journal article·2008-07

Electrical-thermal switching effect in high-density polyethylene/graphite nanosheets conducting composites

Lichun Zhou, Jinshan Lin, Hongfei Lin, Guohua Chen

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 43· Issue 14
Publisher page

Abstract

The nonlinear response in high-density polyethylene/graphite nanosheets conducting composites under increasing applied voltage is investigated. Under sufficient applied constant voltage, the resistance increases initially due to Joule heating effect and then eventually reaches a steady value with a characteristic thermal relaxation time τh, which decreases as the applied field increases. The switch value, namely the ratio of the resistance under steady condition to the resistance of sample in linear regime, gradually increases with the increasing applied field. The threshold voltage (V0) at which the resistance start to increase with time scales with linear regime resistance (R0) of the sample as $$ V0 \sim Rx0 ,$$ with the exponent x = 0.78 ± 0.05. All the curves of R/R0 vs. V/V0 collapse to a similar curve with the function R/R0 = 1 + α(V/V0)θ. The results reveal that the threshold voltage value decreases with increasing graphite nanosheets content in the composites.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Graphene research and applications · Thermal properties of materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Chakrabarti BK, Benguigui L (1997) Statistical physics of fracture and breakdown in disordered systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford10.1093/oso/9780198520566.001.0001 ↗
2. Heaney MB (1996) Appl Phys Lett 69:2602. doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.11771310.1063/1.117713 ↗
3. Oakes JA, Sandberg CL (1973) IEEE Trans Ind A l9:46210.1109/TIA.1973.349975 ↗
4. Doljack FA (1981) IEEE Trans Compon Hybrids Manuf Technol 4:372. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TCHMT.1981.113583810.1109/TCHMT.1981.1135838 ↗
5. Gefen Y, Shih WH, Laibowitz RB (1986) Phys Rev Lett 57:3097. doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.57.309710.1103/PhysRevLett.57.3097 ↗
6. Chakrabarty RK, Bardhan KK, Basu A (1991) Phys Rev B 44:6773. doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.44.677310.1103/PhysRevB.44.6773 ↗
7. Bardhan KK, Chakrabarty RK (1992) Phys Rev Lett 69:2559. doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.255910.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2559 ↗
8. Lu W, Wu DJ, Chen GH (2006) J Mater Sci 41:1785. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-3946-310.1007/s10853-006-3946-3 ↗
9. Lamaignere L, Carmona F, Sornette D (1996) Phys Rev Lett 77:2738. doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.273810.1103/PhysRevLett.77.2738 ↗
10. Mukherjee CD, Bardhan KK, Heaney MB (1999) Phys Rev Lett 83:1215. doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.121510.1103/PhysRevLett.83.1215 ↗
11. Duggal AR, Levinson LM (1997) Appl Phys Lett 71:1939. doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.11998710.1063/1.119987 ↗
12. Duggal AR, Sun FG (1998) J Appl Phys 83:2046. doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.36693710.1063/1.366937 ↗
13. Duggal AR, Sun FG (1998) J Appl Phys 84:5720. doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.36883710.1063/1.368837 ↗
14. Song YH, Yi XS, Pan Y (2000) J Mater Sci Lett 19:299. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:100670241154210.1023/A:1006702411542 ↗
15. Lu W, Lin HF, Chen GH (2007) J Polym Sci B Polym Phys 45:860. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/polb.2111110.1002/polb.21111 ↗
16. Heaney MB (1996) Appl Phys Lett 69:2602. doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.11771310.1063/1.117713 ↗
17. Chen GH, Weng WG, Wu DJ (2004) Carbon 42:753. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2003.12.07410.1016/j.carbon.2003.12.074 ↗
18. Stauffer D, Aharony A (1992) Introduction to percolation theory. Taylor and Francis, London
19. Mukherjee CD, Bardhan KK (2003) Phys Rev Lett 91:025702. doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.02570210.1103/PhysRevLett.91.025702 ↗
20. Havlin S, Ben-Avraham D (1987) Adv Phys 36:695. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0001873870010107210.1080/00018738700101072 ↗
21. Ghosh M, Chakrabarti BK, Majumdar KK, Chakrabarti RN (1990) Phys Rev B 41:731. doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.41.73110.1103/PhysRevB.41.731 ↗
22. Pennetta C, Reggiani L, Trwfan G (2002) Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 65:066119. doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.65.06611910.1103/PhysRevE.65.066119 ↗
23. Azulay D, Eylon M, Eshkenazi OD et al (2003) Phys Rev Lett 90:236601. doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.23660110.1103/PhysRevLett.90.236601 ↗