Influence of crystallization time on microstructures and dielectric properties of tungsten–bronze glass–ceramics
Source abstract
Abstract
A glass with a composition of 22.5SrO–22.5BaO–15Nb2O5–40SiO2 (mol %) was prepared by a melt-quenching method and then heat-treated at 950 °C for different crystallization time. Microstructure observations were carried out using scanning electron microscope and dielectric properties were measured by a LCR meter. The experimental results show that volume fraction of the crystalline phase increased, dielectric constant maximum enhanced, and Curie temperature shifted as the crystallization time is prolonged. The decrease in the Curie temperature for the sample crystallized at 950 °C for 1 h is considered to be caused by the clamping effect from the glass matrix or small compositional fluctuation. Impedance spectroscopy has been employed to study the polarization contributions arising from the glass and crystalline phases in the glass–ceramics for different crystallization time. With the increase in crystallization time, the magnitudes of impedance and modulus as well as the relaxation frequency changed significantly. The activation energy calculated from the relaxation frequency increased for the glass phase due to a denser network structure, while the crystalline phase showed a slight decrease implying there is no change in its polarization mechanism.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Glass properties and applications · Microwave Dielectric Ceramics Synthesis · Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Pan MJ, Randall CA (2010) IEEE Electr Insul Mag 26(3):4410.1109/MEI.2010.5482787 ↗
2. Cheng CT, Lanagan M, Jones B, Lin JT, Pan MJ (2005) J Am Ceram Soc 88(11):303710.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00551.x ↗
3. Gorzkowski EP, Pan MJ, Bender B, Wu CCM (2007) J Electroceram 18:26910.1007/s10832-007-9127-1 ↗
4. Gorzkowski EP, Pan MJ, Bender BA, Wu CCM (2008) J Am Ceram Soc 91(4):106510.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.02254.x ↗
5. Herczog A (1964) J Am Ceram Soc 47:10710.1111/j.1151-2916.1964.tb14366.x ↗
6. Yao K, Zhang LY, Yao X (1997) J Mater Sci 32:3659. doi: 10.1023/A:101863863177710.1023/A:1018638631777 ↗
7. Chen JC, Zhang Y, Deng CS, Dai XM (2009) J Am Ceram Soc 92(6):135010.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03028.x ↗
8. Shyu JJ, Chen CH (2003) Ceram Int 29:44710.1016/S0272-8842(02)00186-4 ↗
9. Shyu JJ, Wang JR (2003) J Am Ceram Soc 83(12):313510.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01694.x ↗
10. Zeng YK, Qin XY, Jiang SL, Zhang GZ, Zhang L (2011) J Am Ceram Soc 94(2):46910.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.04223.x ↗
11. Trubelja MP, Ryba E, Smith DK (1996) J Mater Sci 31:1435. doi: 10.1007/BF0035785010.1007/BF00357850 ↗
12. Fang TT, Wu NT (1995) J Mater Sci 30:3376. doi: 10.1007/BF0034988210.1007/BF00349882 ↗
13. Thakur OP, Kumar D, Parkash O, Pandey L (2003) J Mater Chem Phys 78:75110.1016/S0254-0584(02)00413-3 ↗
14. Graça MPF, Valente MA (2006) J Mater Sci 41:1137. doi: 10.1007/s10853-005-3652-610.1007/s10853-005-3652-6 ↗
15. Rangarajan B, Bharadwaja SSN, Furman E, Shrout T, Lanagan M (2010) J Am Ceram Soc 93(2):52210.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03423.x ↗
16. Diao Y, Myerson AS, Hatton TA, Trout BL (2011) Langmuir 27:532410.1021/la104351k ↗
17. Deshpande SB, Potdar HS, Godbole PD, Date SK (1992) J Am Ceram Soc 75(9):258110.1111/j.1151-2916.1992.tb05615.x ↗
18. Divya PV, Kumar V (2007) J Am Ceram Soc 90(2):47210.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01452.x ↗
19. Anantha PS, Hariharan K (2005) Mat Sci Eng B 121:1210.1016/j.mseb.2004.12.005 ↗
20. Tsang TF, Fung YC (2006) J Appl Phys 100:01411010.1063/1.2213168 ↗
21. Elissalde C, Ravez J (2001) J Mat Chem 11:195710.1039/b010117f ↗