Prediction of strength of recrystallized siliconcarbide from pore size measurement Part II The reliability of the prediction
Source abstract
Abstract
The distribution of the pore sizes was measured for more than hundred specimens with an total area of 16000 square millimeters of recrystallized siliconcarbide specimens, from which the bending strength values were known. The parameters of the Weibull distribution of the strength were predicted from the distribution of the pore sizes. The reliability of the prediction was calculated by taking out arbitrary subsets of these specimens, corresponding to sub-areas of the total area, and investigating the statistical distribution in dependence on the size of the pores in these subsets. The so obtained mean and the variation coefficient were compared to the results from the mechanical bending tests.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. W. Weibull, J. Appl. Mech. 18 (1951) 293.10.1115/1.4010337 ↗
2. R. Danzer, J. Europ. Ceram. Soc. 10 (1992) 461.10.1016/0955-2219(92)90021-5 ↗
3. L. Sigl, Z. Metallkd. 83 (1992) 518.
4. A. S. Argon, Proc. Roy. Soc. A250 (1959) 422.
5. J. D. Poloniecki and T. R. Wilshaw,Nature 229 (1971) 226.
6. J. R. Matthews, F. A. Mclintock and W. J. Shack, J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 59 (1976) 304.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1976.tb10970.x ↗
7. A. G. Evans and R. I. Jones, ibid. 61 (1978) 156.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1978.tb09261.x ↗
8. P. D. Warren, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 15 (1995) 385.10.1016/0955-2219(95)00005-F ↗
9. J. Lamon, J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 71 (1988) 106.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1988.tb05825.x ↗
10. B. Schulstrich and M. FÄhrmann, J. Mat. Sci. Lett. 3 (1984) 597.10.1007/BF00719622 ↗
11. D. Kovar and M. J. Ready,J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 79 (1996) 305.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb08121.x ↗
12. T. Hoshide and M. Masuda, Mater. Sci. Res. Int. 1 (1995) 108.
13. C. Luen-yuan and D. K. Shetty, J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 75 (1992) 2116.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1992.tb04473.x ↗
14. Y. Zhang, N. Uchida, K. Uematsu, T. Hotta, K. Nakahira and M. Naito, Key Eng. Mat. 159-160 (1999) 269.10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.159-160.269 ↗
15. H. Peterlik, N. Orlovskaja, W. Steinkellner and K. Kromp, J. Mater. Sci. 35 (2000) 699.10.1023/A:1004757317724 ↗
16. D. R. Thoman, L. J. Bain and C. E. Antle, Technometrics 11 (1969) 445.10.1080/00401706.1969.10490706 ↗
17. K. Trustrum and A. DE S. Jayatilaka, J. Mater. Sci. 14 (1979) 1080.10.1007/BF00561290 ↗
18. J. Ritter, N. Bandyopadhyay and K. Jakus, Amer. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 60 (1981) 798.
19. B. Bergman, J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 3 (1984) 689.10.1007/BF00719924 ↗
20. B. Faucher and W. R. Tyson, ibid. 7 (1988) 199.10.1007/BF00722337 ↗
21. A. Khalili and K. Kromp, J. Mater. Sci. 26 (1991) 6741.10.1007/BF02402669 ↗
22. J. Gong and Y. Li, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 82 (1999) 449.10.1111/j.1551-2916.1999.tb20084.x ↗
23. H. Peterlik, J. Mater. Sci. 30 (1995) 1972.10.1007/BF00353020 ↗
24. N. Orlovskaja, H. Peterlik, M. Marczewski, K. Kromp, ibid. 32 (1997) 1903.10.1023/A:1018521310570 ↗
25. J. Kriegesmann, M. Kraus, A. Gros, CFI (Ceram. For. Int.)-Ber. DKG 75 (1998) 83.
26. R. J. Primas and R. Gstrein, Fatigue and Fract. of Eng. Mat. Struct. 20 (1997) 513.10.1111/j.1460-2695.1997.tb00284.x ↗
27. D. Sonderman, K. Jakus, J. E. Ritter Jr., S. Yuhaski Jr. and T. H. Service, J. Mater. Sci. 20 (1985) 207.10.1007/BF00555914 ↗
28. M. L. Gambone, Scripta Mat. 34 (1996) 507.10.1016/S0956-716X(95)00546-8 ↗
29. S. H. Own, R. V. Subramanian and C. S. Saunders, J. Mater. Sci. 21 (1986) 3912.10.1007/BF02431629 ↗
30. E. Bourgain and J. J. Masson, Comp. Sci. Techn. 43 (1992) 221.10.1016/0266-3538(92)90092-H ↗
31. T. Jung, R. V. Subramanian and V. S. Manoranjan, J. Mater. Sci. 28 (1993) 4489.10.1007/BF01154961 ↗