Gate Control of the Current–Flux Relation of a Josephson Quantum Interferometer Based on Proximitized Metallic Nanojuntions
Source abstract
Abstract
We demonstrate an Al superconducting quantum interference device in which the Josephson junctions are implemented through gate-controlled proximity Cu mesoscopic weak links. This specific kind of metallic weak links behaves analogously to genuine superconducting metals in terms of the response to electrostatic gating and provides a good performance in terms of current-modulation visibility. We show that through the application of a static gate voltage we can modify the interferometer current-flux relation in a fashion that seems compatible with the introduction of π-channels within the gated weak link. Our results suggest that the microscopic mechanism at the origin of the suppression of the switching current in the interferometer is apparently phase coherent, resulting in an overall damping of the superconducting phase rigidity. We finally tackle the performance of the interferometer in terms of responsivity to magnetic flux variations in the dissipative regime and discuss the practical relevance of gated proximity-based all-metallic SQUIDs for magnetometry at the nanoscale.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism · Quantum and electron transport phenomena · Surface and Thin Film Phenomena
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
NEST, Istituto Nanoscienze-CNR and Scuola Normale Superiore, I-56127 Pisa, Italy
Department of Physics “E. Fermi”, Universitá di Pisa, Largo Pontecorvo 3, I-56127 Pisa, Italy
Dipartimento di Fisica “E. R. Caianiello”, Universitá di Salerno, Fisciano, Salerno IT-84084, Italy
SPIN-CNR, Fisciano, Salerno IT-84084, Italy
Funding
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme · H2020 European Research Council
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41565-018-0190-310.1038/s41565-018-0190-3 ↗
2. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0101010.1021/acs.nanolett.8b01010 ↗
3. 10.1116/1.512936410.1116/1.5129364 ↗
4. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.02406110.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.024061 ↗
5. 10.1063/5.001130410.1063/5.0011304 ↗
6. 10.3390/ma1405124310.3390/ma14051243 ↗
7. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c0354710.1021/acs.nanolett.0c03547 ↗
8. 10.1109/55.3242910.1109/55.32429 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.10887710.1063/1.108877 ↗
10. 10.1016/0925-8388(93)90791-K10.1016/0925-8388(93)90791-K ↗
11. 10.1109/16.14123210.1109/16.141232 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.344110.1103/PhysRevLett.65.3441 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.11670410.1063/1.116704 ↗
14. 10.1126/science.111352310.1126/science.1113523 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.22450610.1103/PhysRevB.100.224506 ↗
16. Tinkham, M. Introduction to Superconductivity; Dover Publications: 2004; p 454.
17. 10.1038/s41467-021-21231-210.1038/s41467-021-21231-2 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41565-020-00834-810.1038/s41565-020-00834-8 ↗
19. Golokolenov, I.; Guthrie, A.; Kafanov, S.; Pashkin, Y.; Tsepelin, V. On the origin of the controversial electrostatic field effect in superconductors. arXiv:2009.00683, 2020.10.1038/s41467-021-22998-0 ↗
20. Ritter, M. F.; Crescini, N.; Haxell, D. Z.; Hinderling, M.; Riel, H.; Bruder, C.; Fuhrer, A.; Nichele, F. On the Role of Out-of-Equilibrium Phonons in Gated Superconducting Switches. arXiv:2106.01816, 2021.10.1038/s41928-022-00721-1 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsnano.0c0535510.1021/acsnano.0c05355 ↗
22. 10.1063/5.001351210.1063/5.0013512 ↗
23. Puglia, C.; De Simoni, G.; Giazotto, F. Phase slips dynamics in gated Ti and V all-metallic supercurrent nano-transistors: a review. arXiv:2102.10699, 2021.10.1088/1361-6463/ac2e8b ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.02338710.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.023387 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.11700110.1103/PhysRevLett.126.117001 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRev.82.66410.1103/PhysRev.82.664 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.14.03404110.1103/PhysRevApplied.14.034041 ↗
28. Mercaldo, M. T.; Giazotto, F.; Cuoco, M. Spectroscopic Signatures of Gate-Controlled Superconducting Phases. arXiv:2012.01490, 2020.10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.043042 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.03335310.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.033353 ↗
30. Clarke, J.; Braginski, A. I. In The SQUID Handbook; Clarke, J., Braginski, A. I., Eds. Wiley: 2004; Vol. 1, pp 1–395.10.1002/3527603646 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.7.5110.1103/PhysRevLett.7.51 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.7.4310.1103/PhysRevLett.7.43 ↗
33. 10.1016/0031-9163(62)91369-010.1016/0031-9163(62)91369-0 ↗
34. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b0236910.1021/acs.nanolett.9b02369 ↗
35. 10.1023/A:100463522682510.1023/A:1004635226825 ↗
36. 10.1063/1.481701310.1063/1.4817013 ↗
37. 10.1063/1.486247710.1063/1.4862477 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.16540810.1103/PhysRevB.77.165408 ↗
39. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0220910.1021/acsnano.9b02209 ↗
40. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.06700210.1103/PhysRevLett.101.067002 ↗
41. 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.06450210.1103/PhysRevB.63.064502 ↗
42. 10.1103/RevModPhys.78.21710.1103/RevModPhys.78.217 ↗
43. 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.18451310.1103/PhysRevB.66.184513 ↗
44. 10.1063/1.290892210.1063/1.2908922 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.physrep.2015.12.00110.1016/j.physrep.2015.12.001 ↗