydlowski

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 44· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

The ceramic–elastomer composites with 3D phase connectivity were tested under compressive loads. Such composites exhibit high initial strength and stiffness with the ability to sustain large deformations. Samples of the composites were made of porous SiO2 ceramic matrix infiltrated by polyurethane elastomer. The ceramic matrix preforms used differed in the porosity and three different composite microstructures have been obtained. Selected parameters of microstructure composites were evaluated using image analysis. The compressive strength and capacity for energy absorption are characterized under various strain rates (0.001–235 s−1). It was found that stress–strain characteristic depends on the strain rate and the specific interface area (Sv). Pore size and the specific interface area have a strong effect on the compressive strength of composites and these parameters can be used for tailoring their mechanical properties. The acoustic emission was applied to identify stages in the process of microstructure damage during compression. The interpretation of damage stages was proposed, which also explains the character of the stress–strain curves.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Cellular and Composite Structures · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (17)

Show source-provided references
1. Chen Y-C, Wu S (2004) Ceram Int 30:6910.1016/S0272-8842(03)00064-6 ↗
2. Cui C, Baugmann RH, Iqbal Z, Dahlstrom DK (1997) Synth Mater 85:139110.1016/S0379-6779(97)80287-1 ↗
3. Kalita SJ, Bose S, Hosick HL, Bandyopadhyay A (2003) Mater Sci Eng C 23:61110.1016/S0928-4931(03)00052-3 ↗
4. Koza E, Leonowicz M, Wojciechowski S, Simancik F (2003) Mater Lett 58:13210.1016/S0167-577X(03)00430-0 ↗
5. Yang IY, Lee KS, Park SG, Cha CS (2007) J Mater Process Technol 187–188:13610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.140 ↗
6. Xue P, Yu TX, Tao XM (2000) Composites Part A 31:86110.1016/S1359-835X(00)00023-3 ↗
7. Mahadi E, Hamouda AMS, Sahari BB, Khalid YA (2003) Appl Compos Mater 10:6710.1023/A:1022890104728 ↗
8. Woldesenbet E, Gupta N, Jadhav A (2005) J Mater Sci 40:4009. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-005-1910-210.1007/s10853-005-1910-2 ↗
9. Gupta N (2007) Mater Lett 61:97910.1016/j.matlet.2006.06.033 ↗
10. Lee DG, Lim TS, Cheon SS (2000) Compos Struct 50:38110.1016/S0263-8223(00)00117-3 ↗
11. Boczkowska A, Babski K, Konopka K, Kurzydłowski KJ (2006) Mater Charact 56:38910.1016/j.matchar.2005.11.014 ↗
12. Konopka K, Boczkowska A, Batorski K, Szafran M, Kurzydłowski KJ (2004) Mater Lett 58:385710.1016/j.matlet.2004.07.025 ↗
13. Kurzydlowski KJ, Ralph B (1995) Quantitative description of microstructure of materials. CRC Press, Boca Raton
14. Podrezov YM, Firstov SO, Szafran M, Kurzydłowski KJ (2003) E-MRS Fall Meeting 2003 Conference, Poland
15. Wang EZ, Shrive NG (1995) Eng Fract Mech 52(6):110710.1016/0013-7944(95)00069-8 ↗
16. Blechman I (1997) Int J Solids Struct 34(20):2536
17. Boczkowska A, Konopka K, Schmidt J, Kurzydłowski KJ (2004) Composites 4(9):41