Nonlinear electrical characteristics and dielectric properties of (Ca, Ta)-doped TiO2 ceramics
Source abstract
Abstract
TiO2 ceramics doped with 1.0 mol% Ca and different concentrations of Ta were obtained by sintering processing at 1450°C. The microstructures, nonlinear electrical behavior and dielectric properties of the ceramics were investigated. The samples have nonlinear coefficients of α = 2.0–5.0 and ultrahigh relative dielectric constants which is up to 105. Especially, the effects of Ta dopant on the nonlinear electrical characteristics and dielectric properties of the (Ca, Ta)-doped TiO2 ceramics were studied in detail. When the concentration of Ta is 2.0 mol%, the sample exhibits the highest nonlinear coefficient and a comparatively lower dielectric constant. By analogy to a grain-boundary atomic defect model, the effects of Ta and the nonlinear electrical behavior of the TiO2 system were explained.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: ZnO doping and properties · Perovskite Materials and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. H. F. Dienel, Bell Labs. Record 32 (1954) 336.
2. L. M. Levinson and H. R. Philipp, Amer. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 65 (1986) 639.
3. T. K. Gupta, J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 73 (1990) 1817.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb05232.x ↗
4. N. Yamaoka, M. Masuyama and M. Fukui, Amer. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 62 (1983) 698.
5. H. C. Ling, M. F. Yan and W. W. Rhodes, J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 72 (1989) 1274.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1989.tb09726.x ↗
6. Y. J. Wang, J. F. Wang, H. C. Chen, W. L. Zhong, P. L. Zhang, H. M. Dong and L. Y. Zhao, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 33 (2000) 96.10.1088/0022-3727/33/1/313 ↗
7. J. M. Wu and C. J. Chen, J. Mater. Sci. 23 (1988) 4157.10.1007/BF01106851 ↗
8. C. J. Chen and J. M. Wu, ibid. 24 (1989) 2871.10.1007/BF02385640 ↗
9. J. M. Wu and H. M. Sung, Mater. Sci. Eng. B 3 (1989) 265.10.1016/0921-5107(89)90020-2 ↗
10. J. Pennewiss and B. Hoffmann, Mater. Lett. 9 (1990) 219.10.1016/0167-577X(90)90134-8 ↗
11. J. M. Wu and C. H. Lai, J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 74 (1991) 3112.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb04308.x ↗
12. J. J. Cheng and J. M. Wu, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 35 (1996) 4704.10.1143/JJAP.35.4704 ↗
13. P. R. Bueno, E. Camargo, E. Longo, E. R. Leite, S. A. Pianaro and J. A. Varela, J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 15 (1996) 2048.10.1007/BF00278618 ↗
14. J. F. Wang, H. C. Chen, X. H. Zhang, D. J. Zhang and W. L. Zhong, Chin. Phys. Lett. 17 (2000) 530.10.1088/0256-307X/17/7/024 ↗
15. C. P. Li, J. F. Wang, Y. J. Wang, W. B. Su, H. C. Chen and D. X. Zhuang, ibid. 18 (2001) 674.10.1088/0256-307X/18/5/317 ↗
16. M. F. Yan and W. W. Rhodes, Appl. Phys. Lett. 40 (1982) 536.10.1063/1.93134 ↗
17. E. R. Leite, J. A. Varela and E. Longo, J. Mater. Sci. 27 (1992) 5325.10.1007/BF02403838 ↗
18. S. A. Pianaro, P. R. Bueno, P. Olivi, E. Longo and J. A. Varela, J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 16 (1997) 634.10.1023/A:1018515232646 ↗
19. Y. J. Wang, J. F. Wang, C. P. Li, C. Chen, W. B. Su, W. L. Zhong, P. L. Zhang and L. Y. Zhao, ibid. 20 (2001) 19.10.1023/A:1006742110639 ↗
20. T. K. Gupta and W. G. Carlson, J. Mater. Sci. 20 (1985) 3487.10.1007/BF01113755 ↗