Wetting and mechanical properties, a case study: Liquid metal embrittlement of a martensitic steel by liquid lead and other liquid metals
Source abstract
Abstract
We present experimental results of tensile and fatigue properties of the T91 (a 9% Cr martensitic steel) in a stagnant molten metallic bath (Pb, Pb-Bi or Sn for instance). Under particular experimental conditions, the tensile tests revealed an instantaneous embrittlement of the material, more pronounced at low temperature, that disappears as the temperature is raised above 450°C. This behavior is explained by the reduction of the surface energy of the bare metal induced by the adsorption of the liquid metal. When the steel is submitted to low cycle fatigue tests in presence of the liquid Pb-Bi eutectic at 300°C, its lifetime is significantly reduced compared to tests performed in air. In this case, given the complexity of the mechanisms leading to a fatigue fracture, it is more difficult to ascribe the observed embrittlement to the sole surface-energy reduction effect, but and adsorption-induced localization of the plastic deformation at the very crack tip is an appealing hypothesis.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics · Nuclear Materials and Properties · Thermodynamic and Structural Properties of Metals and Alloys
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. E. D. SHCHUKIN, Colloids Surf. A 149 (1999) 529.10.1016/S0927-7757(98)00607-4 ↗
2. A. LEGRIS, G. NICAISE, J. B. VOGT, J. FOCT, D. GORSE and D. VANÇon, Scripta Mater. 43 (2000) 997.10.1016/S1359-6462(00)00523-6 ↗
3. G. NICAISE, A. LEGRIS, J. B. VOGT and J. FOCT, J. Nucl. Mater. 296 (2001) 256.10.1016/S0022-3115(01)00525-6 ↗
4. A. LEGRIS, G. NICAISE, J.-B. VOGT and J. FOCT, ibid. 301 (2002) 70.10.1016/S0022-3115(01)00730-9 ↗
5. J. B VOGT, G. NICAISE, A. LEGRIS and F. FOCT, J. de Physique 12(Pr8) (2002) 217.
6. J.-B. VOGT, A. VERLEENE, I. SERRE and A. LEGRIS, J. Nucl. Mater. 335 (2004) 222.10.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.07.024 ↗
7. A. E. CARLSSON and R. THOMSON, Solid State Phys. 51 (1998) 233.10.1016/S0081-1947(08)60192-7 ↗
8. A. NAGESHA, M. VALSAN, R. KANNAN, K. BHANU SANKARA RAO and S. L. MANNAN, Int. J. Fatigue 24 (2002) 1285.10.1016/S0142-1123(02)00035-X ↗
9. T. MAGNIN, D. DESJARDINS and M. PUIGGALI, Corros. Sci. 29 (1989) 567.10.1016/0010-938X(89)90008-5 ↗
10. D. KALKHOF and M. GROSSE, J. Nucl. Mater. 318 (2003) 143.10.1016/S0022-3115(03)00015-1 ↗
11. J. RICE and R. THOMSON, Philos. Mag. 29 (1974) 73.10.1080/14786437408213555 ↗
12. P. GUMBSCH, J. Mater. Res. 10 (1995) 2897.10.1557/JMR.1995.2897 ↗
13. J. SCHIOTZ, L. M. CANEL and A. E. CARLSSON, Phys. Rev. B 55 (1997) 6211.10.1103/PhysRevB.55.6211 ↗
14. S. G. ROBERTS, M. ELLIS and P. B. HIRSCH, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 164 (1993) 135.10.1016/0921-5093(93)90650-4 ↗
15. S. G. ROBERTS, A. S. BOOTH and P. B. HIRSCH, ibid. 176 (1994) 91.10.1016/0921-5093(94)90962-8 ↗
16. J. R. RICE, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 40 (1992) 239.10.1016/S0022-5096(05)80012-2 ↗
17. S. J. ZHOU, A. E. CARLSSON and R. THOMSON, Phys. Rev. B 47 (1993) 7710.10.1103/PhysRevB.47.7710 ↗
18. Idem., Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 (1994) 852.10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.852 ↗