Young’s modulus of low-pressure cold sprayed composites: an analysis based on a minimum contact area model
Source abstract
Abstract
A theoretical and mathematical model based on minimum contact area (MCA) is developed to explain the bonding that takes place in the low-pressure gas dynamic spray (LPGDS) process. It is shown that by normalizing this MCA it is possible to compare the relative elastic modulus as a function of porosity. Theoretical predictions of relative elastic modulus are compared against results obtained through acoustic analysis and it is found that the correlation between is dependent on the porosity. For low porosity, the experimental and theoretical results differ substantially, while for higher porosity there seems to be good agreement between the two. To explain this behaviour it is theorized that full adiabatic shear bands (ASB) are created between only some of the particles. The higher porosity causes higher strain in the samples and thus more local deformation of the particles. This, in turn, causes more actual ASB formation. Since the theoretical model assumes full ASB formation, only the higher porosities cause enough strain to have a comparable relative elastic modulus. For the lower porosities, the local strain is less, and some of the bonds will not achieve full ASB formation. For these cases, the relative elastic modulus will be lower than that predicted.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High-Temperature Coating Behaviors · Flame retardant materials and properties · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Alkimov AP, Kosarev VE, Papyrin AN (1990) Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR 318:1062
2. Borchers C, Gartner F, Stoltenhoff, Kreye H (2003) J Appl Phys 12 93(2):1006410.1063/1.1573740 ↗
3. Borchers C, Gartner F, Stoltenhoff T, Kreye H (2005) Acta Mater 53:2991. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2005.02.04810.1016/j.actamat.2005.02.048 ↗
4. Meyers MA, Benson DJ, Olevsky EA (1999) Acta mater 47(7):208910.1016/S1359-6454(99)00083-X ↗
5. Prummer R (1987) Explosivverdichting Pulvriger Substanzen Grundlagen Verfahrenergebnisse (Springer, Berlin), in German10.1007/978-3-642-82903-1 ↗
6. Maev GrR, Leshchinsky Ev (2006) In: International thermal spray conference proceedings, Seattle, USA, 2006, CD Proceeding
7. Contreras A, Albiter A, Bedolla E, Perez R (2004) Adv Eng Mater 6(9):76710.1002/adem.200400102 ↗
8. CenterLine (Windsor) Limited, https://doi.org/www.cntrline.com , as on 07 June 2007
9. Tanga F, Meeks H, Spowart JE, Gnaeupel-Herold T, Prask H, Anderson IE (2004) Mater Sci Eng A 386:19410.1016/S0921-5093(04)00960-8 ↗
10. Kouzeli M, Mortensen A (2002) Acta Mater 50:39. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00327-510.1016/S1359-6454(01)00327-5 ↗
11. Orrhede M, Tolani R, Salama K (1996) Res Nondestr Eval 8:2310.1080/09349849608968103 ↗
12. Peng HX, Fan Z, Evans JRG (2001) Mater Sci Eng A 303:37. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01879-710.1016/S0921-5093(00)01879-7 ↗
13. Green DJ (1998) In: An introduction to the mechanical properties of ceramics. Cambridge University Press, 336 pp10.1017/CBO9780511623103 ↗
14. Mackenzie JK (1950) Proc Phys Soc Lond B63:2–1110.1088/0370-1301/63/1/302 ↗
15. Mizusaki J, Tsuchiya S, Waragai K, Tagawa H, Arai Yo, Kuwayama Y (1996) J Am Ceram Soc 79(1):10910.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb07887.x ↗
16. Maeva E, Aczel A, Leshchinsky Ev (2006) Adiabatic shear band formation in the gas dynamic spray process. J Mater Charact (submitted)
17. Mukhopadhyay AK, Phani KK (1998) J Mater Sci 33:69. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:100438532737010.1023/A:1004385327370 ↗
18. Mukhopadhyay AK, Phani KK (2000) J Am Ceram Soc 20:29. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-2219(99)00092-810.1016/S0955-2219(99)00092-8 ↗
19. Martin LP, Rosin M (1997) J Am Ceram Soc 80:83910.1111/j.1151-2916.1997.tb02912.x ↗
20. Papyrin AN, Kosarev VF, Klinkov SV, Alkhimov AP (2002) In: Proceedings of the international thermal spray conference, Dusseldorf, Germany, pp 380–38610.31399/asm.cp.itsc2002p0380 ↗
21. Van Steenkiste TH, Smith JR, Teets RE (2002) Surf Coat Technol 154:237. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0257-8972(02)00018-X10.1016/S0257-8972(02)00018-X ↗