Fabrication of fibre reinforced green bodies by electrophoretic deposition of silicon powder from aqueous suspensions
Source abstract
Abstract
Fine silicon powders with a mean particle size of 0.5 μm were used to prepare aqueous suspensions for electrophoretic deposition (EPD). A cellulose film membrane was proved to be a cost-efficient alternative material to the dialysis hoses with excellent properties for the EPD-process. Several organic additives were tested to stabilise the suspension against sedimentation effects, to increase the electrophoretic mobility of particles and to optimise the mechanical properties of the dried green bodies. Mainly the electrokinetic sonic analysis (ESA) was used to characterise the influence of the additives and several parameters like solids content and ionic strength on the thickness of the electrical double layer. A computer-controlled and monitored EPD led to a dense and homogeneous packing of the powder and contributes to the understanding of deposition mechanisms. Even severe machining of the dried green bodies was possible. Using the planetary milled silicon powder the small spaces between the carbon (C-) or silicon carbide (SiC-) monofilaments of the fibre fabrics were infiltrated homogeneously by the silicon particles.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrophoretic Deposition in Materials Science · TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Electrowetting and Microfluidic Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (15)
Show source-provided references
1. I. Zhitomirsky, Adv. Coll. Interf. Sci. 97 (2002) 279.10.1016/S0001-8686(01)00068-9 ↗
2. G. Ziegler, J. Heinrich and G. WÖtting, J. Mater. Sci. 22 (1987) 3041.10.1007/BF01161167 ↗
3. G. H. Wroblewska and G. Ziegler, in Proceedings of “Verbundwerkstoffe und Werkstoffverbunde” (Kaiserslautern, 1997) p. 215.
4. R. T. Bhatt and A. R. Palczer, J. Mater. Sci. 34 (1999) 1483.10.1023/A:1004591508874 ↗
5. L. L. Shaw, Z. Yang and R. Ren, J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 81 (1998) 760.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02407.x ↗
6. R. T. Bhatt, Ceram. Int. 23 (1997) 109.10.1016/S0272-8842(96)00004-1 ↗
7. R. T. Bhatt and A. R. Palczer, J. Mater. Sci. 32 (1997) 1039.10.1023/A:1018586624315 ↗
8. R. T. Bhatt, Ceram. Int. 26 (2000) 535.10.1016/S0272-8842(99)00091-7 ↗
9. A. R. Boccaccini, C. Kaya and K. K. Chawla, Comp. Part A 32 (2001) 997.
10. R. Clasen, in “Science, Technology, and Applications of Colloidal Suspensions” (Ceramic Transactions, Amer. Ceram. Soc., 1995) Vol. 54, p. 169.
11. R. Clasen, S. Janes, C. Oswald and D. Ranker, in “Ceramic Processing Science and Technology,” (Ceramic Transactions, Amer. Ceram. Soc., 1995) Vol. 51, p. 481.
12. I. Hector and R. Clasen, Ceram. Ing. Sci. Proc. 18 (1997) 173.10.1002/9780470294420.ch18 ↗
13. V. A. Hackley, U. Paik, B.-H. Kim and S. G. Malghan, J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 80 (1997) 1781.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1997.tb03052.x ↗
14. I. Zhitomirsky, Adv. Coll. Interf. Sci. 97 (2002) 279.10.1016/S0001-8686(01)00068-9 ↗
15. C. Kaya, F. Kaya, A. R. Boccaccini and K. K. Chawla, Acta Mater. 49 (2001) 1189.10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00018-0 ↗