journal article·2016-09

Characterization of maghemite (γ-Fe2O3)-loaded poly-l-lactic acid/thermoplastic polyurethane electrospun mats for soft tissue engineering

Ehsan Fallahiarezoudar, Mohaddeseh Ahmadipourroudposht, Ani Idris, Noordin Mohd Yusof, Mohsen Marvibaigi, Muhammad Irfan

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 51· Issue 18
Publisher page

Abstract

This study proposed a new mixture of three different biocompatible and biodegradable materials for soft tissue which needs elasticity and stretchability as well as stiffness. Five different ratios of poly-l-lactic acid (PLLA)/thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) blend containing 1 % (w/v) maghemite (γ-Fe2O3) nanoparticles were electrospun and characterized in terms of morphology, degradation rate, biological compatibility, and mechanical properties for tunable properties. Neat PLLA/TPU samples were used for maghemite effect verification. The existence of three components in the electrospun mats was confirmed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Scanning electron microscopy images illustrated well-fabricated nanofibers with smaller diameter distribution for PLLA. The MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay using human skin fibroblast cell indicates desired proliferation and migrant over the samples. Blood biocompatibility results in terms of clotting time, fibrin formation, and hemolysis were almost in the normal range. Samples’ degradation rate was investigated over 24 weeks where the PLLA shows 47.15 % mass change, while 6.7 % of TPU mass changed. High tensile strength and an extremely low elongation at break were determined from the stress–strain curve for PLLA, while TPU exhibits high elasticity. The 50:50 % ratio of 1 % (w/v) maghemite-loaded PLLA/TPU scaffold presents an overall satisfaction.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. Joy J et al (2015) Fabrication of smooth electrospun nanofibrous gelatin mat for potential application in tissue engineering. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater 64(10):509–51810.1080/00914037.2014.977898 ↗
2. Bao J et al (2013) Electrospun antimicrobial microfibrous scaffold for annulus fibrosus tissue engineering. J Mater Sci 48(12):4223–4232. doi: 10.1007/s10853-013-7235-710.1007/s10853-013-7235-7 ↗
3. Wu S et al (2014) Biomimetic porous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng R: Rep 80:1–3610.1016/j.mser.2014.04.001 ↗
4. Hosseinkazemi H et al (2015) Modification of PCL electrospun nanofibrous mat with calendula officinalis extract for improved interaction with cells. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater 64(9):459–46410.1080/00914037.2014.958835 ↗
5. Ahmadipourroudposht M et al (2015) Application of response surface methodology in optimization of electrospinning process to fabricate (ferrofluid/polyvinyl alcohol) magnetic nanofibers. Mater Sci Eng C 50:234–24110.1016/j.msec.2015.02.008 ↗
6. Bini T et al (2006) Poly (l-lactide-co-glycolide) biodegradable microfibers and electrospun nanofibers for nerve tissue engineering: an in vitro study. J Mater Sci 41(19):6453–6459. doi: 10.1007/s10853-006-0714-310.1007/s10853-006-0714-3 ↗
7. Jia L et al (2013) Biocompatibility evaluation of protein-incorporated electrospun polyurethane-based scaffolds with smooth muscle cells for vascular tissue engineering. J Mater Sci 48(15):5113–5124. doi: 10.1007/s10853-013-7359-910.1007/s10853-013-7359-9 ↗
8. Fallahiarezoudar E et al (2015) A review of: application of synthetic scaffold in tissue engineering heart valves. Mater Sci Eng C 48:556–56510.1016/j.msec.2014.12.016 ↗
9. Hutmacher DW (2000) Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials 21(24):2529–254310.1016/S0142-9612(00)00121-6 ↗
10. Mehrasa M et al (2016) Incorporation of zeolite and silica nanoparticles into electrospun PVA/collagen nanofibrous scaffolds: the influence on the physical, chemical properties and cell behavior. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater 65(9):457–46510.1080/00914037.2015.1129958 ↗
11. Liu N-H et al (2014) Electrospinning of poly (ε-caprolactone-co-lactide)/Pluronic blended scaffolds for skin tissue engineering. J Mater Sci 49(20):7253–7262. doi: 10.1007/s10853-014-8432-810.1007/s10853-014-8432-8 ↗
12. Qazi TH et al (2015) Biomaterials based strategies for skeletal muscle tissue engineering: existing technologies and future trends. Biomaterials 53:502–52110.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.02.110 ↗
13. Hasan A et al (2014) Electrospun scaffolds for tissue engineering of vascular grafts. Acta Biomater 10(1):11–2510.1016/j.actbio.2013.08.022 ↗
14. Costa PF et al (2014) Advanced tissue engineering scaffold design for regeneration of the complex hierarchical periodontal structure. J Clin Periodontol 41(3):283–29410.1111/jcpe.12214 ↗
15. Koysuren O et al (2014) Electrospun polyvinyl borate/poly (methyl methacrylate)(PVB/PMMA) blend nanofibers. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater 63(7):337–34110.1080/00914037.2013.845188 ↗
16. Yang S et al (2001) The design of scaffolds for use in tissue engineering. Part I. Traditional factors. Tissue Eng 7(6):679–68910.1089/107632701753337645 ↗
17. Martin JR et al (2014) A porous tissue engineering scaffold selectively degraded by cell-generated reactive oxygen species. Biomaterials 35(12):3766–377610.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.01.026 ↗
18. Mendelson K, Schoen FJ (2006) Heart valve tissue engineering: concepts, approaches, progress, and challenges. Ann Biomed Eng 34(12):1799–181910.1007/s10439-006-9163-z ↗
19. Ocal H et al (2014) 5-Fluorouracil-loaded PLA/PLGA PEG-PPG-PEG polymeric nanoparticles: formulation, in vitro characterization and cell culture studies. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 40(4):560–56710.3109/03639045.2013.775581 ↗
20. Fallahiarezoudar E, Ahmadipourroudposht M, Yusof NM (2015) Geometric modeling of aortic heart valve. Proc Manuf 2:135–140
21. Palacios J et al (2015) Characterization and thermal degradation kinetics of poly (l-lactide) nanocomposites with carbon nanotubes. Polym Eng Sci 55(3):710–71810.1002/pen.23936 ↗
22. Wei Y et al (2011) Magnetic biodegradable Fe3O4/CS/PVA nanofibrous membranes for bone regeneration. Biomed Mater 6(5):05500810.1088/1748-6041/6/5/055008 ↗
23. Schmidt CE, Baier JM (2000) Acellular vascular tissues: natural biomaterials for tissue repair and tissue engineering. Biomaterials 21(22):2215–223110.1016/S0142-9612(00)00148-4 ↗
24. Dixit P et al (2001) Vascular graft endothelialization: comparative analysis of canine and human endothelial cell migration on natural biomaterials. J Biomed Mater Res 56(4):545–55510.1002/1097-4636(20010915)56:4<545::AID-JBM1126>3.0.CO;2-V ↗
25. Yoon H, Ahn S, Kim G (2009) Three-dimensional polycaprolactone hierarchical scaffolds supplemented with natural biomaterials to enhance mesenchymal stem cell proliferation. Macromol Rapid Commun 30(19):1632–163710.1002/marc.200900264 ↗
26. Samouillan V et al (2011) The use of thermal techniques for the characterization and selection of natural biomaterials. J Funct Biomater 2(3):230–24810.3390/jfb2030230 ↗
27. Lutolf M, Hubbell J (2005) Synthetic biomaterials as instructive extracellular microenvironments for morphogenesis in tissue engineering. Nat Biotechnol 23(1):47–5510.1038/nbt1055 ↗
28. Pariente J-L, Kim B-S, Atala A (2002) In vitro biocompatibility evaluation of naturally derived and synthetic biomaterials using normal human bladder smooth muscle cells. J Urol 167(4):1867–187110.1016/S0022-5347(05)65251-2 ↗
29. Bawazer L (2015) Bio focus: synthetic biomaterials advance stem cell engineering. MRS Bull 40(10):792–79310.1557/mrs.2015.239 ↗
30. Li Q, Ma L, Gao C (2015) Biomaterials for in situ tissue regeneration: development and perspectives. J Mater Chem B 3(46):8921–893810.1039/C5TB01863C ↗
31. Mi H-Y et al (2013) Characterization of thermoplastic polyurethane/polylactic acid (TPU/PLA) tissue engineering scaffolds fabricated by microcellular injection molding. Mater Sci Eng C 33(8):4767–477610.1016/j.msec.2013.07.037 ↗
32. Rodenas-Rochina J, Vidaurre A, Cortázar IC, Lebourg M (2015) Effects of hydroxyapatite filler on long-term hydrolytic degradation of PLLA/PCL porous scaffolds. Polymer Degrad Stab 119:121–13110.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2015.04.015 ↗
33. Salehi M et al (2015) Preparation of pure PLLA, pure chitosan, and PLLA/chitosan blend porous tissue engineering scaffolds by thermally induced phase separation method and evaluation of the corresponding mechanical and biological properties. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater 64(13):675–68210.1080/00914037.2014.1002093 ↗
34. Gonçalves F et al (2015) Hybrid membranes of PLLA/collagen for bone tissue engineering: a comparative study of scaffold production techniques for optimal mechanical properties and osteoinduction ability. Materials 8(2):408–42310.3390/ma8020408 ↗
35. Raghavendran HRB et al (2016) Synergistic interaction of platelet derived growth factor (PDGF) with the surface of PLLA/Col/HA and PLLA/HA scaffolds produces rapid osteogenic differentiation. Colloids Surf B 139:68–7810.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.11.053 ↗
36. Raja M, Ryu SH, Shanmugharaj A (2013) Thermal, mechanical and electroactive shape memory properties of polyurethane (PU)/poly (lactic acid)(PLA)/CNT nanocomposites. Eur Polymer J 49(11):3492–350010.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.08.009 ↗
37. Ngadiman NHA et al (2015) γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles filled polyvinyl alcohol as potential biomaterial for tissue engineering scaffold. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 49:90–10410.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.04.029 ↗
38. Fallahiarezoudar E et al (2015) Fabrication (ferrofluid/polyvinyl alcohol) magnetic nanofibers via co-axial electrospinning. J Dispers Sci Technol 36(1):28–3110.1080/01932691.2014.888005 ↗
39. Fallahiarezoudar E et al (2015) Influence of process factors on diameter of core (γ-Fe2O3)/shell (polyvinyl alcohol) structure magnetic nanofibers during co-axial electrospinning. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater 64(1):15–2410.1080/00914037.2014.886239 ↗
40. Prabhakaran MP, Venugopal J, Ramakrishna S (2009) Electrospun nanostructured scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 5(8):2884–289310.1016/j.actbio.2009.05.007 ↗
41. Amarjargal A et al (2013) Controlled assembly of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles on electrospun PU nanofibrous membrane: a novel heat-generating substrate for magnetic hyperthermia application. Eur Polymer J 49(12):3796–380510.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.08.026 ↗
42. Arrieta M et al (2014) Multifunctional PLA–PHB/cellulose nanocrystal films: processing, structural and thermal properties. Carbohydr Polym 107:16–2410.1016/j.carbpol.2014.02.044 ↗
43. Haroosh HJ, Dong Y (2015) Electrospun poly (lactic acid)(PLA): poly (ε-caprolactone)(PCL)/halloysite nanotube (HNT) composite fibers: synthesis and characterization. In: Fillers and reinforcements for advanced nanocomposites, p 59
44. Idris A et al (2010) Photocatalytic magnetic separable beads for chromium (VI) reduction. Water Res 44(6):1683–168810.1016/j.watres.2009.11.026 ↗
45. Kang Y et al (2009) A study on the in vitro degradation properties of poly (l-lactic acid)/β-tricalcium phosphate (PLLA/β-TCP) scaffold under dynamic loading. Med Eng Phys 31(5):589–59410.1016/j.medengphy.2008.11.014 ↗
46. Chan K-C, Yin M-C, Chao W-J (2007) Effect of diallyl trisulfide-rich garlic oil on blood coagulation and plasma activity of anticoagulation factors in rats. Food Chem Toxicol 45(3):502–50710.1016/j.fct.2006.10.005 ↗
47. Deng Y et al (2015) effect of surface roughness on osteogenesis in vitro and osseointegration in vivo of carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone–nanohydroxyapatite composite. Int J Nanomed 10:1425
48. Ponsonnet L et al (2003) Relationship between surface properties (roughness, wettability) of titanium and titanium alloys and cell behaviour. Mater Sci Eng C 23(4):551–56010.1016/S0928-4931(03)00033-X ↗
49. Deligianni DD et al (2000) Effect of surface roughness of hydroxyapatite on human bone marrow cell adhesion, proliferation, differentiation and detachment strength. Biomaterials 22(1):87–9610.1016/S0142-9612(00)00174-5 ↗
50. Zhang P et al (2015) Water-permeable polylactide blend membranes for hydrophilicity-based separation. Chem Eng J 269:180–18510.1016/j.cej.2015.01.111 ↗
51. Pratsinis SE, Vemury S (1996) Particle formation in gases: a review. Powder Technol 88(3):267–27310.1016/S0032-5910(96)03130-0 ↗
52. Gupta AK, Gupta M (2005) Synthesis and surface engineering of iron oxide nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Biomaterials 26(18):3995–402110.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.10.012 ↗
53. Klabunde KJ, Richards R (2009) Nanoscale materials in chemistry. Wiley, New York10.1002/9780470523674 ↗