Biphasic scaffolds of polyvinyl alcohol with silk fibroin for oral and maxillofacial surgery based on mimicking materials design: fabrication, characterization, properties
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Silk-based biomaterials and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (74)
Show source-provided references
1. Tuna EB, Ozgen M, Cankaya AB, Sen C, Gencay K (2012) Oral rehabilitation in a patient with major maxillofacial trauma: a case management. Case Reports Dentistry 2012:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/26714310.1155/2012/267143 ↗
2. Lloyd, Stuart N., and William Cross. 2002. “European Urology Supplements The Current Use of Biomaterials in Urology.” 1:4–8.10.1016/S1569-9056(02)00146-X ↗
3. Nguyen C, Young S, Kretlow JD, Mikos AG, Wong M (2011) Surface characteristics of biomaterials used for space maintenance in a mandibular defect: a pilot animal study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69(1):11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2010.02.02610.1016/j.joms.2010.02.026 ↗
4. Gobbi, SJ 2019. “Requirements for Selection/Development of a Biomaterial. Biomedical. J Sci Techn Res https://doi.org/10.26717/bjstr.2019.14.002554.10.26717/bjstr.2019.14.002554 ↗
5. Nuss KMR, von Rechenberg B (2008) Biocompatibility issues with modern implants in bone—a review for clinical orthopedics. Open Orthopaedics J 2(1):66–78. https://doi.org/10.2174/187432500080201006610.2174/1874325000802010066 ↗
6. Khan F, Tanaka M (2018) designing smart biomaterials for tissue engineering. Int J Mol Sci 19(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms1901001710.3390/ijms19010017 ↗
7. O’Brien FJ (2011) Biomaterials & scaffolds for tissue engineering. Mater Today 14(3):88–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(11)70058-X10.1016/S1369-7021(11)70058-X ↗
8. Roffi A, Krishnakumar GS, Gostynska N, Kon E, Candrian C, Filardo G (2017) The role of three-dimensional scaffolds in treating long bone defects: evidence from preclinical and clinical literature—a systematic review. Biomed Res Int 2017:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/807417810.1155/2017/8074178 ↗
9. Chocholata P, Kulda V, Babuska V (2019) “Fabrication of scaffolds for bone-tissue regeneration. Materials. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1204056810.3390/ma12040568 ↗
10. Henkel J, Hutmacher DW (2013) Design and Fabrication of Scaffold-Based Tissue Engineering. BioNanoMaterials 14(3–4):171–193. https://doi.org/10.1515/bnm-2013-002110.1515/bnm-2013-0021 ↗
11. Thavornyutikarn, Boonlom, Nattapon Chantarapanich, Kriskrai Sitthiseripratip, George A. Thouas, and Qizhi Chen. 2014. Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffolding: Computer-Aided Scaffolding Techniques. Vol. 3.10.1007/s40204-014-0026-7 ↗
12. Melek LN (2015) Tissue engineering in oral and maxillofacial reconstruction. Tanta Dental J 12(3):211–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tdj.2015.05.00310.1016/j.tdj.2015.05.003 ↗
13. Kinoshita Y, Maeda H (2013) Recent developments of functional scaffolds for craniomaxillofacial bone tissue engineering Applications. Sci World J. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/86315710.1155/2013/863157 ↗
14. Panjapheree K, Kamonmattayakul S, Meesane J (2018) Biphasic scaffolds of silk fibroin film affixed to silk fibroin/chitosan sponge based on surgical design for cartilage defect in osteoarthritis. Mater Design 141:323–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.01.00610.1016/j.matdes.2018.01.006 ↗
15. Thangprasert A, Tansakul C, Thuaksubun N, Meesane J (2019) Mimicked hybrid hydrogel based on Gelatin/PVA for tissue engineering in subchondral bone interface for osteoarthritis surgery. Mater Design 183:108113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10811310.1016/j.matdes.2019.108113 ↗
16. The 15th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering: ICBME 2013, 4th to 7th December 2013, Singapore; Goh, J., Ed.; IFMBE Proceedings; Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2014; Vol. 43. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02913-9.10.1007/978-3-319-02913-9 ↗
17. Jamei E, Vrcelj Z (2021) Biomimicry and the built environment, learning from nature’s solutions. Appl Sci 11(16):7514. https://doi.org/10.3390/app1116751410.3390/app11167514 ↗
18. Chen DA, Ross BE, Klotz LE (2015) Lessons from a coral reef: biomimicry for structural engineers. J Struct Eng 141(4):0251400210.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001216 ↗
19. Jalil WDA, Kahachi HAH (2019) The implementation of nano-biomimicry for sustainability in architecture. J Eng Sustain Develop 23(3):25–41. https://doi.org/10.31272/jeasd.23.3.3.10.31272/jeasd.23.3.3. ↗
20. Bar-Cohen, Yoseph. 2005. “Biomimetics: Mimicking and Inspired-by Biology.” Smart Structures and Materials 2005: Electroactive Polymer Actuators and Devices (EAPAD) 5759:1. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.597436.10.1117/12.597436 ↗
21. Sangkert S, Kamolmatyakul S, Meesane J (2020) Mimicked scaffolds based on coated silk woven fabric with gelatin and chitosan for soft tissue defect in oral maxillofacial area. Int J Artif Organs 43(3):189–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/039139881987719110.1177/0391398819877191 ↗
22. Lawrence BJ, Madihall SV (2008) Cell colonization in degradable 3D porous matrices basics of porous structures importance of spatial architecture. Cell Adh Migr 2(1):9–1610.4161/cam.2.1.5884 ↗
23. Kumar A, Han SS (2017) PVA-based hydrogels for tissue engineering: a review. Int J Polym Mater PoN 66(4):159–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/00914037.2016.119093010.1080/00914037.2016.1190930 ↗
24. Alexy P, Káchová D, Kršiak M, Bakoš D, Šimková B (2002) Poly(Vinyl Alcohol) stabilisation in thermoplastic processing. Polym Degrad Stabil 78(3):413–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-3910(02)00177-510.1016/S0141-3910(02)00177-5 ↗
25. Gaaz T, Sulong A, Akhtar M, Kadhum A, Mohamad A, Al-Amiery A (2015) Properties and applications of polyvinyl alcohol, halloysite nanotubes and their nanocomposites. Molecules 20(12):22833–22847. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules20121988410.3390/molecules201219884 ↗
26. Sh AA, Henning S, Michler GH (2010) Polyvinyl alcohol–collagen–hydroxyapatite biocomposite nanofibrous scaffold: mimicking the key features of natural bone at the nanoscale level. Polymer 51(4):868–876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2009.12.04610.1016/j.polymer.2009.12.046 ↗
27. Teixeira, Marta A., M. Teresa P. Amorim, and Helena P. Felgueiras. 2020. “Poly (Vinyl Alcohol) -Based Nanofibrous Electrospun Sca Ff Olds for Tissue Engineering Applications.”10.3390/polym12010007 ↗
28. Sobczak-Kupiec A, Drabczyk A, Florkiewicz W, Głąb M, Kudłacik-Kramarczyk S, Słota D, Tomala A, Tyliszczak B (2021) Review of the applications of biomedical compositions containing hydroxyapatite and collagen modified by bioactive components. Mater. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1409209610.3390/ma14092096 ↗
29. Santosh Kumar BY, Isloor AM, Anil S, Venkatesan J, MohaKumar GC (2019) Calcium phosphate bioceramics with polyvinyl alcohol hydrogels for biomedical applications. Mater Res Exp. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab549f10.1088/2053-1591/ab549f ↗
30. Maheshwari S, Uma K, Govindan M, Raja A, Pravin MBS, Vasanth Kumar S (2017) Preliminary studies of PVA/PVP Blends Incorporated with HAp and β- TCP bone ceramic as template for hard tissue engineering. Bio-Med Mater Eng 28(4):401–415. https://doi.org/10.3233/BME-17168210.3233/BME-171682 ↗
31. Hou Q, Wang X, Ragauskas AJ (2019) Preparation and characterization of nanocellulose-polyvinyl alcohol multilayer film by layer-by-layer method. Cellulose 26(8):4787–4798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02413-010.1007/s10570-019-02413-0 ↗
32. Nguyen TP, Nguyen QV, Nguyen VH, Le TH, Huynh VQN, Vo DVN, Trinh QT et al (2019) Silk fibroin-based biomaterials for biomedical applications: a review. Polymers 11(12):1933. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1112193310.3390/polym11121933 ↗
33. Pillai MM, Gopinathan J, Indumathi B, Manjoosha YR, Santosh Sahanand K, Dinakar Rai BK, Selvakumar R et al (2016) Silk–PVA hybrid nanofibrous scaffolds for enhanced primary human meniscal cell proliferation. J Membrane Biol 249(6):813–822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00232-016-9932-z10.1007/s00232-016-9932-z ↗
34. Melke J, Midha S, Ghosh S, Ito K, Hofmann S (2016) Silk fibroin as biomaterial for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 31:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2015.09.00510.1016/j.actbio.2015.09.005 ↗
35. Srinivasan R, Rose GD (1999) A physical basis for protein secondary structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96(25):14258–14263. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.25.1425810.1073/pnas.96.25.14258 ↗
36. Sun W, Gregory DA, Tomeh MA, Zhao X (2021) Silk fibroin as a functional biomaterial for tissue engineering. Int J Mol Sci 22(3):1–28. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms2203149910.3390/ijms22031499 ↗
37. Kambe Y (2021) Functionalization of silk fibroin-based biomaterials for tissue engineering. Polym J. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41428-021-00536-510.1038/s41428-021-00536-5 ↗
38. Johari N, Moroni L, Samadikuchaksaraei A (2020) Tuning the conformation and mechanical properties of silk fibroin hydrogels. Eur Polymer J 134(June):109842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2020.10984210.1016/j.eurpolymj.2020.109842 ↗
39. Yao D, Liu H, Fan Y (2016) Silk scaffolds for musculoskeletal tissue engineering. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 241(3):238–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/153537021560699410.1177/1535370215606994 ↗
40. Lamlerd T, Soontornvipart K, Kesdangsakonwut S, Kanokpanont S, Damrongsakkul S (2017) In vivo bone regeneration of thai silk fibroin scaffolds with gelatin, hydroxyapatite and hyaluronic acid. Thai J Veterinary Med 47(2):165–17210.56808/2985-1130.2820 ↗
41. Li JJ, Kim K, Roohani-Esfahani SI, Guo J, Kaplan DL, Zreiqat H (2015) A biphasic scaffold based on silk and bioactive ceramic with stratified properties for osteochondral tissue regeneration. J Mater Chem B 3(26):5361–5376. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5tb00353a10.1039/c5tb00353a ↗
42. Kamalha E, Zheng YS, Zeng YC, Fredrick MN (2013) FTIR and WAXD study of regenerated silk fibroin. AMR 677:211–215. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.677.21110.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.677.211 ↗
43. Zhang H, Li L, Dai F, Zhang H, Ni B, Zhou W, Yang X, Wu Y (2012) Preparation and characterization of silk fibroin as a biomaterial with potential for drug delivery. J Transl Med 10(1):117. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-10-11710.1186/1479-5876-10-117 ↗
44. Chen FM, Liu X (2016) Advancing biomaterials of human origin for tissue engineering. Prog Polym Sci 53:86–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.02.00410.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.02.004 ↗
45. Chan BP, Leong KW (2008) Scaffolding in tissue engineering: general approaches and tissue-specific considerations. Eur Spine 17(S4):467–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0745-310.1007/s00586-008-0745-3 ↗
46. Scaffolding Strategies for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Applications. Materials 12 (11):1824. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12111824.10.3390/ma12111824 ↗
47. Faghihzadeh F, Anaya NM, Schifman LA, Oyanedel-Craver V (2016) Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy to assess molecular-level changes in microorganisms exposed to nanoparticles. Nanotechnol Environ Eng 1(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41204-016-0001-810.1007/s41204-016-0001-8 ↗
48. Hofko B, Alavi MZ, Grothe H, Jones D, Harvey J (2017) Repeatability and sensitivity of FTIR ATR spectral analysis methods for bituminous binders. Mater Struct 50(3):187. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-017-1059-x10.1617/s11527-017-1059-x ↗
49. Bai M, Qin G, Sun Z, Long G (2015) Relationship between molecular structure characteristics of feed proteins and protein in vitro digestibility and solubility. Asian Australas J Anim Sci 29(8):1159–1165. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.070110.5713/ajas.15.0701 ↗
50. Liu Q, Wang F, Gu Z, Ma Q, Hu X (2018) Exploring the structural transformation mechanism of chinese and thailand silk fibroin fibers and formic-acid fabricated silk films. IJMS 19(11):3309. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms1911330910.3390/ijms19113309 ↗
51. Tretinnikov ON, Zagorskaya SA (2012) Determination of the degree of crystallinity of poly (Vinyl Alcohol) by FTIR spectroscopy. J Appl Spectrosc 79(4):521–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10812-012-9634-y10.1007/s10812-012-9634-y ↗
52. Niu C, Li X, Wang Y, Liu X, Shi J, Wang X (2019) Design and performance of a poly (Vinyl Alcohol)/silk fibroin enzymatically crosslinked semi-interpenetrating hydrogel for a potential hydrophobic drug delivery. RSC Adv 9(70):41074–41082. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RA09344C10.1039/C9RA09344C ↗
53. Brittle S, Desai P, Ng WC, Dunbar A, Howell R, TesařV ZWB (2015) Minimising microbubble size through oscillation frequency control. Chem Eng Res Des 104:357–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2015.08.00210.1016/j.cherd.2015.08.002 ↗
54. Kantarci N, Borak F, Ulgen KO (2004) Bubble Column Reactors. Process Biochem-US 40(7):2263–2283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2004.10.00410.1016/j.procbio.2004.10.004 ↗
55. Parivatphun T, Nooklay B, Kokoo R, Meesane J, Kooptarnond K, Khangkhamano M (2019) Fabrication of bioscaffolds using bubbling technique for bone tissue engineering. MSF 962:125–128. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.962.12510.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.962.125 ↗
56. Haugh MG, Murphy CM, O’Brien FJ (2010) Novel freeze-drying methods to produce a range of collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds with tailored mean pore sizes. Tissue Eng Part C-Me 16(5):887–894. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tec.2009.042210.1089/ten.tec.2009.0422 ↗
57. Sangkert S, Meesane J, Kamonmattayakul S, Chai WL (2016) Modified silk fibroin scaffolds with collagen/decellularized pulp for bone tissue engineering in cleft palate: morphological structures and biofunctionalities. Mat Sci Eng C-Mater 58:1138–1149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.09.03110.1016/j.msec.2015.09.031 ↗
58. Bružauskaitė I, Bironaitė D, Bagdonas E, Bernotienė E (2016) Scaffolds and cells for tissue regeneration: different scaffold pore sizes—different cell effects. Cytotechnology 68(3):355–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10616-015-9895-410.1007/s10616-015-9895-4 ↗
59. Abbasi N, Hamlet S, Love RM, Nguyen NT (2020) Porous scaffolds for bone regeneration. J Sci Adv Mater Devic 5(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsamd.2020.01.00710.1016/j.jsamd.2020.01.007 ↗
60. Turnbull G, Clarke J, Picard F, Riches P, Jia L, Han F, Li B, Shu W (2018) 3D bioactive composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Bioact Mater 3(3):278–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.10.00110.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.10.001 ↗
61. Vigier S, Fülöp T (2016) Exploring the Extracellular Matrix to Create Biomaterials. In Composition and Function of the Extracellular Matrix in the Human Body; Travascio, F., Ed.; InTech, https://doi.org/10.5772/62979.10.5772/62979 ↗
62. Zhu J, Marchant RE (2011) Design properties of hydrogel tissue-engineering scaffolds. Expert Rev Med Devic 8(5):607–626. https://doi.org/10.1586/erd.11.2710.1586/erd.11.27 ↗
63. Chen M, Coasne B, Guyer R, Derome D, Carmeliet J (2018) Role of hydrogen bonding in hysteresis observed in sorption-induced swelling of soft nanoporous polymers. Nat Commun 9(3507):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05897-910.1038/s41467-018-05897-9 ↗
64. Vining KH, Mooney DJ (2017) Mechanical forces direct stem cell behaviour in development and regeneration. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 18(12):728–742. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm.2017.10810.1038/nrm.2017.108 ↗
65. Parivatphun T, Sangkert S, Meesane J, Kokoo R, Khangkhamano M (2020) Constructed microbubble porous scaffolds of polyvinyl alcohol for subchondral bone formation for osteoarthritis surgery. Biomed Mater (Bristol). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605X/ab99d510.1088/1748-605X/ab99d5 ↗
66. Beloti MM, Rosa AL (2005) Osteoblast differentiation of human bone marrow cells under continuous and discontinuous treatment with dexamethasone. Braz Dent J 16(2):156–161. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-6440200500020001310.1590/S0103-64402005000200013 ↗
67. Tonazzini I, Bystrenova E, Chelli B, Greco P, Stoliar P, Calò A, Lazar A, Borgatti F, D’Angelo P, Martini C, Biscarini F (2010) Multiscale morphology of organic semiconductor thin films controls the adhesion and viability of human neural cells. Biophys J 98(12):2804–2812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2010.03.03610.1016/j.bpj.2010.03.036 ↗
68. Xie J, Bao M, Bruekers SMC, Huck WTS (2017) Collagen gels with different fibrillar microarchitectures elicit different cellular responses. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9(23):19630–19637. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b0388310.1021/acsami.7b03883 ↗
69. Le P, Mai-Thi HN, Stoldt VR, Tran NQ, Huynh K (2021) Morphological dependent effect of cell-free formed supramolecular fibronectin on cellular activities. Biol Chem 402(2):155–165. https://doi.org/10.1515/hsz-2019-040210.1515/hsz-2019-0402 ↗
70. Dalton, Caleb J., and Christopher A. Lemmon. 2021. Fibronectin: molecular structure, fibrillar structure and mechanochemical signaling.10.20944/preprints202108.0010.v1 ↗
71. Loh QL, Choong C (2013) Three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: role of porosity and pore size. Tissue Eng Part B: Rev 19(6):485–502. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2012.043710.1089/ten.teb.2012.0437 ↗
72. Wo J, Huang SS, Dong Ying Wu, Zhu J, Li ZZ, Yuan F (2020) The Integration of pore size and porosity distribution on Ti-6A1–4V Scaffolds by 3D Printing in the modulation of Osteo-Differentation. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. https://doi.org/10.1177/228080002093465210.1177/2280800020934652 ↗
73. Ohe JY, Kim GT, Lee JW, Nawas BA, Jung J, Kwon YD (2016) Volume stability of hydroxyapatite and β-tricalcium phosphate biphasic bone graft material in maxillary sinus floor elevation: a radiographic study using 3D cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implant Res 27(3):348–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.1255110.1111/clr.12551 ↗
74. de Grado F, Gabriel LK, Idoux-Gillet Y, Wagner Q, Musset AM, Benkirane-Jessel N, Bornert F, Offner D (2018) Bone substitutes: a review of their characteristics, clinical use, and perspectives for large bone defects management. J Tissue Eng. https://doi.org/10.1177/204173141877681910.1177/2041731418776819 ↗