journal article·2017-11

Effect of ferrocene catalyst particle size on structural and morphological characteristics of carbon nanotubes grown by microwave oven

Natheer A. Algadri, Z. Hassan, K. Ibrahim, M. Bououdina

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 52· Issue 21
Publisher page

Abstract

The influence of catalyst particle size on the formation and diameter of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) is investigated. Ferrocene catalyst with an average diameter of 19.7, 21.4, 23.6 and 27.0 µm is used for the growth of CNTs by a cost-effective and facile method using microwave oven. Morphological observations by transmission electron microscopy and field emission scanning electron microscopy reveal consistently that smaller catalyst diameter generates CNTs with smaller diameter. Raman spectroscopy indicates that the full width at half maximum of G-, D- and 2D-bands decreases gradually with increasing CNTs diameter; meanwhile, G-band/D-band intensity ratio is found to be sensitive to crystal defects, showing a drop for CNTs diameter in the range 25–40 nm then followed by a slight increase for higher diameters. This may be associated with CNTs curvature and strain which developed along tube walls. X-ray diffraction analysis demonstrates an increase in d (002) interlayer spacing with decreasing CNTs diameter. Furthermore, CNTs diameter is found to be inversely proportional to (002) linewidth. Finally, the energy band gap estimated from UV–NIR–Vis measurements increases slightly with CNTs diameter, 5.69–5.84 eV.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Graphene research and applications · Fullerene Chemistry and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Köhler AR, Som C, Helland A, Gottschalk F (2008) Studying the potential release of carbon nanotubes throughout the application life cycle. J Clean Prod 16(8):927–93710.1016/j.jclepro.2007.04.007 ↗
2. Prasek J, Drbohlavova J, Chomoucka J, Hubalek J, Jasek O, Adam V, Kizek R (2011) Methods for carbon nanotubes synthesis—review. J Mater Chem 21(40):15872–1588410.1039/c1jm12254a ↗
3. Zhang X, Liu Z (2012) Recent advances in microwave initiated synthesis of nanocarbon materials. Nanoscale 4(3):707–71410.1039/C2NR11603K ↗
4. Xie H, Poyraz S, Thu M, Liu Y, Snyder EY, Smith JW, Zhang X (2014) Microwave-assisted fabrication of carbon nanotubes decorated polymeric nano-medical platforms for simultaneous drug delivery and magnetic resonance imaging. RSC Adv 4(11):5649–565210.1039/c3ra45913f ↗
5. Jones D, Lelyveld T, Mavrofidis S, Kingman S, Miles N (2002) Microwave heating applications in environmental engineering—a review. Resour Conserv Recycl 34(2):75–9010.1016/S0921-3449(01)00088-X ↗
6. Liu Z, Wang J, Kushvaha V, Poyraz S, Tippur H, Park S, Kim M, Liu Y, Bar J, Chen H (2011) Poptube approach for ultrafast carbon nanotube growth. Chem Commun 47(35):9912–991410.1039/c1cc13359d ↗
7. Poyraz S, Liu Z, Liu Y, Zhang X (2013) Devulcanization of scrap ground tire rubber and successive carbon nanotube growth by microwave irradiation. Curr Org Chem 17(20):2243–224810.2174/13852728113179990049 ↗
8. Poyraz S, Zhang L, Schroder A, Zhang X (2015) Ultrafast microwave welding/reinforcing approach at the interface of thermoplastic materials. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7(40):22469–2247710.1021/acsami.5b06484 ↗
9. Liu Z, Zhang L, Poyraz S, Smith J, Kushvaha V, Tippur H, Zhang X (2014) An ultrafast microwave approach towards multi-component and multi-dimensional nanomaterials. RSC Adv 4(18):9308–931310.1039/c3ra47086e ↗
10. Odom TW, Huang J-L, Kim P, Lieber CM (1998) Atomic structure and electronic properties of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Nature 391(6662):62–6410.1038/34145 ↗
11. Cabria I, Mintmire J, White C (2003) Metallic and semiconducting narrow carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev B 67(12):12140610.1103/PhysRevB.67.121406 ↗
12. Cheung CL, Kurtz A, Park H, Lieber CM (2002) Diameter-controlled synthesis of carbon nanotubes. J Phys Chem B 106(10):2429–243310.1021/jp0142278 ↗
13. Nasibulin AG, Pikhitsa PV, Jiang H, Kauppinen EI (2005) Correlation between catalyst particle and single-walled carbon nanotube diameters. Carbon 43(11):2251–225710.1016/j.carbon.2005.03.048 ↗
14. Ago H, Komatsu T, Ohshima S, Kuriki Y, Yumura M (2000) Dispersion of metal nanoparticles for aligned carbon nanotube arrays. Appl Phys Lett 77(1):79–8110.1063/1.126883 ↗
15. Schäffel F, Kramberger C, Rümmeli MH, Grimm D, Mohn E, Gemming T, Pichler T, Rellinghaus B, Büchner B, Schultz L (2007) Nanoengineered catalyst particles as a key for tailor-made carbon nanotubes. Chem Mater 19(20):5006–500910.1021/cm070950k ↗
16. Antunes E, Lobo A, Corat E, Trava-Airoldi V (2007) Influence of diameter in the Raman spectra of aligned multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Carbon 45(5):913–92110.1016/j.carbon.2007.01.003 ↗
17. Singh DK, Iyer P, Giri P (2010) Diameter dependence of interwall separation and strain in multiwalled carbon nanotubes probed by X-ray diffraction and Raman scattering studies. Diam Relat Mater 19(10):1281–128810.1016/j.diamond.2010.06.003 ↗
18. Mondal A, Agrawal D, Upadhyaya A (2008) Microwave heating of pure copper powder with different particle size and porosity. In: Global congress on microwave energy application, Japan10.1080/08327823.2008.11688599 ↗
19. Bai X, Li D, Wang Y, Liang J (2005) Effects of temperature and catalyst concentration on the growth of aligned carbon nanotubes. Tsinghua Sci Technol 10(6):729–73510.1016/S1007-0214(05)70142-5 ↗
20. Shamsudin M, Asli N, Abdullah S, Yahya S, Rusop M (2012) Effect of synthesis temperature on the growth iron-filled carbon nanotubes as evidenced by structural, micro-raman, and thermogravimetric analyses. Adv Condens Matter Phys 2012:1–710.1155/2012/420619 ↗
21. Tuinstra F, Koenig J (1970) Characterization of graphite fiber surfaces with Raman spectroscopy. J Compos Mater 4(4):492–49910.1177/002199837000400405 ↗
22. Ebbesen T, Takada T (1995) Topological and sp 3 defect structures in nanotubes. Carbon 33(7):973–97810.1016/0008-6223(95)00025-9 ↗
23. Reznik D, Olk C, Neumann D, Copley J (1995) X-ray powder diffraction from carbon nanotubes and nanoparticles. Phys Rev B 52(1):11610.1103/PhysRevB.52.116 ↗
24. Davis JA, Leckie JO (1978) Surface ionization and complexation at the oxide/water interface II. Surface properties of amorphous iron oxyhydroxide and adsorption of metal ions. J Colloid Interface Sci 67(1):90–10710.1016/0021-9797(78)90217-5 ↗
25. Liu M, Cowley JM (1994) Structures of carbon nanotubes studied by HRTEM and nanodiffraction. Ultramicroscopy 53(4):333–34210.1016/0304-3991(94)90046-9 ↗
26. Kiang C-H, Endo M, Ajayan P, Dresselhaus G, Dresselhaus M (1998) Size effects in carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev Lett 81(9):186910.1103/PhysRevLett.81.1869 ↗
27. Maciel IO, Anderson N, Pimenta MA, Hartschuh A, Qian H, Terrones M, Terrones H, Campos-Delgado J, Rao AM, Novotny L (2008) Electron and phonon renormalization near charged defects in carbon nanotubes. Nat Mater 7(11):878–88310.1038/nmat2296 ↗
28. Butler M (1977) Photoelectrolysis and physical properties of the semiconducting electrode WO2. J Appl Phys 48(5):1914–192010.1063/1.323948 ↗
29. Collins PG, Arnold MS, Avouris P (2001) Engineering carbon nanotubes and nanotube circuits using electrical breakdown. Science 292(5517):706–70910.1126/science.1058782 ↗
30. Avouris P (2002) Carbon nanotube electronics. Chem Phys 281(2):429–44510.1016/S0301-0104(02)00376-2 ↗
31. Guo G, Chu K, Wang D-S, Duan C-G (2004) Linear and nonlinear optical properties of carbon nanotubes from first-principles calculations. Phys Rev B 69(20):20541610.1103/PhysRevB.69.205416 ↗