The relationship between the mean dopant-ion radii and conductivity of co-doped ZnO systems, Zn1−x−y M x M′ y O (M, M′ = Al, In, Ga, Y)
Source abstract
Abstract
The conductivities of the Zn1−x−y M x M′ y O (M, M′ = Al, In, Ga, Y) and Zn1−x M x O (M = Al, In, Ga) systems were measured from room temperature to 1173 K in order to elucidate a dominant parameter of the conducting mechanism. The conductivity at 873 K first increased with the dopant content. However, it showed a maximum value at a given dopant content, and then gradually decreased. For the samples with the same dopant content, their conductivity at 873 K was strongly dependent on the mean dopant-ion radii, and reached a maximum value at around 0.51 A of the mean dopant-ion radii. The results suggested that the conductivity of the system would be influenced not only by the dopant content, but also by the mean dopant-ion radii. It was found that the co-doped ZnO system of Zn0.995Al0.003In0.003O had a conductivity higher than that of the other usual mono-doped system.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: ZnO doping and properties · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. A. Kuroyanagi, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 28 (1989) 219.10.1143/JJAP.28.219 ↗
2. L. Kaplan, A. Ben-Shalom, R. L. Boxman, S. Goldsmith, U. Rosenberg and M. Nathan, Thin solid Films 253 (1994) 1.10.1016/0040-6090(94)90284-4 ↗
3. S. Y. Myong, S. J. Baik, C. H. Lee, W. Y. Cho and K. S. Lim, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 36 (1997) L1078.10.1143/JJAP.36.L1078 ↗
4. M. Higuchi, M. Sawada and Y. Kuronuma, J. Electrochem. Soc. 140 (1993) 1773.10.1149/1.2221640 ↗
5. V. Gavryushin, G. Raciukaitis, D. Juodzbalis, A. Kazlauskas and V. Kubertavicius, J. Crystal. Growth 138 (1994) 924.10.1016/0022-0248(94)90933-4 ↗
6. P. Bonasewics, W. Hirschwald and G. Neumann, Phys. Stat. Sol. (a) 97 (1986) 593.10.1002/pssa.2210970234 ↗
7. Y. Igasaki and H. Saito, Thin Solid Films 199 (1991) 223.10.1016/0040-6090(91)90004-H ↗
8. A. Sarkar, S. Ghosh, S. Chaudhuri and A. K. Pal, ibid. 204 (1991) 255.10.1016/0040-6090(91)90067-8 ↗
9. T. Minami, H. Nanto and S. Tanaka, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 23 (1984) L280.10.1143/JJAP.23.L280 ↗
10. T. Minami, S. Tanaka and T. Kakumu, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 14 (1996) 1689.10.1116/1.580320 ↗
11. K. Kakinuma and K. Fueki, Phys. Rev. B 56 (1997) 3494.10.1103/PhysRevB.56.3494 ↗
12. B. H. Choi, H. B. Im, J. S. Song and K. H. Yoon, Thin Solid Films 193/194 (1990) 712.10.1016/0040-6090(90)90223-Z ↗
13. T. Minami, T. Kakumu, K. Shimokawa and S. Tanaka, ibid. 317 (1998) 318.10.1016/S0040-6090(97)00547-6 ↗
14. J. R. Bellingham, W. A. Phillips and C. J. Adkins, J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 11 (1992) 263.10.1007/BF00729407 ↗
15. R. D. Shannon, Acta. Cryst. A 32 (1976) 751.10.1107/S0567739476001551 ↗
16. G. Zwicker and K. Jacobi, Solid State Commun. 54 (1985) 701.10.1016/0038-1098(85)90591-5 ↗
17. H. Kamata, Y. Yonemura, J. Mizusaki, H. Tagawa, K. Naraya and T. Sasamoto, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 56 (1995) 943.10.1016/0022-3697(95)00019-4 ↗
18. J. Mizusaki, J. Tabuchi, T. Matsuura, S. Yamauchi and K. Fueki, J. Electrochem. Soc. 136 (1989) 2082.10.1149/1.2097187 ↗