Ultrasonic sound speed analysis of hydrating calcium sulphate hemihydrate
Source abstract
Abstract
This article focuses on the hydration, and associated microstructure development, of β-hemihydrate to dihydrate (gypsum). The sound velocity is used to quantify the composition of the fresh slurry as well as the hardening and hardened-porous-material. Furthermore, an overview of available hydration kinetic and volumetric models for gypsum is addressed. The presented models predict the sound velocity through slurries and hardened products. These states correspond to the starting and ending times of the hydration process. The present research shows that a linear relation between the amount of hydration-product (gypsum) formed and sound velocity (Smith et al., J Eur Ceram Soc 22(12):1947, 2002) can be used to describe this process. To this end, the amount of hydration-product formed is determined using the equations of Schiller (J Appl Chem Biotechnol 24(7):379, 1974) for the hydration process and of Brouwers (A hydration model of Portland cement using the work of Powers and Brownyard, 2011) for the volume fractions of binder, water and hydration products during the hydration process.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Grouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics · Drilling and Well Engineering · Concrete and Cement Materials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Robeyst N, Gruyaert E, Grosse CU, De Belie ND (2008) Cem Concr Res 38(10):116910.1016/j.cemconres.2008.04.006 ↗
2. Reinhardt HW, Grosse CU (2004) Constr Build Mater 18(3):14510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2003.10.002 ↗
3. De Belie ND, Grosse CU, Kurz J, Reinhardt HW (2005) Cem Concr Res 35(11):208710.1016/j.cemconres.2005.03.011 ↗
4. Ylmén R, Jäglid U, Steenari B-M, Panas I (2009) Cem Concr Res 39(5):43310.1016/j.cemconres.2009.01.017 ↗
5. Reinhardt HW, Grosse CU, Herb A, Weiler B, Schmidt G. Verfahren zur Untersuchung eines erstarrenden und/oder erhärtenden Werkstoffs mittels Ultraschall, U.S. Patent 198 56 259.41999
6. Schiller K (1974) J Appl Chem Biotechnol 24(7):37910.1002/jctb.5020240702 ↗
7. Sayers CM, Dahlin A (1993) Adv Cem Based Mater 1(1):1210.1016/1065-7355(93)90004-8 ↗
8. Robeyst N, Grosse CU, De Belie N (2009) Cem Concr Res 39(10):86810.1016/j.cemconres.2009.06.016 ↗
9. Losso M, Viveiros E (2005) Sound insulation of gypsum board in practice. Presented at the 2005 Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2005
10. Harker AH, Temple JAG (1988) J Phys D 21(11):157610.1088/0022-3727/21/11/006 ↗
11. Austin JC, Holmes AK, Tebbutt JS, Challis RE (1996) Ultrasonics 34(2–5):36910.1016/0041-624X(95)00113-H ↗
12. Gómez Álvarez-Arenas TE, Elvira Segura L, Riera Franco de Sarabia E (2002) Ultrasonics 39(10):71510.1016/S0041-624X(02)00375-X ↗
13. Hoyos M, Bacri JC, Martin J, Salin D (1994) Phys Fluids 6(12):380910.1063/1.868372 ↗
14. Landau L (1986) Theory of elasticity, 3rd edn. Pergamon Press, Oxford
15. Arnold M, Boccaccini AR, Ondracek G (1996) J Mater Sci 31(6):1643. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0035787610.1007/BF00357876 ↗
16. Roth DJ, Stang DB, Swickard SM, DeGuire MR (1990) Review and statistical analysis of the ultrasonic velocity method for estimating the porosity fraction in polycrystalline materials. NASA, Cleveland, OH
17. Dalui SK, Roychowdhury M, Phani KK (1996) J Mater Sci 31(5):1261. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0035310510.1007/BF00353105 ↗
18. Ye G (2003) Experimental study and numerical simulation of the development of the microstructure and permeability of cementious materials. PhD-Thesis, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands
19. Brouwers HJH (2011) A hydration model of Portland cement using the work of Powers and Brownyard. Portland Cement Association, Skokie, IL
20. Schiller KK (1958) In: Walton WH (ed) Mechanical properties of non-brittle materials. Butterworths Sci Pub, London, pp 35–49
21. Phani KK, Niyogi SK, Maitra AK, Roychaudhury M (1986) J Mater Sci 21(12):4335. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0110655210.1007/BF01106552 ↗
22. Yu QL, Brouwers HJH (2011) Constr Build Mater 25(7):314910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.12.005 ↗
23. Smith A, Chotard T, Gimet-Breart N, Fargeot D (2002) J Eur Ceram Soc 22(12):194710.1016/S0955-2219(01)00530-1 ↗
24. Schiller K (1962) J Appl Chem 12(3):13510.1002/jctb.5010120310 ↗
25. Schiller K (1963) J Appl Chem 13(12):57210.1002/jctb.5010131208 ↗
26. Schiller K (1965) Nature 205:120810.1038/2051208b0 ↗
27. Ridge MJ, Surkevicius H (1961) J Appl Chem 11(11):42010.1002/jctb.5010111103 ↗
28. Ridge MJ, Surkevicius H (1962) J Appl Chem 12(6):24610.1002/jctb.5010120602 ↗
29. Ridge MJ, Surkevicius H (1966) J Appl Chem 16(3):7810.1002/jctb.5010160302 ↗
30. Beretka J, van der Touw JW (1989) J Chem Technol Biotechnol 44(1):1910.1002/jctb.280440104 ↗
31. Fujii K, Kondo W (1986) J Chem Soc Dalton Trans 4:72910.1039/dt9860000729 ↗
32. Singh NB, Middendorf B (2007) Prog Cryst Growth Charact Mater 53(1):5710.1016/j.pcrysgrow.2007.01.002 ↗
33. Hunger M, Brouwers HJH (2009) Cem Concr Compos 31(1):3910.1016/j.cemconcomp.2008.09.010 ↗
34. Hunger M (2010) An integral design concept for ecological self-compacting concrete. PhD Thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
35. Grosse U, Lehmann F (2008) Ultrasound measurements of the hydration rate of hemihydrates. Materialprufungsanstalt, Universitat Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
36. Lide DR (2003) CRC handbook of chemistry and physics, 84th edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
37. Schofield PF, Stretton IC, Knight KS, Hull S (1997) Physica B 234–236:94210.1016/S0921-4526(96)01219-7 ↗
38. Meille S, Garboczi EJ (2001) Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 9(5):37110.1088/0965-0393/9/5/303 ↗
39. Haecker CJ et al (2005) Cem Concr Res 35(10):194810.1016/j.cemconres.2005.05.001 ↗