Electromigration-enhanced intermetallic growth and phase evolution in Cu/Sn–58Bi/Cu solder joints
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents some experimental observations relative to the influence of elevated current densities on the intermetallic growth and phase evolution in Cu/Sn–58Bi/Cu solder joints. Three samples were stressed with different current densities of 104, 1.2 × 104, and 1.4 × 104 A/cm2, respectively, for 80 h. The abnormal polarity effect of electromigration (EM) on chemical reactions at the cathode and the anode was investigated as well as the effect of EM on phase segregation in the two-phase eutectic microstructure. Results indicate that electric current enhances the growth of IMC layer at the cathode and retards it at the anode due to the Bi accumulation acting as a barrier layer with current density of 104 A/cm2. However, when current density increases, the electrical force dissolves the IMC at the cathode into the solder. More and more intermetallic precipitates formed due to the dissolution of Cu into the solder at the cathode side with increased current densities, leading to a very different morphology at the anode and the cathode interfaces, one being planar and the other being very irregular. It can be concluded that the chemical force and the electrical force are the main driving forces contributing to the IMC growth at both interfaces.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies · 3D IC and TSV technologies · Copper Interconnects and Reliability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. Nah JW, Paik KW, Suh JO, Tu KN (2003) J Appl Phys 94:756010.1063/1.1628388 ↗
2. Gan H, Tu KN (2005) J Appl Phys 97:063514-1
3. Lin YH, Hu YC, Tsai CM, Kao CR, Tu KN (2005) Acta Mater 53:202910.1016/j.actamat.2005.01.014 ↗
4. Chen S-W, Chen C-M, Liu W-C (1998) J Electron Mater 27(11):119310.1007/s11664-998-0068-5 ↗
5. Huynh QT, Liu CY, Chen C, Tu KN (2001) J Appl Phys 89(8):433210.1063/1.1357459 ↗
6. Ou S, Tu KN (2005) In: Proceedings of the 55th ECTC, vol 2, pp 1407–1415
7. Liu CY, Chen C, Liao CN, Tu KN (1999) Appl Phys Lett 75(1):5810.1063/1.124276 ↗
8. Chen C-M, Huang C-C (2007) J Alloy Compd 461:23510.1016/j.jallcom.2007.07.059 ↗
9. Chen C-M, Huang C-C (2008) J Mater Res 23(4):105110.1557/jmr.2008.0128 ↗
10. Chen C-M, Huang C-C, Liao C-N et al (2007) J Electron Mater 36(7):76010.1007/s11664-007-0150-4 ↗
11. Chen ZG (2002) J Electron Mater 31(10):112210.1007/s11664-002-0052-4 ↗
12. Chen ZG (2003). PhD Thesis, Beijing University of Technology
13. Xu GC, He HW, Guo F (2009) J Electron Mater 38:27310.1007/s11664-008-0562-9 ↗
14. He HW, Xu GC, Hao H, Guo F (2007) ICEPT. Shanghai, China, p 225
15. Guo F, Xu GC, He HW (2009) J Mater Sci 44(20):5595. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-009-3787-y10.1007/s10853-009-3787-y ↗
16. Ma HT (2009) J Mater Sci 44(14):3841. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-009-3521-910.1007/s10853-009-3521-9 ↗
17. Cheng F, Nishikawa H, Takemoto T (2008) J Mater Sci 43(10):3643. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-008-2580-710.1007/s10853-008-2580-7 ↗
18. Chao BH-L, Zhang X, Chae S-H, Ho PS (2009) Microelectron Reliab 49:25310.1016/j.microrel.2009.01.006 ↗