journal article·2010-08

Microstructure analysis of samples sintered at different gravitational conditions

Kathy Lu, Randall M. German

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 45· Issue 16
Publisher page

Abstract

Tungsten heavy alloy samples liquid phase sintered under normal gravity and microgravity conditions are examined in this study for microstructure, phase, grain orientation, and lattice misorientation comparison. The focus is on understanding gravitational effects on the microstructure evolution as a function of location in the samples sintered using different holding times. This analysis shows that gravity has sub-grain level effects. The main differences are observed at the grain boundaries and in the relative orientation of the touching grains. Microgravity sintering is conducive for solid grain rotation into low lattice misorientation angle arrangement and potentially coalescence.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced materials and composites · Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Lu K, German RM (2000) J Mater Sci 36:3385. doi: 10.1023/A:101794352487510.1023/A:1017943524875 ↗
2. Marx BM, Lu K, German RM (2001) Int J Powder Metall 37:11
3. Lu K, German RM, Iacocca RG (2001) Metall Mater Trans A 32A:209710.1007/s11661-001-0021-1 ↗
4. Johnson JL, Upadhyaya A, German RM (1998) Metall Mater Trans B 29B:85710.1007/s11663-998-0145-4 ↗
5. Tewari A, Gokhale AM, German RM (1999) Acta Mater 47:372110.1016/S1359-6454(99)00164-0 ↗
6. Johnson JL, Campbell LG, Park SJ, German RM (2009) Metall Mater Trans A 40:42610.1007/s11661-008-9745-5 ↗
7. Schwartz AJ, Kumar M, Adams BL (2000) Electron backscatter diffraction in materials science. Kluwer Academic, New York, NY10.1007/978-1-4757-3205-4 ↗
8. Randle V (2004) Int Mater Rev 49:110.1179/095066004225010514 ↗
9. Baba-Kishi KZ (2002) J Mater Sci 37:1715. doi: 10.1023/A:101496491667010.1023/A:1014964916670 ↗
10. Humphreys FJ (2001) J Mater Sci 36:3833. doi: 10.1023/A:101797343259210.1023/A:1017973432592 ↗
11. Dingley DJ, Randle V (1992) J Mater Sci 27:4545. doi: 10.1007/BF0116598810.1007/BF01165988 ↗
12. Dillon SJ, Rohrer GS (2009) J Am Ceram Soc 92:158010.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03064.x ↗
13. Zambaldi C, Zaefferer S, Wright SI (2000) J Appl Crystallogr 42:109210.1107/S0021889809036498 ↗
14. Hiwarkar VD, Sahoo SK, Krishna KVM, Samajdar I, Dey GK, Srivastav D, Tewari R, Banarjee S, Doherty RD (2009) Acta Mater 57:581210.1016/j.actamat.2009.08.007 ↗
15. Zou Y, Qin W, Irissou E, Legoux JG, Yue S, Szpunar JA (2009) Scr Mater 61:89910.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.07.020 ↗
16. Nowell MM, Witt RA, True B (2005) Microsc Microanal 11:2005
17. German RM (1995) Metall Mater Trans A 26:27910.1007/BF02664666 ↗
18. Guillermet AF, Ostlund L (1986) Metall Trans A 17:180910.1007/BF02817278 ↗
19. Brandes EA, Brook GB (1992) Smithells metals reference book. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, MA
20. Massalski TB, Murray JL, Bennett LH, Baker H, Kacprzak L (1986) Binary alloy phase diagrams. American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH