Influence of heat distribution and zone shape in the floating zone growth of selected oxide compounds
Source abstract
Abstract
The effects of heat distribution, process parameters, and the ambient atmosphere on the characteristics of the molten zone are considered for floating zone (FZ) crystal growth of selected oxide compounds with special reference to cuprates. The outer shape of the FZ, which is stabilized only by capillary forces, and the interfaces between melt and growing crystal are decisive for process stability and crystal perfection. They do not only depend on external parameters such as zone heights, growth velocity, and rotation mode but are closely related to the phase diagram and the constitution of the individual substance. Therefore, the choice of the optimum process conditions is a subtle balance of parameters like appropriate focusing or defocusing of the light, the direction of growth and the ambient atmosphere, which are adapted to the individual substance. A pyrometric method of FZ temperature measurement was developed as an appropriate tool for process control.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Solidification and crystal growth phenomena · Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism · Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (15)
Show source-provided references
1. Lüdge A, Riemann H, Wuenscher M, Behr G, Löser W, Muiznieks A, Croell A (2009) In: Duffar T (ed) Crystal growth processes based on capillarity: Czochralski, floating zone, shaping and crucible techniques, chap 4. Wiley, Chichester, England (in print)10.1002/9781444320237.ch4 ↗
2. Balbashov AM, Egorov SK (1981) J Cryst Growth 52:49810.1016/0022-0248(81)90328-6 ↗
3. Souptel D, Löser W, Behr G (2007) J Cryst Growth 300:53810.1016/j.jcrysgro.2006.12.042 ↗
4. Koohpayeh SM, Fort D, Abell JS (2008) Prog Cryst Growth Character Mater 54:12110.1016/j.pcrysgrow.2008.06.001 ↗
5. Bednorz JG, Müller KA (1986) Z Physik 64:18910.1007/BF01303701 ↗
6. Wu MK, Ashburn JR, Torng CJ, Hor PH, Meng RL, Gao L, Huang ZJ, Wang YQ, Chu CW (1987) Phys Rev Lett 58:90810.1103/PhysRevLett.58.908 ↗
7. Cava RJ (1990) Science 247:65610.1126/science.247.4943.656 ↗
8. Tranquada JM, Sternlieb BJ, Axe JD, Nakamura Y, Uchida S (1995) Nature 375:56110.1038/375561a0 ↗
9. Wizent N, Behr G, Lipps F, Hellmann I, Klingeler R, Kataev V, Löser W, Sato N, Büchner B (2009) J Cryst Growth 311:127310.1016/j.jcrysgro.2009.01.090 ↗
10. Behr G, Löser W, Souptel D, Fuchs G, Mazilu I, Cao C, Köhler A, Schultz L, Büchner B (2008) J Cryst Growth 310:226810.1016/j.jcrysgro.2007.11.227 ↗
11. Behr G, Voigtländer R, Horst A, Morgner R, Fischer F, Patent DE 10 2006 019 807.7 (21 April 2006) and PCT/EP2007/05157 (7 March 2007)
12. Vanek P, Kadeckova S, Jurisch M, Löser W (1983) J Cryst Growth 63:19110.1016/0022-0248(83)90446-3 ↗
13. Louchev OA, Otani S, Ishizawa Y (1996) J Appl Phys 80:51810.1063/1.362780 ↗
14. Schramm L, Behr G, Löser W, Wetzig K (2005) J Phase Equilib Diffus 26:60510.1007/s11669-005-0005-8 ↗
15. Behr G, Löser W, Apostu M-O, Gruner W, Hücker M, Schramm L, Souptel D, Teresiak A, Werner J (2005) Cryst Res Technol 40:2110.1002/crat.200410303 ↗