journal article·2011-03

Effect of annealing process in water on the essential work of fracture response of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene

Sinan Yilmaz, Taner Yilmaz, A. Armagan Arici

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 46· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

The toughness of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) before and after annealing process in water was investigated by the essential work of fracture (EWF) method. Annealing in water at 80 °C for various aging periods of the 5 mm thickness with various ligament lengths single edge notched tension (SENT) specimens was performed in hot water. Tensile tests were performed at 2 mm/min constant deformation rate at room temperature in order to determine EWF parameters. After tensile tests, the fracture cross-sections of SENT specimens were investigated by scanning electron microscope (SEM). From the 60th day of annealing process in water, it was seen that the fracture toughness of the material decreased while water absorption in samples increased.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer crystallization and properties · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Broberg KB (1968) Int J Fract 4:1110.1007/BF00189139 ↗
2. Barany T, Karger-Kocsis J, Czigany T (2003) Polym Degrad Stab 82:27110.1016/S0141-3910(03)00221-0 ↗
3. Arkhireyeva A, Hashemi S (2001) Polymer 43:28910.1016/S0032-3861(01)00623-1 ↗
4. Mouzakis DE, Stricker F, Mülhaupt R, Karger-Kocsis J (1998) J Mater Sci 33:2551. doi: 10.1023/A:100434501710510.1023/A:1004345017105 ↗
5. Hashemi S (2003) J Mater Sci 38:3055. doi: 10.1023/A:102475250845810.1023/A:1024752508458 ↗
6. Mai YW, Cotterell B (1986) Int J Fract 32:10510.1007/BF00019787 ↗
7. Arkhireyeva A, Hashemi S, O’brien M (1999) J Mater Sci 34:5961. doi: 10.1023/A:100477662738910.1023/A:1004776627389 ↗
8. Arkhireyeva A, Hashemi S (2002) J Mater Sci 37:3675. doi: 10.1023/A:101656122528110.1023/A:1016561225281 ↗
9. Barany T, Ronkay F, Karger-Kocsis J, Czigany T (2005) Int J Fract 135:25110.1007/s10704-005-3947-2 ↗
10. Karger-Kocsis J (1996) Polym Bull 37:11910.1007/BF00313827 ↗
11. Yang W, Xie BH, Shi W, Zuo M, Li ZM, Yang MB (2005) J Mater Sci 40:5323. doi: 10.1007/s10853-005-4398-x10.1007/s10853-005-4398-x ↗
12. Hashemi S (2003) Polym Test 22:58910.1016/S0142-9418(02)00162-9 ↗
13. Naz S, Sweeny J, Coates PD (2010) J Mater Sci 45:448. doi: 10.1007/s10853-009-3961-210.1007/s10853-009-3961-2 ↗
14. Chen H, Karger-Kocsis J, Wu J (2004) Polymer 45:637510.1016/j.polymer.2004.07.007 ↗
15. Barany T, Czigany T, Karger-Kocsis J (2003) Periodica Polytechnica Ser Mech Eng 47:91
16. Karger-Kocsis J, Moskala EJ (2000) Polymer 41:630110.1016/S0032-3861(99)00866-6 ↗
17. Gong G, Xie BH, Yang WY, Li ZM, Zhang WQ, Yang MB (2005) Polym Test 24:41010.1016/j.polymertesting.2005.02.004 ↗
18. Gong G, Xie BH, Yang W, Li ZM, Lai SM, Yang MB (2006) Polym Test 25:9810.1016/j.polymertesting.2005.09.010 ↗
19. Yilmaz T (2010) J Mater Sci 45:2381. doi: 10.1007/s10853-009-4204-210.1007/s10853-009-4204-2 ↗
20. Cao J, Chen L (2005) Polym Compos 26:71310.1002/pc.20148 ↗