High-temperature resistivity of aluminum–carbon nanotube composites
Source abstract
Abstract
The resistivity and thermal coefficient of resistivity (TCR), of metallic matrix composites, MMCs, aluminum–carbon nanotube, Al-CNT, were studied under high vacuum in the temperature interval from RT to 800 K. The samples shaped as small cylinders and containing single-walled CNTs or multi-walled CNTs were sintered at 625 °C. The resistivity of sintered samples of pure Al was found three orders of magnitude higher with respect to bulk, having the former a density value equal to 98.8 % of bulk Al. The explored range of the CNT concentration was within 5 wt%. At the highest CNT concentrations, the trend of resistivity against temperature was found negative being more pronounced for composites with MWCNTs. For Al-SWCNT composites, at around 3.3 wt% (4.2 vol%), TCR is practically independent from temperature; for Al-MWCNT, the TCR zero-crossing occurs at different compositions depending on temperature. Higher is the temperature, lower is the TCR zero-crossing composition. Resistivity data were discussed in the framework of the Matthiessen’s rule and sound evidences were shown that no Al4C3 formation was detected at working temperatures.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Electromagnetic wave absorption materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Sahoo NG, Li L (2013) Carbon nanotube-reinforced polymer composites for aerospace application. In: Zhang S, Zhao D (eds) Aerospace Materials Handbook. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 493–552
2. Unterweger C, Brueggemann O, Fuerst C (2014) Synthetic fibers and thermoplastic short-fiber-reinforced polymers: properties and characterization. Polym Compos 35:227–23610.1002/pc.22654 ↗
3. Zare Y, Garmabi H (2014) Attempts to simulate the modulus of polymer/carbon nanotube nanocomposites and future trends. Polym Rev 54:377–40010.1080/15583724.2013.870574 ↗
4. Wang W, Liao S, Liu M, Zhao Q, Zhu Y (2014) Polymer composites reinforced by nanotubes as scaffolds for tissue engineering, Int J Polym Sci 805634/1-805634/1410.1155/2014/805634 ↗
5. Bai Q, Mei H, Ji T, Sun Y, Li H, Cheng L (2014) Mechanical properties of carbon nanotube reinforced composites: a review. Ceram Trans 248:167–17810.1002/9781118932995.ch17 ↗
6. Casati R, Vedani M (2014) Metal matrix composites reinforced by nano-particles—a review. Metals 4:65–8310.3390/met4010065 ↗
7. Silvestre N (2013) State-of-the-art review on carbon nanotube reinforced metal matrix composites. Int J Compos Mater 3:28–44
8. Bakshi SR, Lahiri D, Agarwal A (2010) Carbon nanotube reinforced metal matrix composites – a review. Int Mater Rev 55:41–6410.1179/095066009X12572530170543 ↗
9. Gozzi D, Latini A, Lazzarini L (2009) Experimental thermodynamics of high temperature transformations in single-walled carbon nanotube bundles. J Am Chem Soc 131:12474–1248210.1021/ja904294z ↗
10. Gozzi D, Latini A, Lazzarini L (2008) Chemical differentiation of carbon nanotubes in a carbonaceous matrix. Chem Mater 20:4126–413410.1021/cm800484j ↗
11. Zhang L, Hashimoto Y, Taishi T, Qing-Qing Ni Q-Q (2011) Mild hydrothermal treatment to prepare highly dispersed multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Appl Surf Sci 257:1845–184910.1016/j.apsusc.2010.08.106 ↗
12. Latini A, Tomellini M, Lazzarini L, Bertoni G, Gazzoli D et al (2014) High temperature stability of onion-like carbon vs highly oriented pyrolytic graphite. PLoS One 9:e105788–e10580210.1371/journal.pone.0105788 ↗
13. Desai PD, James HM, Ho CY (1984) Electrical resistivity of aluminum and manganese. J Phys Chem Ref Data 13:1131–117210.1063/1.555725 ↗
14. Latini A, Gozzi D, Ferraris G, Lazzarini L (2011) High-temperature resistivity of dense mats of single-walled carbon nanotube bundles. J Phys Chem C 115:11023–1102910.1021/jp203149v ↗
15. Ci L, Ryu Z, Jin-Phillipp NY, Rühle M (2006) Investigation of the interfacial reaction between multi-walled carbon nanotubes and aluminum. Acta Mater 54:5367–537510.1016/j.actamat.2006.06.031 ↗
16. Landry K, Kalogeropoulou S, Eustathopoulos N (1998) Wettability of carbon by aluminum and aluminum alloys. Mater Sci Eng A A254:99–11110.1016/S0921-5093(98)00759-X ↗
17. Tham LM, Gupta M, Cheng L (2001) Effect of limited matrix–reinforcement interfacial reaction on enhancing the mechanical properties of aluminium–silicon carbide composites. Acta Mater 49:3243–325310.1016/S1359-6454(01)00221-X ↗
18. King WR, Dorward RC (1985) Electrical resistivity of aluminum carbide at 990-1240 K. J Electrochem Soc 132:388–38910.1149/1.2113847 ↗
19. International Center for Diffraction Data, data base JCPDS CARD = 79-1736
20. IVTANTHERMO for Windows, v.3.0 (2005) Database of thermodynamic properties of individual substances and thermodynamic modeling software. Glushko Thermocenter of RAS