journal article·2007-01-17

Fracture toughness of glass microsphere-filled polypropylene and polypropylene/poly (ethylene terephthalate-co-isophthalate) blend-matrix composites

D. Arencón, J. I. Velasco, V. Realinho, M. Sánchez-Soto, A. Gordillo

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 42· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

The fracture behaviour of glass microsphere-filled polypropylene/poly(ethylene terephthalate-co-isophthalate) blend-matrix composites was investigated in comparison with that of the glass microsphere-filled PP composites. Depending on the deformability displayed by the composite, it was carried out through the linear-elastic fracture mechanics or by applying the J-integral concept. The matrix ductility was regulated in the composite through the glass bead surface treatment applied with different silane-coupling agents, as well as with the addition of maleated PP as polymer compatibilizer. Whereas all the composites failed in a brittle manner at moderate impact speed, quasi-brittle fracture behaviour was only observed at low strain rate in composites having high and medium interfacial adhesion level. Results showed that composites containing both aminosilane-treated glass microspheres and maleated PP showed the highest values of fracture toughness. In composites with low adhesion level between matrix and glass beads, the critical J-integral value diminished due to the presence of PET.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer crystallization and properties · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Karger-Kocsis J (1995) In: Karger-Kocsis J (ed) Polypropylene: structure, blends and composites. Chapman & Hall, London
2. Velasco JI, De Saja JA, Martínez AB (1997) Fatigue Frac Eng Mater Struct 20:65910.1111/j.1460-2695.1997.tb00299.x ↗
3. Velasco JI, Morhain C, Arencón D, Santana OO, Maspoch MLL (1998) Polym Bull 41:61510.1007/s002890050409 ↗
4. Velasco JI, Morhain C, Maspoch MLI, Santana OO (1998) In: Brown MW, de los Rios ER, Miller KJ (eds) ECF 12 – Fracture from Defects. EMAS Publishing, Wentworth
5. Morhain C, Velasco JI (2002) J Mater Sci 37(8):163510.1023/A:1014944729912 ↗
6. Labour T, Vigier G, Seguela R, Gauthier C, Orange G, Bomal Y (2002) J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys 40(1):3110.1002/polb.10068 ↗
7. Szabo JS, Czigany T (2003) Polym Testing 22(6):71110.1016/S0142-9418(03)00005-9 ↗
8. Dasari A, Misra RDK (2004) Acta Mater 52(6):168310.1016/j.actamat.2003.12.013 ↗
9. Gong G, Xie BH, Yang W, Li ZM, Zhang WQ, Yang MB (2005) Polym Testing 24(4):41010.1016/j.polymertesting.2005.02.004 ↗
10. Asp LE, Sjöngren BA, Berglund LA (1997) Polym Comp 18:910.1002/pc.10256 ↗
11. Tsui CP, Tang CY, Lee TC (2002) In: Ligtning Source Inc. (ed) Fracture mechanics testing methods for polymers adhesives and composites. Elsevier Science, Kidlington, pp 395–406
12. Sjöngren BA, Berglund LA (1997) Polym Comp 18:110.1002/pc.10255 ↗
13. Liang JZ, Li RKY (1999) Polymer 40:319110.1016/S0032-3861(98)00532-1 ↗
14. Davies LC, Sothern GR, Hodd KA (1988) Plastics Rubb Process Appl 5:9
15. Stamhuis JE (1988) Polym Comp 9:7210.1002/pc.750090110 ↗
16. Xavier XF, Schultz JM, Friedrich K (1990) J Mater Sci 25:241110.1007/BF00638035 ↗
17. Felix JM, Gatenholm P (1991) J Appl Polym Sci 50:69910.1002/app.1993.070500416 ↗
18. Bikiaris D, Matzinos P, Larena A, Flaris V, Panayiotou CJ (2001) J Appl Polym Sci 81:70110.1002/app.1487 ↗
19. García-Martínez JM, Laguna O, Areso S, Collar EP (2001) J Appl Polym Sci 81:62510.1002/app.1478 ↗
20. Ulrich M, Caze C, Laroche P (1998) J Appl Polym Sci 67:20110.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19980110)67:2<201::AID-APP2>3.0.CO;2-Y ↗
21. Noh CH, Yoon BS, Suh MH, Lee SH (2001) Polymer 42:269510.1016/S0032-3861(00)00633-9 ↗
22. Velasco JI, Ardanuy M, Miralles L, Ortiz S, Maspoch MLI, Sánchez-Soto M, Santana O (2005) Macromol Symp 221:6310.1002/masy.200550307 ↗
23. Arencon D, Maspoch MLI, Velasco JI (2003) Macromol Symp 194:22510.1002/masy.200390087 ↗
24. Arencón D, Velasco JI, Rodríguez-Pérez MA, De Saja JA (2004) J Appl Polym Sci 94(4):184110.1002/app.21146 ↗
25. Arencón D, Velasco JI, Ardanuy M, Martinez AB J Mater Sci (in progress)
26. ESIS Technical Committee 4 (1990) A linear-elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) standard for determining Kc and Gc for plastics. Testing protocol. European Structural Integrity Society, March 1990
27. ASTM Standard E813-81 (1981) Annual book of ASTM Standards. Part 10. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, p 810
28. Irwin GR (1960) In Proceedings of the Seventh Sagamore Ordnance Materials Conference, vol. IV. Syracuse University, New York, pp 63–78
29. Irwin GR (1964) Appl Mater Res 3:65
30. ESIS Technical Committee 4 (2000) A testing protocol for conducting J–R curve tests on plastics. European Structural Integrity Society, March 2000
31. Casiragui T, Castiglioni G, Ronchetti T (1988) J Mater Sci 23:45910.1007/BF01174670 ↗
32. Maspoch MLL, Ferrer-Balas D, Gordillo A, Santana OO (1999) J Appl Polym Sci 73:17710.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990711)73:2<177::AID-APP5>3.0.CO;2-# ↗
33. Paris PC, Tada H, Zahoor A, Ernst H (1979) In: Elastic-Plastic Fracture, ASTM Special Technical Publication No. 668, American Society of Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 5–36
34. Bataille P, Boisse S, Schreiber HP (1987) Polym Eng Sci 27:62210.1002/pen.760270904 ↗