Effect of green density and electric field direction on densification of YAG nano-powders by spark plasma sintering
Source abstract
Abstract
Nanocrystalline YAG powders with 34-nm average particle size were cold isostatic pressed (CIP) between 10 and 240 MPa to form compacts with 43–52% green densities. Spark plasma sintering (SPS) was performed for 5 min at 1,400 °C and 90 MPa using clusters of three disc specimens packed in series with the electric field direction. The pore size and its volume fraction decreased with the increase in the CIP pressure. The final density varied between 86% and 99% and strongly depended on the specimen location in the series. Density, grain size, and pore size analyses showed that the specimens facing the electric current experienced higher SPS temperatures. Possible temperature gradient due to axial displacement of non-conducting oxide was too low to explain the observed effect. Effect of the green density on the final density was marginal.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Luminescence Properties of Advanced Materials · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Microwave Dielectric Ceramics Synthesis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Jiang D, Hulbert DM, Kuntz JD, Anselmi-Tamburini U, Mukherjee AK (2007) Mater Sci Eng A 463:8910.1016/j.msea.2006.07.163 ↗
2. Nygren M, Shen Z (2003) Solid State Sci 5:12510.1016/S1293-2558(02)00086-9 ↗
3. Dobedoe RS, West GD, Lewis MH (2003) Bull ECerS 1:19
4. Tokita M (2006) Am Ceram Soc Bull 85:32
5. Omori M (2000) Mater Sci Eng A 287:18310.1016/S0921-5093(00)00773-5 ↗
6. Liu W, Naka M (2003) Scripta Mater 48:122510.1016/S1359-6462(03)00074-5 ↗
7. Vasylkiv O, Borodianska H, Sakka Y (2008) J Eur Ceram Soc 28:91910.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2007.09.029 ↗
8. Munir ZA, Anselmi-Tamburini U, Ohyanagi M (2007) J Mater Sci 41:763. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-6555-210.1007/s10853-006-6555-2 ↗
9. Chaim R, Shen Z, Nygren M (2004) J Mater Res 19:252710.1557/JMR.2004.0334 ↗
10. Anselmi-Tamburini U, Woolman JN, Munir ZA (2007) Adv Func Mater 17:326710.1002/adfm.200600959 ↗
11. Bernard-Granger G, Guizard C (2007) Acta Mater 55:349310.1016/j.actamat.2007.01.048 ↗
12. Trunec M, Maca K, Shen Z (2008) Scripta Mater 59:2310.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.02.015 ↗
13. Brook RJ (1969) J Am Ceram Soc 52:5610.1111/j.1151-2916.1969.tb12664.x ↗
14. Wakai F, Akatsu T, Shinoda Y (2006) Acta Mater 54:79310.1016/j.actamat.2005.09.039 ↗
15. Chaim R, Levin M, Shlayer A, Estournes C (2008) Adv Appl Ceramics 107:15910.1179/174367508X297812 ↗
16. Chaim R, Marder-Jaeckel R, Shen JZ (2006) Mater Sci Eng A 429:7410.1016/j.msea.2006.04.072 ↗
17. Chaim R, Shen Z (2008) J Mater Sci 43:5023. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-008-2742-710.1007/s10853-008-2742-7 ↗
18. Yucheng W, Zhengyi F (2002) Mater Sci Eng B 90:3410.1016/S0921-5107(01)00780-2 ↗
19. Zavaliangos A, Zhang J, Krammer M, Groza JR (2004) Mater Sci Eng A 379:21810.1016/j.msea.2004.01.052 ↗
20. Anselmi-Tamburini U, Gennari S, Garay JE, Munir ZA (2005) Mater Sci Eng A 394:13910.1016/j.msea.2004.11.019 ↗
21. Vanmeensel K, Laptev A, Hennicke J, Vleugels J, Van der Biest O (2005) Acta Mater 53:437910.1016/j.actamat.2005.05.042 ↗
22. Wang X, Casolco SR, Xu G, Garay JE (2007) Acta Mater 55:361110.1016/j.actamat.2007.02.022 ↗
23. Matsugi K, Kuramoto H, Hatayama T, Yanagisawa O (2004) J Mater Proc Tech 146:27410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2003.11.002 ↗
24. Chaim R (2006) J Mater Sci 41:7862. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0605-710.1007/s10853-006-0605-7 ↗
25. Chaim R (2007) Mater Sci Eng A 443:2510.1016/j.msea.2006.07.092 ↗
26. DiMilia RA, Reed JS (1983) J Am Ceram Soc 66:66710.1111/j.1151-2916.1983.tb10619.x ↗
27. Reed JS (1995) Principles of ceramics processing, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
28. Chaim R, Kalina M, Shen JZ (2007) J Eur Ceram Soc 27:333110.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2007.02.193 ↗