journal article·2020-12

Fabrication and characterization of highly porous Ti6Al4V/xTa composites for orthopedic applications

P. Garnica, R. Macías, J. Chávez, D. Bouvard, O. Jiménez, L. Olmos, D. Arteaga

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 55· Issue 34
Publisher page

Abstract

This paper presents the processing and properties of Ti6Al4V/xTa porous materials for potential use as bone implants. The processing route includes powder mixing, die pressing and solid state sintering. The porosity was created by 30 or 40 vol.% of salt particles with controlled volume fraction and size distribution, acting as space holders. The microstructure of the sintered materials was characterized by SEM and microtomography. Mechanical properties were deduced from simple compression tests, and permeability was evaluated by numerical simulations performed with real 3D microstructures. The obtained results showed various advantages of the fabricated materials. Their weight densities of the materials processed with 40 vol.% of salt particles were in the range of those of human bones. As a consequence of Ta diffusion, the final microstructures included Ta-stabilized β-Ti phase, conventional α-Ti phase, martensitic α′-Ti phase, and small residual Ta particles. Also, it was found that both Ta and salt additions reduced the Young’s modulus and the yield stress, while the permeability strongly increased with increasing vol.% of salt particles. Notably, the properties of the material processed with 30 vol.% of Ta particles and 40 vol.% of salt particles were close to those required for trabecular bone implants.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. Guo Y, Xie K, Jiang W, Wang L, Li G, Zhao S, Wu W, Hao Y (2018) In vitro and in vivo study of 3D-printed porous tantalum scaffolds for repairing bone defects. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 5(2):1123–1133. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b0109410.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b01094 ↗
2. Oshida Y (2010) Bioscience and bioengineering of titanium materials. Elsevier, Amsterdam. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-045142-8.X5000-210.1016/B978-0-08-045142-8.X5000-2 ↗
3. Wang X, Xu S, Zhou S, Xu W, Leary M, Choong P, Qian M, Brandt M, Xie YM (2016) Topological design and additive manufacturing of porous metals for bone scaffolds and orthopaedic implants: a review. Biomaterials 83:127–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.01210.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.012 ↗
4. Körner C (2016) Additive manufacturing of metallic components by selective electron beam melting—a review. Int Mater Rev 61(5):361–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/09506608.2016.117628910.1080/09506608.2016.1176289 ↗
5. Cabezas-Villa JL, Lemus-Ruiz J, Bouvard D, Jiménez O, Vergara-Hernández HJ, Olmos L (2018) Sintering study of Ti6Al4V powders with different particle sizes and their mechanical properties. Int J Min Met Mater 25(12):1389–1401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-018-1693-510.1007/s12613-018-1693-5 ↗
6. Torres Y, Lascano S, Bris J, Pavón J, Rodriguez JA (2014) Development of porous titanium for biomedical applications: a comparison between loose sintering and space-holder techniques. Mater Sci Eng C 37:148–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2013.11.03610.1016/j.msec.2013.11.036 ↗
7. Cabezas-Villa JL, Olmos L, Bouvard D, Lemus-Ruiz J, Jiménez O (2018) Processing and properties of highly porous Ti6Al4V mimicking human bones. J Mater Res 33(6):650–661. https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2018.3510.1557/jmr.2018.35 ↗
8. Niu W, Bai C, Qiu G, Wang Q (2009) Processing and properties of porous titanium using space holder technique. Mater Sci Eng A 506(1–2):148–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2008.11.02210.1016/j.msea.2008.11.022 ↗
9. Torres Y, Pavón JJ, Rodríguez JA (2012) Processing and characterization of porous titanium for implants by using NaCl as space holder. J Mater Process Technol 212(5):1061–1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.12.01510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.12.015 ↗
10. Matsuno H, Yokoyama A, Watari F, Uo M, Kawasaki T (2001) Biocompatibility and osteogenesis of refractory metal implants, titanium, hafnium, niobium, tantalum and rhenium. Biomaterials 22(11):1253–1262. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00275-110.1016/S0142-9612(00)00275-1 ↗
11. Liu Y, Bao C, Wismeijer D, Wu G (2015) The physicochemical/biological properties of porous tantalum and the potential surface modification techniques to improve its clinical application in dental implantology. Mater Sci Eng C 49:323–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.01.00710.1016/j.msec.2015.01.007 ↗
12. Wu CY, Xin YH, Wang XF, Lin JG (2010) Effects of Ta content on the phase stability and elastic properties of β Ti–Ta alloys from first-principles calculations. Solid State Sci 12(12):2120–2124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2010.09.00910.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2010.09.009 ↗
13. Balla VK, Banerjee S, Bose S, Bandyopadhyay A (2010) Direct laser processing of a tantalum coating on titanium for bone replacement structures. Acta Biomater 6(6):2329–2334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2009.11.02110.1016/j.actbio.2009.11.021 ↗
14. Wang Q, Zhang H, Li Q, Ye L, Gan H, Liu Y, Wang H, Wang Z (2015) Biocompatibility and osteogenic properties of porous tantalum. Exp Ther Med 9(3):780–786. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2015.220810.3892/etm.2015.2208 ↗
15. Liu Y, Li K, Wu H, Song M, Wang W, Li N, Tang H (2015) Synthesis of Ti–Ta alloys with dual structure by incomplete diffusion between elemental powders. J Mech Behav Biomed 51:302–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.07.00410.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.07.004 ↗
16. Song Y, Xu DS, Yang R, Li D, Wu WT, Guo ZX (1999) Theoretical study of the effects of alloying elements on the strength and modulus of β-type bio-titanium alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 260(1–2):269–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(98)00886-710.1016/S0921-5093(98)00886-7 ↗
17. Zhou YL, Niinomi M (2009) Ti–25Ta alloy with the best mechanical compatibility in Ti–Ta alloys for biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng C 29(3):1061–1065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2008.09.01210.1016/j.msec.2008.09.012 ↗
18. Buenconsejo PJS, Kim HY, Miyazaki S (2009) Effect of ternary alloying elements on the shape memory behavior of Ti–Ta alloys. Acta Mater 57(8):2509–2515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2009.02.00710.1016/j.actamat.2009.02.007 ↗
19. Machado LG, Savi MA (2003) Medical applications of shape memory alloys. Braz J Med Biol Res 36:683–691. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-879X200300060000110.1590/S0100-879X2003000600001 ↗
20. Olmos L, Cabezas-Villa JL, Bouvard D, Lemus-Ruiz J, Jiménez O, Falcón-Franco LA (2020) Synthesis and characterisation of Ti6Al4V/xTa alloy processed by solid state sintering. Powder Metall 63(1):64–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/00325899.2020.171968910.1080/00325899.2020.1719689 ↗
21. Buenconsejo PJS, Kim HY, Miyazaki S (2011) Novel β-TiTaAl alloys with excellent cold workability and a stable high-temperature shape memory effect. Scr Mater 64(12):1114–1117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.03.00410.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.03.004 ↗
22. Chávez J, Olmos L, Jiménez O, Bouvard D, Rodríguez E, Flores M (2017) Sintering behaviour and mechanical characterisation of Ti64/x TiN composites and bilayer components. Powder Metall 60(4):257–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/00325899.2017.128058510.1080/00325899.2017.1280585 ↗
23. Olmos L, Bouvard D, Cabezas-Villa JL, Lemus-Ruiz J, Jiménez O, Arteaga D (2019) Analysis of compression and permeability behavior of porous Ti6Al4V by computed microtomography. Met Mater Int 25(3):669–682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-018-00223-w10.1007/s12540-018-00223-w ↗
24. Miller KJ, Zhu WL, Montési LG, Gaetani GA (2014) Experimental quantification of permeability of partially molten mantle rock. Earth Planet Sc Lett 388:273–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2013.12.00310.1016/j.epsl.2013.12.003 ↗
25. Okuma G, Kadowaki D, Shinoda Y, Akatsu T, Guillon O, Wakai F (2016) Determination of the size of representative volume element for viscous sintering. J Ceram Soc Jpn 124(4):421–425. https://doi.org/10.2109/jcersj2.1527510.2109/jcersj2.15275 ↗
26. Zhou YL, Niinomi M, Akahori T (2004) Effects of Ta content on Young’s modulus and tensile properties of binary Ti–Ta alloys for biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng A 371(1–2):283–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2003.12.01110.1016/j.msea.2003.12.011 ↗
27. Zhou YL, Niinomi M, Akahori T (2004) Decomposition of martensite α″ during aging treatments and resulting mechanical properties of Ti–Ta alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 384(1–2):92–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2004.05.08410.1016/j.msea.2004.05.084 ↗
28. Ma YQ, Jin WJ, Yang SY, Zhang JB, Huang YX, Liu XJ (2009) Microstructure and shape memory properties of biomedical Ti-(40–65) Ta (wt%) alloys. Mater Sci Forum 610:1382–1386. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.610-613.138210.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.610-613.1382 ↗
29. Babin P, Della Valle G, Chiron H, Cloetens P, Hoszowska J, Pernot P, Réguerre AL, Salvo L, Dendievel R (2006) Fast X-ray tomography analysis of bubble growth and foam setting during breadmaking. J Cereal Sci 43(3):393–39710.1016/j.jcs.2005.12.002 ↗
30. Cameron JR, Skofronick JG, Grant RM (1999) Physics of the body second edition madison. Medical Physics Publishing, Madison
31. Warrell DA, Firth JD, Cox TM (1996) The skeletal system. Oxford text book of medicine, vol 3, 3rd edn. Medical Publications, New York
32. Adamovic D, Ristic B, Zivic F (2018) Review of existing biomaterials—method of material selection for specific applications in orthopedics. Springer, Berlin, pp 47–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68025-5_310.1007/978-3-319-68025-5_3 ↗
33. Murray JL (1981) The Ta–Ti (tantalum–titanium) system. Bull Alloy Phase Diagr 2(1):62–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0287370510.1007/BF02873705 ↗
34. Hong E, Kaplin B, You T, Suh MS, Kim YS, Choe H (2011) Tribological properties of copper alloy-based composites reinforced with tungsten carbide particles. Wear 270(9–10):591–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2011.01.01510.1016/j.wear.2011.01.015 ↗
35. Xu S, Liu Y, Yang C, Zhao H, Liu B, Li J, Song M (2018) Compositionally gradient Ti–Ta metal–metal composite with ultra-high strength. Mater Sci Eng A 712:386–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.11.08910.1016/j.msea.2017.11.089 ↗
36. Bansiddhi A, Sargeant TD, Stupp SI, Dunand DC (2008) Porous NiTi for bone implants: a review. Acta Biomater 4(4):773–782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2008.02.00910.1016/j.actbio.2008.02.009 ↗
37. Braem A, Chaudhari A, Cardoso MV, Schrooten J, Duyck J, Vleugels J (2014) Peri-and intra-implant bone response to microporous Ti coatings with surface modification. Acta Biomater 10(2):986–995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.10.01710.1016/j.actbio.2013.10.017 ↗
38. Taniguchi N, Fujibayashi S, Takemoto M, Sasaki K, Otsuki B, Nakamura T, Matsushita T, Kokubo T, Matsuda S (2016) Effect of pore size on bone ingrowth into porous titanium implants fabricated by additive manufacturing: an in vivo experiment. Mater Sci Eng C 59:690–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.10.06910.1016/j.msec.2015.10.069 ↗
39. Itälä AI, Ylänen HO, Ekholm C, Karlsson KH, Aro HT (2001) Pore diameter of more than 100 μm is not requisite for bone ingrowth in rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 58(6):679–683. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.106910.1002/jbm.1069 ↗
40. Krishna BV, Xue W, Bose S, Bandyopadhyay A (2008) Engineered porous metals for implants. JOM 60(5):45–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-008-0059-210.1007/s11837-008-0059-2 ↗
41. Barba D, Alabort E, Reed RC (2019) Synthetic bone: design by additive manufacturing. Acta Biomater 97:637–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.07.04910.1016/j.actbio.2019.07.049 ↗
42. Nauman EA, Fong KE, Keaveny TM (1999) Dependence of intertrabecular permeability on flow direction and anatomic site. Ann Biomed Eng 27(4):517–524. https://doi.org/10.1114/1.19510.1114/1.195 ↗
43. Soro N, Attar H, Brodie E, Veidt M, Molotnikov A, Dargusch MS (2019) Evaluation of the mechanical compatibility of additively manufactured porous Ti–25Ta alloy for load-bearing implant applications. J Mech Behav Biomed 97:149–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.05.01910.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.05.019 ↗
44. Bandyopadhyay A, Mitra I, Shivaram A, Dasgupta N, Bose S (2019) Direct comparison of additively manufactured porous titanium and tantalum implants towards in vivo osseointegration. Addit Manuf 28:259–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.04.02510.1016/j.addma.2019.04.025 ↗