Interfacially engineered liquid-phase-sintered Cu–In composite solders for thermal interface material applications
Source abstract
Abstract
Cu particle-containing In-matrix composites for thermal interface material (TIM) applications were prepared via liquid phase sintering, following chemical modification of the Cu–In interfaces. The optimized composite TIM possessed 1.5 times the thermal conductivity, and twice the yield strength, of pure In. Joints of the composite TIM between pairs of cylindrical Cu rods were used to measure shear behavior and thermal resistance as functions of three parameters: (i) joint thickness, (ii) thermal excursion history, and (iii) type of interfacial layers between Cu and In. The composite joints showed good shear compliance, with a shear yield strength of 2.7 MPa, as well as substantially lower joint thermal resistance (0.021 cm2 K W−1) than pure In joints, which are commercially used in high-end TIM applications. The thermal resistance of the joints was found to be a sensitive function of the interfacial contact resistance between the Cu particles and In within the TIM, as well as between the TIM and the Cu substrates. The TIM–substrate interfaces, in particular, play an increasingly important role as the joint becomes thinner, limiting the joint thermal resistance. To reduce the interfacial contact resistance, a diffusion barrier of 1–2-nm-thick Al2O3 was applied by atomic layer deposition on both the Cu particles and the Cu substrates, followed by a 20-nm-thick Au layer, which served as a wetting enhancer. The engineered interfaces also improved the stability of the composite TIM joints under aging conditions.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Thermal properties of materials · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. J Liu, P Rottmann, S Dutta, et al. (2009) Next generation materials for thermal interface and high density energy storage applications via liquid phase sintering. In: Proceedings of the 12th Electronics Packaging Technology Conference (EPTC), p 50610.1109/EPTC.2009.5416494 ↗
2. P Kumar, I Dutta, R Raj, M Renavikar, W V (2008) Novel Liquid Phase Sintered Solders with Indium as Minority Phase for Next Generation Thermal Interface Materials Applications. In: Procedding of Conference on Thermal Issues in Emerging Technologies (ThETA 2), p 33910.1109/THETA.2008.5167182 ↗
3. Dutta I, Raj R, Kumar P et al (2009) Liquid phase sintered solders with indium as minority phase for next generation thermal interface material applications. J Electron Mater 38:273510.1007/s11664-009-0898-9 ↗
4. Every AG, Tzou Y, Hasselman DPH, Raj R (1992) The effect of particle size on the thermal conductivity of ZnS/diamond composites. Acta Metall Mater 40:12310.1016/0956-7151(92)90205-S ↗
5. Liu J, Kumar P, Dutta I et al (2011) Liquid phase sintered Cu–In composite solders for thermal interface material and interconnect applications. J Mater Sci 46:7012. doi: 10.1007/s10853-011-5670-x10.1007/s10853-011-5670-x ↗
6. Narciso J, García-Cordovilla C, Louis E (1992) Reactivity of thermally oxidized and unoxidized SiC particulates with aluminium-silicon alloys. Mater Sci Eng B 15:14810.1016/0921-5107(92)90047-D ↗
7. Rajan TPD, Pillai RM, Pai BC (1998) Reinforcement coatings and interfaces in aluminium metal matrix composites. J Mater Sci 33:349110.1023/A:1004674822751 ↗
8. Suery M, Lesperance G, Hong BD, Thanh LN, Bordeaux F (1993) Development of particulate treatments and coatings to reduce SiC degradation by liquid aluminum. J Mater Eng Perform 2:36510.1007/BF02648824 ↗
9. Lloyd DJ (1994) Particle reinforced aluminium and magnesium matrix composites. Int Mater Rev 39:110.1179/imr.1994.39.1.1 ↗
10. Elers KE, Saanila V, Soininen PJ et al (2002) Diffusion barrier deposition on a copper surface by atomic layer deposition. Chem Vap Depos 8:14910.1002/1521-3862(20020704)8:4<149::AID-CVDE149>3.0.CO;2-F ↗
11. Shen S, Liu Y, Gordon RG, Brillson LJ (2011) Impact of ultrathin Al2O3 diffusion barriers on defects in high-k LaLuO3 on Si. Appl Phys Lett 98(17):17290210.1063/1.3583462 ↗
12. Kim DG, Yoon JW, Lee CY, Jung SB (2003) Reaction diffusion and formation of Cu11In9 and In27Ni10 phases in the couple of indium-substrates. Mater Trans 44:7210.2320/matertrans.44.72 ↗
13. Sankarana K, Gouxa L, Climaa S et al (2012) Modeling of copper diffusion in amorphous aluminum oxide in CBRAM memory stack. ECS Trans 45:31710.1149/1.3700896 ↗
14. Wank JR, George SM, Weimer AW (2004) Coating fine nickel particles with Al2O3 utilizing an atomic layer deposition-fluidized bed reactor (ALD–FBR). J Am Ceram Soc 87:76210.1111/j.1551-2916.2004.00762.x ↗
15. Chang ML, Cheng TC, Lin MC, Lin HC, Chen MJ (2012) Improvement of oxidation resistance of copper by atomic layer deposition. Appl Surf Sci 258:1012810.1016/j.apsusc.2012.06.090 ↗
16. Pan D, Marks RA, Dutta I, Mahajan R, Jadhav SG (2004) Miniaturized impression creep testing of ball grid array solder balls attached to microelectronic packaging substrates. Rev Sci Instrum 75:524410.1063/1.1821626 ↗
17. Oberdorfer C, Schmitz G (2011) On the field evaporation behavior of dielectric materials in three-dimensional atom probe: a numeric simulation. Microsc Microanal 17:1510.1017/S1431927610093888 ↗
18. JR Culham, P Teertstra, I Savija, MM Yovanovich (2002) The eighth intersociety conference on thermal and thermomechanical phenomena in electronic systems, ITHERM 2002, San Diego, CA, USA
19. Z Kai, Z Xinfeng, C Zhibo, et al. (2013) 14th international conference on thermal, mechanical and multi-physics simulation and experiments in microelectronics and microsystems (EuroSimE)
20. P Teertstra (2007) ASME 2007 InterPACK conference, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
21. J Liu (2013) Materials Science and Engineering ProgramWashington State University
22. Kline SJ, McClintock FA (1953) Describing Uncertainties in Single-Sample Experiments. Mechanical Engineering 75:3
23. Thompson DR, Rao SR, Cola BA (2013) A stepped-bar apparatus for thermal resistance measurements. J Electron Packag 135:04100210.1115/1.4025116 ↗
24. Liu YM, Chuang TH (2000) Interfacial reactions between liquid indium and Au-deposited substrates. J Electron Mater 29:40510.1007/s11664-000-0152-y ↗
25. Yu CL, Wang SS, Chuang TH (2002) Intermetallic compounds formed at the interface between liquid indium and copper substrates. J Electron Mater 31:48810.1007/s11664-002-0104-9 ↗
26. Material Properties Data: Alumina (Aluminum Oxide), http://www.makeitfrom.com/material-data/?for=Alumina-Aluminum-Oxide-Al2O3
27. Cahill DG, Goodson KE, Majumdar A (2002) Thermometry and thermal transport in micro/nanoscale solid-state devices and structures. J Heat Trans-T Asme 124:22310.1115/1.1454111 ↗
28. Kim EK, Kwun SI, Lee SM, Seo H, Yoon JG (2000) Thermal boundary resistance at Ge2Sb2Te5/ZnS : SiO2 interface. Appl Phys Lett 76:386410.1063/1.126852 ↗
29. Lee SM, Cahill DG (1997) Heat transport in thin dielectric films. J Appl Phys 81:259010.1063/1.363923 ↗
30. Yang H-S, Bai GR, Thompson LJ, Eastman JA (2002) Interfacial thermal resistance in nanocrystalline yttria-stabilized zirconia. Acta Mater 50:230910.1016/S1359-6454(02)00057-5 ↗
31. Hartman TE, Chivian JS (1964) Electron tunneling through thin aluminum oxide films. Phys Rev 134:A109410.1103/PhysRev.134.A1094 ↗
32. K Vijay (2011) 18th European microelectronics and packaging conference (EMPC), Brighton, UK
33. Kumar P, Awasthi S (2014) Mechanical and thermal modeling of In-Cu composites for thermal interface materials applications. J Compos Mater 48:1391–139810.1177/0021998313486502 ↗