Deformation under combined compression and shear: a new kinematic solution
Source abstract
Abstract
The conventional model of compression test, cylindrical profile model (CPM), ignores shearing deformation in the sample and yields an unrealistic solution. This article presents a new kinematic model and a closed-form solution for barrelled compression test. This model, exponential profile model (EPM), accounts for shear deformation in the test sample and provides a foundation to develop a detailed constitutive framework. To benchmark EPM, example solutions of the test are performed using a finite element model. The example results are compared with those of CPM. It is shown that CPM cannot evaluate the test’s real and non-uniform deformation. It is also shown that EPM’s predictions comply reasonably well with the finite element results. The importance of the presented solution can be better understood by noting that closed-form solutions of the mechanical tests are the most convenient routes to post process the raw test data and eventually to characterize the sample’s material. It is concluded that EPM is a far more reliable platform compared to CPM for meaningful interpretations of the test results.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Swab JJ, Meredith CS, Casem DT, Gamble WR (2017) Static and dynamic compression strength of hot-pressed boron carbide using a dumbbell-shaped specimen. J Mater Sci 52:10073–10084. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1210-710.1007/s10853-017-1210-7 ↗
2. Zambrano OA (2018) A general perspective of Fe–Mn–Al–C steels. J Mater Sci 53:14003–14062. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2551-610.1007/s10853-018-2551-6 ↗
3. Song R, Ponge D, Raabe D (2005) Mechanical properties of an ultrafine grained C–Mn steel processed by warm deformation and annealing. Acta Mater 53:4881–489210.1016/j.actamat.2005.07.009 ↗
4. Sander J, Hufenbach J, Bleckmann M et al (2017) Selective laser melting of ultra-high-strength TRIP steel: processing, microstructure, and properties. J Mater Sci 52:4944–4956. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-0731-910.1007/s10853-016-0731-9 ↗
5. Deng GY, Lu C, Tieu AK, Su LH, Huynh NN, Liu XH (2010) Crystal plasticity investigation of friction effect on texture evolution of Al single crystal during ECAP. J Mater Sci 45:4711–4717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-010-4674-210.1007/s10853-010-4674-2 ↗
6. Rowe GW (1979) Elements of metalworking theory. E. Arnold, London
7. Wang W, Pan Q, Sun Y, Wang X, Li A, Song W (2018) Study on hot compressive deformation behaviors and corresponding industrial extrusion of as-homogenized Al–7.82 Zn–1.96 Mg–2.35 Cu–0.11 Zr alloy. J Mater Sci 53:11728–11748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2388-z10.1007/s10853-018-2388-z ↗
8. Baskaran K, Narayanasamy R, Arunachalam S (2007) Effect of friction factor on barrelling in elliptical shaped billets during cold upset forging. J Mater Sci 42:7630–7642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-007-1900-710.1007/s10853-007-1900-7 ↗
9. Avitzur B (1980) Metal forming: the application of limit analysis. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York
10. Ebrahimi R, Najafizadeh A (2004) A new method for evaluation of friction in bulk metal forming. J Mater Process Technol 152:136–14310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.03.029 ↗
11. Solhjoo S (2010) A note on “Barrel Compression Test”: a method for evaluation of friction. Comput Mater Sci 49:435–43810.1016/j.commatsci.2010.04.047 ↗
12. Khoddam S, Hodgson PD (2017) Advancing mechanics of barrelling compression test. Mech Mater 122:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2018.04.00310.1016/j.mechmat.2018.04.003 ↗
13. Dieter GE, Kuhn HA, Semiatin SL (2003) Handbook of workability and process design. ASM International, Metals Park
14. Dusunceli N, Colak OU, Filiz C (2010) Determination of material parameters of a viscoplastic model by genetic algorithm. Mater Des 31:1250–125510.1016/j.matdes.2009.09.023 ↗
15. Morris GM, Goodsell DS, Halliday RS et al (1998) Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function. J Comput Chem 19:1639–166210.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(19981115)19:14<1639::AID-JCC10>3.0.CO;2-B ↗
16. Khoddam S, Hodgson PD, Bahramabadi MJ (2011) An inverse thermal–mechanical analysis of the hot torsion test for calibrating the constitutive parameters. Mater Des 32:1903–190910.1016/j.matdes.2010.12.010 ↗
17. Tonti E (2013) The mathematical structure of classical and relativistic physics. Springer, Berlin10.1007/978-1-4614-7422-7 ↗
18. Khoddam S (1997) Mechanical Engineering, Monash University, Melbourne
19. Lin YC, Liu Y-X, Chen M-S, Huang M-H, Ma X, Long Z-L (2016) Study of static recrystallization behavior in hot deformed Ni-based superalloy using cellular automaton model. Mater Des 99:107–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.05010.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.050 ↗
20. Baral P, Laurent-Brocq M, Guillonneau G, Bergheau J-M, Loubet J-L, Kermouche G (2018) In situ characterization of AA1050 recrystallization kinetics using high temperature nanoindentation testing. Mater Des 152:22–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.04.05310.1016/j.matdes.2018.04.053 ↗
21. Dehghan-Manshadi A, Hodgson PD (2008) Effect of δ-ferrite co-existence on hot deformation and recrystallization of austenite. J Mater Sci 43:6272–6286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-008-2907-410.1007/s10853-008-2907-4 ↗
22. Molaei S, Ebrahimi R, Abbasi Z (2016) Upper bound analysis of barrel compression test using a new velocity field. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Mech Eng 40:1–1010.1007/s40997-016-0003-y ↗
23. Wu Y, Dong X (2016) An upper bound model with continuous velocity field for strain inhomogeneity analysis in radial forging process. Int J Mech Sci 115–116:385–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.07.02510.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.07.025 ↗
24. Khoddam S, Solhjoo S, Hodgson PD (2018) Incremental profile modeling (in press)
25. Fardi M, Ibrahim R, Hodgson PD, Khoddam S (2017) A new horizon for barreling compression test: exponential profile modeling. J Adv Mater 19:1700328. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20170032810.1002/adem.201700328 ↗
26. Crisfield MA (1991) Non-linear finite element analysis of solids and structures: volume 1, essentials, vol 1. Wiley, Hoboken
27. Chen X, Li C, Wei XX (2016) Stress analysis of a hollow sphere compressed between two flat platens. Int J Mech Sci 118:67–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.09.01810.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.09.018 ↗
28. Taylor A (2009) Institute for Frontier Materials, Deakin, Waurn Ponds Campus (Personal Communication)
29. Ducobu F, Rivière-Lorphèvre E, Filippi E (2017) On the importance of the choice of the parameters of the Johnson–Cook constitutive model and their influence on the results of a Ti6Al4V orthogonal cutting model. Int J Mech Sci 122:143–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.01.00410.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.01.004 ↗