journal article·2015-11

High-temperature resistivity of aluminum–carbon nanotube composites

V. Genova, D. Gozzi, A. Latini

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 50· Issue 21
Publisher page

Abstract

The resistivity and thermal coefficient of resistivity (TCR), of metallic matrix composites, MMCs, aluminum–carbon nanotube, Al-CNT, were studied under high vacuum in the temperature interval from RT to 800 K. The samples shaped as small cylinders and containing single-walled CNTs or multi-walled CNTs were sintered at 625 °C. The resistivity of sintered samples of pure Al was found three orders of magnitude higher with respect to bulk, having the former a density value equal to 98.8 % of bulk Al. The explored range of the CNT concentration was within 5 wt%. At the highest CNT concentrations, the trend of resistivity against temperature was found negative being more pronounced for composites with MWCNTs. For Al-SWCNT composites, at around 3.3 wt% (4.2 vol%), TCR is practically independent from temperature; for Al-MWCNT, the TCR zero-crossing occurs at different compositions depending on temperature. Higher is the temperature, lower is the TCR zero-crossing composition. Resistivity data were discussed in the framework of the Matthiessen’s rule and sound evidences were shown that no Al4C3 formation was detected at working temperatures.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Electromagnetic wave absorption materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Sahoo NG, Li L (2013) Carbon nanotube-reinforced polymer composites for aerospace application. In: Zhang S, Zhao D (eds) Aerospace Materials Handbook. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 493–552
2. Unterweger C, Brueggemann O, Fuerst C (2014) Synthetic fibers and thermoplastic short-fiber-reinforced polymers: properties and characterization. Polym Compos 35:227–23610.1002/pc.22654 ↗
3. Zare Y, Garmabi H (2014) Attempts to simulate the modulus of polymer/carbon nanotube nanocomposites and future trends. Polym Rev 54:377–40010.1080/15583724.2013.870574 ↗
4. Wang W, Liao S, Liu M, Zhao Q, Zhu Y (2014) Polymer composites reinforced by nanotubes as scaffolds for tissue engineering, Int J Polym Sci 805634/1-805634/1410.1155/2014/805634 ↗
5. Bai Q, Mei H, Ji T, Sun Y, Li H, Cheng L (2014) Mechanical properties of carbon nanotube reinforced composites: a review. Ceram Trans 248:167–17810.1002/9781118932995.ch17 ↗
6. Casati R, Vedani M (2014) Metal matrix composites reinforced by nano-particles—a review. Metals 4:65–8310.3390/met4010065 ↗
7. Silvestre N (2013) State-of-the-art review on carbon nanotube reinforced metal matrix composites. Int J Compos Mater 3:28–44
8. Bakshi SR, Lahiri D, Agarwal A (2010) Carbon nanotube reinforced metal matrix composites – a review. Int Mater Rev 55:41–6410.1179/095066009X12572530170543 ↗
9. Gozzi D, Latini A, Lazzarini L (2009) Experimental thermodynamics of high temperature transformations in single-walled carbon nanotube bundles. J Am Chem Soc 131:12474–1248210.1021/ja904294z ↗
10. Gozzi D, Latini A, Lazzarini L (2008) Chemical differentiation of carbon nanotubes in a carbonaceous matrix. Chem Mater 20:4126–413410.1021/cm800484j ↗
11. Zhang L, Hashimoto Y, Taishi T, Qing-Qing Ni Q-Q (2011) Mild hydrothermal treatment to prepare highly dispersed multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Appl Surf Sci 257:1845–184910.1016/j.apsusc.2010.08.106 ↗
12. Latini A, Tomellini M, Lazzarini L, Bertoni G, Gazzoli D et al (2014) High temperature stability of onion-like carbon vs highly oriented pyrolytic graphite. PLoS One 9:e105788–e10580210.1371/journal.pone.0105788 ↗
13. Desai PD, James HM, Ho CY (1984) Electrical resistivity of aluminum and manganese. J Phys Chem Ref Data 13:1131–117210.1063/1.555725 ↗
14. Latini A, Gozzi D, Ferraris G, Lazzarini L (2011) High-temperature resistivity of dense mats of single-walled carbon nanotube bundles. J Phys Chem C 115:11023–1102910.1021/jp203149v ↗
15. Ci L, Ryu Z, Jin-Phillipp NY, Rühle M (2006) Investigation of the interfacial reaction between multi-walled carbon nanotubes and aluminum. Acta Mater 54:5367–537510.1016/j.actamat.2006.06.031 ↗
16. Landry K, Kalogeropoulou S, Eustathopoulos N (1998) Wettability of carbon by aluminum and aluminum alloys. Mater Sci Eng A A254:99–11110.1016/S0921-5093(98)00759-X ↗
17. Tham LM, Gupta M, Cheng L (2001) Effect of limited matrix–reinforcement interfacial reaction on enhancing the mechanical properties of aluminium–silicon carbide composites. Acta Mater 49:3243–325310.1016/S1359-6454(01)00221-X ↗
18. King WR, Dorward RC (1985) Electrical resistivity of aluminum carbide at 990-1240 K. J Electrochem Soc 132:388–38910.1149/1.2113847 ↗
19. International Center for Diffraction Data, data base JCPDS CARD = 79-1736
20. IVTANTHERMO for Windows, v.3.0 (2005) Database of thermodynamic properties of individual substances and thermodynamic modeling software. Glushko Thermocenter of RAS