Fracture toughness analysis of anisotropic nickel-based single crystal superalloys at high temperature
Source abstract
Abstract
The purpose of this article is intended to study the fracture toughness of anisotropic nickel-based single crystal superalloys at elevated temperature by compact tension (CT) specimen in experiment method. The special attention is put on the orientation and temperature dependence of mechanical properties of single crystal as well as thickness effect of specimen. The experimental results show that crystallographic orientation and temperature have much complex effect on fracture toughness. The difference of fracture toughness of single crystal for different crystallographic orientation at low temperature is much greater than that at high temperature. The nickel-based single crystal specimen may merely become less anisotropic with the increase of the ambient temperature seems as more multi-slip action appears. The fracture mode of the specimens transfers from brittle to ductile as the temperature increases; also, the fracture toughness of single crystal for the same orientation becomes larger with the decreasing of the thickness of single crystal specimen.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High Temperature Alloys and Creep · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. Drugan WJ (2001) J Mech Phys Solids 49:2155. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5096(01)00041-210.1016/S0022-5096(01)00041-2 ↗
2. Ichitsubo T, Koumoto D, Hirao M et al (2003) Acta Mater 51:4863. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00326-410.1016/S1359-6454(03)00326-4 ↗
3. Prasad SC, Rao IJ, Rajagopal KR (2005) Acta Mater 53:669. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2004.10.02010.1016/j.actamat.2004.10.020 ↗
4. Nazmy M, Denk J, Baumann R et al (2003) Scripta Mater 48:519. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6462(02)00506-710.1016/S1359-6462(02)00506-7 ↗
5. Hederson MB, Martins JW (1996) Acta Mater 44(1):111. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/1359-6454(95)00147-910.1016/1359-6454(95)00147-9 ↗
6. Rice JR (1987) Mech Mater 6:317. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6636(87)90030-510.1016/0167-6636(87)90030-5 ↗
7. Rice JR, Nikolic R (1985) J Mech Phys Solids 33:595. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(85)90005-510.1016/0022-5096(85)90005-5 ↗
8. Kysar JW, Briant CL (2002) Acta Mater 50:2367. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00070-810.1016/S1359-6454(02)00070-8 ↗
9. Flouriot S, Forest S, Cailletaud G et al (2003) Int J Fract 124:43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FRAC.0000009300.70477.ba10.1023/B:FRAC.0000009300.70477.ba ↗
10. Flouriot S, Forest S, Remy L (2003) Comput Mater Sci 26:61. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-0256(02)00393-210.1016/S0927-0256(02)00393-2 ↗
11. Marchal N, Flouriot S, Forest S et al (2006) Comput Mater Sci 37:42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2005.12.01410.1016/j.commatsci.2005.12.014 ↗
12. Zhao LG, O’Dowd NP, Busso EP (2006) J Mech Phys Solids 54:288. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2005.09.00110.1016/j.jmps.2005.09.001 ↗
13. Yue ZF, Lu ZZ, Yang ZG (2003) J Aerosp Power 18(4):477
14. Yue ZF, Yang ZG, Lu ZZ (2002) Chin J Aeronaut 15(1):23910.1016/S1000-9361(11)60159-3 ↗
15. Yue ZF, Lu ZZ, Zhou L (1997) Acta Metall Sin 33(3):265
16. Tinga T (2006) Eng Fract Mech 73:1679. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.02.00210.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.02.002 ↗
17. Yue ZF, Yu QM, Wen ZX et al (2008) The design of structure and strength of nickel-based single crystal turbine blade. Science Press, Beijing
18. Wen ZX, Yue ZF (2007) Mater Sci Eng A 456:189. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.11.15210.1016/j.msea.2006.11.152 ↗