journal article·2008-06

The role of surface morphology on the strength and failure mode of polymer fibre reinforced single lap joints

D. Tzetzis

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 43· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

The present study shows the relation between the surface properties of composite materials, treated with common surface preparation methods, and the mechanically measured bond strengths as quoted from lap-shear tests. The surface properties are studied by roughness measurements, surface free energy assessment, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy. The procedures followed, reveal the measure of significance of the mechanical interlocking, kinetics of wetting, chemical reactivity and intermolecular adhesion of the interfaces. It is shown that the governing adhesion qualities determine significantly the fragmentation process and the strength of the joints alongside the load transfer mechanism that is analysed by a simple finite element model. Based on the results, an emphasis is given on elucidating the difference between the intrinsic interfacial adhesion strength and the measured bond strength.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Armstrong KB, Barrett R (1998) Care and repair of advance composites. Society of Automotive Engineers International
2. Tzetzis D, Hogg PJ, Jogia M (2003) J Adhes Sci Technol 17(3):309. doi:https://doi.org/10.1163/15685610376286464210.1163/156856103762864642 ↗
3. Tzetzis D, Hogg PJ (2006) Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 37:1239. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.09.00810.1016/j.compositesa.2005.09.008 ↗
4. Tzetzis D, Hogg PJ (2008) Mater Desig 29(2):436. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2007.01.00210.1016/j.matdes.2007.01.002 ↗
5. Tsai MY, Morton J (1995) Compos Struct 32:123. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-8223(95)00059-310.1016/0263-8223(95)00059-3 ↗
6. Lang TP, Mallick PK (1998) Int J Adhes Adhes 18:167. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-7496(97)00056-010.1016/S0143-7496(97)00056-0 ↗
7. Adams RD, Davies R (1996) J Adhes 59:171. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0021846960801108610.1080/00218469608011086 ↗
8. Matthews FL, Tester TT (1985) Int J Adhes Adhes 5(1):13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0143-7496(85)90040-510.1016/0143-7496(85)90040-5 ↗
9. Kim K-S, Yoo J-S, Yi Y-M, Kim C-G (2006) Compos Struct 72:477. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.01.02310.1016/j.compstruct.2005.01.023 ↗
10. Kairouz KC, Matthews FL (1993) Composites 24(6):475. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4361(93)90017-310.1016/0010-4361(93)90017-3 ↗
11. Crane LW, Hamermesh CL, Maus L (1976) SAMPE J 12:6
12. Parker BM, Waghorne RM (1982) Composites 13:28010.1016/0010-4361(82)90011-8 ↗
13. Moyer DJD, Wightman JP (1989) Surf Interface Anal 14:496. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.74014090310.1002/sia.740140903 ↗
14. Parker BM, Waghorne RM (1991) Surf Interface Anal 17(7):471. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.74017071010.1002/sia.740170710 ↗
15. Wingfield JRJ (1993) Int J Adhes Adhes 13(3):151. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0143-7496(93)90036-910.1016/0143-7496(93)90036-9 ↗
16. Chin JW, Wightman JP (1996) Compos Part A 27A:41910.1016/1359-835X(95)00064-9 ↗
17. Wilhelmy J (1863) Ann Physik 119:17710.1002/andp.18631950602 ↗
18. Carre A, Schultz J (1083) J Adhes 15:15110.1080/00218468308073223 ↗
19. Tsai MY, Morton J, Matthews J (1995) J Compos Mater 29:115410.1177/002199839502900906 ↗
20. Owens DK, Wendt RC (1969) J Appl Polym Sci 13:1971. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1969.07013081510.1002/app.1969.070130815 ↗
21. Kaelble DH (1971) Physical chemistry of adhesion. Wiley Interscience, pp 149–189
22. Pocius AV, Wenz RP (1985) In: Proc 30th National SAMPE Symposium, vol 30, pp 1073–1087
23. Dynes PJ, Kaelble DH (1974) J Adhes 6:195. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0021846740807502610.1080/00218467408075026 ↗
24. Bénard Q, Fois M, Grisel M (2005) Compos Part A 36 1562. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.02.01210.1016/j.compositesa.2005.02.012 ↗
25. Kim JK, Kim HS, Lee DG (2003) J Adhes Sci Technol 17(3):329. doi:https://doi.org/10.1163/15685610376286465110.1163/156856103762864651 ↗
26. Packham DE (1992) J Adhes 37:137. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0021846920802654510.1080/00218469208026545 ↗