AC conduction in amorphous thin films of SnO2
Source abstract
Abstract
Alternating current (a.c.) electrical properties of thermally evaporated amorphous thin films of SnO2 sandwiched between aluminium electrodes have been investigated for temperature during electrical measurements, film thickness, substrate temperature and post-deposition annealing. The a.c. conductivity, σ(ω), is found to vary with frequency according to the relation σ(ω) ∝ ωs, indicating a hopping process at low temperature. The conduction is explained by single polaron hopping process as proposed by Elliott. The increase in electrical conductivity with increase in temperature during electrical measurements is ascribed to the increase in the formation and high mobility of doubly ionized oxygen vacancies. The increase in conductivity with increase in film thickness is caused by the increase in interstitial tin, oxygen vacancies and defects produced due to deviation from stoichiometry. The increase in conductivity with increase in substrate and annealing temperature may be due to the formation of singly or doubly ionized oxygen vacancies and tin species of lower oxidation state. Measurements of capacitance C as a function of frequency and temperature show a decrease in C with increasing frequency and increase in C with increasing temperature. The increase in capacitance in the high-temperature low-frequency region is probably due to space charge polarization induced by the increasing number of free carriers as a result of increasing temperature.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: ZnO doping and properties · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Mott NF (1972) J Non-Cryst Solids 1:1. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3093(68)90002-110.1016/0022-3093(68)90002-1 ↗
2. Elliott SR (1978) Philos Mag B 37:553. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0141863780822644810.1080/01418637808226448 ↗
3. Austin IG, Mott NF (1969) Adv Phys 18:14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0001873690010126710.1080/00018736900101267 ↗
4. Pollak M (1971) Philos Mag 23:519. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1478643710821640210.1080/14786437108216402 ↗
5. Shimakawa K (1982) Philos Mag B 46:123. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1364281820824642910.1080/13642818208246429 ↗
6. Omura K, Veluchamy P, Tsuji M, Nishio T, Murojono D (1999) J Electrochem Soc 146:2113. doi:https://doi.org/10.1149/1.139190010.1149/1.1391900 ↗
7. Laverty SJ, Feng H, Maguire P (1997) J Electrochem Soc 144:2165. doi:https://doi.org/10.1149/1.183775810.1149/1.1837758 ↗
8. Tadeev AV, Delabouglise G, Labeau M (1998) Mater Sci Eng B 57:7610.1016/S0921-5107(98)00251-7 ↗
9. Ahmed SKF, Khan S, Ghosh PK, Mitra MK, Chattopadhyay KK (2006) J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 39:241. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-006-7808-x10.1007/s10971-006-7808-x ↗
10. Suh S, Zhang Z, Chu WK, Hoffman DM (1999) Thin Solid Films 345:240. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-6090(98)01421-710.1016/S0040-6090(98)01421-7 ↗
11. Cachet H, Gamard A, Campet G, Jousseaume B, Toupance T (2001) Thin Solid Films 388:4110.1016/S0040-6090(01)00838-0 ↗
12. Mohagheghi MMB, Saremi MS (2004) J Phys D Appl Phys 37:1248. doi:https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/37/8/01410.1088/0022-3727/37/8/014 ↗
13. Ji Z, He Z, Song Y, Liu K, Xiang Y (2004) Thin Solid Films 460:324. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2004.02.02110.1016/j.tsf.2004.02.021 ↗
14. Morais EA, Scalvi LVA, Geraldo V, Scalvi RMF, Ribeiro SJL, Santilli CV et al (2004) J Eur Ceram Soc 24:185710.1016/S0955-2219(03)00515-6 ↗
15. Kim H, Gilmore CM, Pique A, Horwitz JS, Mattoussi H, Murata H, Kafafi ZH, Chrisey DB (1999) J Appl Phys 86:6451. doi:https://doi.org/10.1063/1.37170810.1063/1.371708 ↗
16. Rockenberger J, Felde UZ, Tischer M, Troger L, Haase M, Weller H (2000) J Chem Phys 112:4296. doi:https://doi.org/10.1063/1.48097510.1063/1.480975 ↗
17. Banerjee AN, Maity R, Kundoo S, Chattopadhyay KK (2004) Phys Status Solidi (a) 201(5):983. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.20030676610.1002/pssa.200306766 ↗
18. Tahar RBH, Ban T, Ohya Y, Takahashi Y (1997) J Appl Phys 83(5):2631. doi:https://doi.org/10.1063/1.36702510.1063/1.367025 ↗
19. Karapatnitski IA, Mit KA, Mukhamedshina DM, Beisenkhanov NB (2002) Surf Coat Technol 151–152:76. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0257-8972(01)01611-510.1016/S0257-8972(01)01611-5 ↗
20. Lee JS, Choi SC (2005) J Eur Ceram Soc 25:3307. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2004.08.02210.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2004.08.022 ↗
21. Anwar M, Ghauri IM, Siddiqi SA (2005) Czech J Phys 55(8):1013. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10582-005-0100-410.1007/s10582-005-0100-4 ↗
22. Anthopoulos TD, Shafai TS (2003) J Appl Phys 94(4):2426. doi:https://doi.org/10.1063/1.159262610.1063/1.1592626 ↗
23. El-Nahass MM, El-Barry AMA, Rahman SA (2006) Phys Status Solidi (a) 203(2):317. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.20052130410.1002/pssa.200521304 ↗
24. Kitaneh RML, Saleh AM, Gould RD (2006) Cent Eur Sci J 4(1):87. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11534-005-0008-410.1007/s11534-005-0008-4 ↗
25. Mahmood FS, Gould RD (1994) Thin Solid Films 253:529. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-6090(94)90379-410.1016/0040-6090(94)90379-4 ↗
26. Ismail BB, Gould RD (1996) Proc SPIE 2780:46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1117/12.23820010.1117/12.238200 ↗
27. Goswami A, Goswami AP (1973) Thin Solid Films 16:175. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-6090(73)90166-110.1016/0040-6090(73)90166-1 ↗
28. Pollak M, Geballe TH (1961) Phys Rev 122:1742. doi:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.122.174210.1103/PhysRev.122.1742 ↗
29. Anwar M, Ghauri IM, Siddiqi SA (2007) Int J Mod Phys B 21(12):201710.1142/S0217979207037144 ↗
30. El-Wahabb EA (2005) Acta Phys Pol A 108(6):98510.12693/APhysPolA.108.985 ↗
31. Amma DSD, Vaidyan VK, Manoj PK (2005) Mater Chem Phys 93:19410.1016/j.matchemphys.2005.03.045 ↗
32. Jarzebski ZM (1982) Phys Status Solidi (a) 71:13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.221071010210.1002/pssa.2210710102 ↗