Surface modifications to improve Ti–porcelain bonding
Source abstract
Abstract
Investigations of surface modifications on cast titanium surfaces and titanium-ceramic adhesion were performed. Cast pure titanium was subjected to surface modification by preoxidation and introduction of an intermediate layer of SnOx by sol–gel process. Surfaces only sandblasted with alumina were used as controls. Specimen surfaces were characterized by XRD and SEM/EDS. The adhesion between the titanium and porcelain was evaluated by three-point flexure bond test. Failure of the titanium–porcelain with preoxidation treatment predominantly occurred at the titanium-oxide interface. Preoxidation treatment did not affect the fracture mode of the titanium–ceramic system and did not increase the bonding strength of Ti–porcelain. However, a thin and coherent SnOx film with small spherical pores obtained at 300 °C served as an effective oxygen diffusion barrier and improved titanium–ceramic adhesion. The SnOx film changed the fracture mode of the titanium–ceramic system and improved the mechanical and chemical bonding between porcelain and titanium, resulting in the increased bonding strength of titanium–porcelain.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Zavanelli RA, Henriques GEP, Ferreira I et al (2000) J Prosthet Dent 84:27410.1067/mpr.2000.108758 ↗
2. Wang RR, Fenton A (1996) Quintess Int 27:401
3. Milella E, Cosentino F, Licciulli A et al (2001) Biomaterials 22:142510.1016/S0142-9612(00)00300-8 ↗
4. Hautaniemi JA, Heinonen M, Juhanoja J (1996) Surf Intersurf Anal 24:76310.1002/(SICI)1096-9918(199610)24:11<763::AID-SIA178>3.0.CO;2-E ↗
5. Wang RR, Welsch G, Monteiro O (1999) J Biomed Mater Res 46(2):26210.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199908)46:2<262::AID-JBM16>3.0.CO;2-1 ↗
6. Adachi M, Mackert JJ, Parry EE et al (1990) J Dent Res 69:123010.1177/00220345900690060101 ↗
7. Hautaniemi JA, Juhanoja JT, HerØ H (1993) Surf Intersurf Anal 20:42110.1002/sia.740200515 ↗
8. Chung KH, Duh JG, Shin D et al (2002) J Biomed Mater Res B 63:51610.1002/jbm.10307 ↗
9. Lee KM, Cai Z, Griggs JA et al (2004) J Biomed Mater Res B 68:16510.1002/jbm.b.20017 ↗
10. Zhang H, Guo TW, Song ZX et al (2007) Surf Coat Technol 201:563710.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.07.023 ↗
11. Wang RR, Meyers E, Katz JL (1998) J Biomed Mater Res 42:50810.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19981215)42:4<508::AID-JBM5>3.0.CO;2-V ↗
12. Özcan I, Uysal H (2005) Dent Mater 21:77310.1016/j.dental.2005.01.014 ↗
13. Yoshida K, Kamada K, Sato K et al (1999) J Biomed Mater Res 48:77810.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(1999)48:6<778::AID-JBM3>3.0.CO;2-C ↗
14. Könönen M, Kivilahti J (1994) J Biomed Mater Res 28:102710.1002/jbm.820280907 ↗
15. ISO 9693 (1999) International Organization for Standardization, Geneva
16. Adachi M, Mackert JR, Parry EE et al (1990) J Dent Res 69(6):123010.1177/00220345900690060101 ↗
17. Krishna DSR, Brama YL, Sun Y (2007) Tribol Int 40:32910.1016/j.triboint.2005.08.004 ↗
18. Tróia MG Jr, Henriques GEP et al (2003) Dent Mater 19:79010.1016/S0109-5641(03)00027-7 ↗
19. Fischer J (2002) Biomaterials 23:130310.1016/S0142-9612(01)00248-4 ↗