Effect of non-alignment on nearfield coupling, charge density and sensitivity to the host medium of a gold nanorod homodimer
Source abstract
Abstract
The impact of non-alignment on the plasmonic coupling parameters (resonance wavelength, nearfield intensity, charge density and sensitivity factor) between two gold nanorods is investigated by introducing a transverse shift (h) between the two resonators and then compared to the effect of the interparticle separation (g) on the same coupling parameters. FDTD electrodynamics simulation tool was employed to conduct such comparison. From the results of the simulations, it is found that as interparticle spacing increases, the above-monished parameters except charges density decay by second-order exponential function demonstrating the contribution from both multipolar and dipolar modes to the plasmonic coupling meanwhile the latter parameter drops sigmoidally with g following S-curve trend. As the two resonators are shifted transversely away from each other, both the resonance wavelength of the excited coupled mode and its corresponding sensitivity factor decay sigmoidally (S-curve trend) with h. The transverse shift-dependent behavior of the other two coupling parameters (charge density and nearfield enhancement factor) exhibits two-fold dependency on h. When h is less than the rod’s width, the fractional change of both charge density and field factor increases sigmoidally with h. As h exceeds the rod’s width, the fractional field factor drops with h and it follows a trend of a rational function meanwhile the fractional charges density decays exponentially with h. From the above findings, one can conclude that the coupling parameters observed in non-aligned resonators cannot be predicted by the proposed universal scaling (exponential) behavior in metallic homodimers.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications · Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Kreibig U, Vollmer M (1995) Optical properties of metal clusters. Springer10.1007/978-3-662-09109-8 ↗
2. Bohren CF, Huffman DR (1983) Absorption and scattering of light by small particles. Wiley
3. Kelly KL, Coronado E, Zhao LL, Schatz GC (2003) The optical properties of metal nanoparticles: the influence of size, shape, and dielectric environment. J Phys Chem B 107:668–67710.1021/jp026731y ↗
4. Jain PK, Eustis S, El-Sayed MA (2006) Plasmon coupling in nanorod assemblies: optical absorption, discrete dipole approximation simulation, and exciton-coupling model. J Phys Chem B 110:18243–1825310.1021/jp063879z ↗
5. Bachelier G, Russier-Antoine I, Benichou E, Jonin C, Del Fatti N, Valle´e F, Brevet P-F (2008) Fano profiles induced by near-field coupling in heterogeneous dimers of gold and silver nanoparticles. Phys Rev Lett 101:19740110.1103/PhysRevLett.101.197401 ↗
6. Gluodenis M, Foss CA (2002) The effect of mutual orientation on the spectra of metal nanoparticle rod-rod and rod-sphere pairs. J Phys Chem B 106:9484–948910.1021/jp014245p ↗
7. Atwater HA, Polman A (2010) Plasmonics for improved photovoltaic devices. Nature Mater 9(10):86510.1038/nmat2866 ↗
8. Jain PK, El-Sayed IH, El-Sayed MA (2007) Au nanoparticles target cancer. Nano Today 2:1810.1016/S1748-0132(07)70016-6 ↗
9. Loo CA, Lowery A, Halas N, West J, Drezek R (2005) Immunotargeted nanoshells for integrated cancer imaging and therapy. Nano Lett 5:70910.1021/nl050127s ↗
10. Sokolov K, Follen M, Aaron J, Pavlova I, Malpica A, Lotan R, Richards-Kortum R (2003) Real-time vital optical imaging of precancer using anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies conjugated to gold nanoparticles. Cancer Res 63:1999–2004
11. Loo C, Hirsch L, Lee M, Chang E, West J, Halas N, Drezek R (2004) Gold nanoshell bioconjugates for molecular imaging in living cells. Opt Lett 30:1012–101410.1364/OL.30.001012 ↗
12. Elghanian R, Storhoff JJ, Mucic RC, Letsinger RL, Mirkin CA (1997) Science 277:107810.1126/science.277.5329.1078 ↗
13. C, Mirkin, Programming the Assembly of Two- and Three-Dimensional Architectures with DNA and Nanoscale Inorganic Building Blocks, Inorg. Chem. 2000, 39, 2258.10.1021/ic991123r ↗
14. Nie S, Emory SR (1997) Probing single molecules and single nanoparticles by surface-enhanced raman scattering. Science 275:110210.1126/science.275.5303.1102 ↗
15. Amy M, Jiang M, Michaels L. Brus (2000) Ag nanocrystal junctions as the site for surface-enhanced raman scattering of single rhodamine 6G molecules. J Phys Chem B 104:1196510.1021/jp0025476 ↗
16. Jain PK, El-Sayed MA (2008) Noble metal nanoparticle pairs: effect of medium for enhanced nanosensing. Nano Lett 8:4347–435210.1021/nl8021835 ↗
17. Su K-H, Wei Q-H, Zhang X, Mock JJ, Smith DR, Schultz S (2003) Interparticle coupling effects on plasmon resonances of nanogold particles. Nano Lett 3(8):1087–109010.1021/nl034197f ↗
18. Jain PK, El-Sayed MA (2008) Surface Plasmon coupling and its universal size scaling in metal nanostructures of complex geometry: elongated particle pairs and nanosphere trimers. J Phys Chem C 112:4954–496010.1021/jp7120356 ↗
19. Gunnarsson L, Rindzevicius T, Prikulis J, Kasemo B, Käll M, Zou S, Schatz GC (2005) Confined plasmons in nanofabricated single silver particle pairs: experimental observations of strong interparticle interactions. J Phys Chem B 109:107910.1021/jp049084e ↗
20. Funston A, Novo C, Davis TJ, Mulvaney P (2009) Plasmon coupling of gold nanorods at short distances and in different geometries. Nano Lett 9:1651–165810.1021/nl900034v ↗
21. Pellarin M et al (2016) Fano transparency in rounded nanocube dimers induced by gap plasmon coupling. ACS Nano 10(12):11266–1127910.1021/acsnano.6b06406 ↗
22. Rycenga M, McLellan J, Xia Y (2008) Controlling the assembly of silver nanocubes through selective functionalization of their faces. Adv Mater 20:2416–242010.1002/adma.200800360 ↗
23. Hooshmanda N, El-Sayed MA (2019) Collective multipole oscillations direct the plasmonic coupling at the nanojunction interfaces. PNAS 116:19299–1930410.1073/pnas.1909416116 ↗
24. Mock JJ, Barbic M, Smith DR, Schultz DA, Schultz S (2002) Shape effects in plasmon resonance of individual colloidal silver nanoparticles. J Chem Phys 116:6755–675910.1063/1.1462610 ↗
25. Ross M, Mirkin C, Schatz GC (2016) Optical properties of one-, two-, and three-dimensional arrays of plasmonic nanostructures. J Phys Chem C 120(2):816–83010.1021/acs.jpcc.5b10800 ↗
26. Elghanian R, Storhoff JJ, Mucic RC, Letsinger RL, Mirkin CA (1997) Selective colorimetric detection of polynucleotides based on the distance-dependent optical properties of gold nanoparticles. Science 277:1078–108010.1126/science.277.5329.1078 ↗
27. Storhoff JJ, Elghanian R, Mucic RC, Mirkin CA, Letsinger RLJ (1959) One-pot colorimetric differentiation of polynucleotides with single base imperfections using gold nanoparticle probes. Am Chem Soc 1998:120