Magnetic properties of mechanically activated SmMnO3 powders
Source abstract
Abstract
Magnetic properties of the initial (pre-milling) and mechanically activated SmMnO3 polycrystalline powders were studied. Magnetization measurements were carried out in the temperature range of T = 4–300 K and the magnetic fields up to ±20 kOe. The powders were subjected to both high-energy and low-energy ball milling. The samples studied were analyzed by X-ray diffraction method and X-ray photon-emission spectroscopy. It was found that all the mechanically activated powders SmMnO3 have significantly different magnetic characteristics (transition temperatures, coercive forces, remanent magnetizations) in comparison with initial samarium manganite. The inversion of field cooled (FC) and zero-field cooled magnetizations was observed for the initial sample only. Mechanically activated samples demonstrate positive FC magnetizations in the whole measured temperature range. It is established that the magnetic properties of the samples are strongly dependent on the mode of mechanical activation. Much noticeably, modifications in magnetic characteristics of powder studied were obtained in the case of low-energy mechanical treatment.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials · Multiferroics and related materials · Magnetic Properties of Alloys
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Pyatakov AP, Zvezdin AK (2012) Phys Usp 55:55710.3367/UFNe.0182.201206b.0593 ↗
2. Levasseur B, Kaliaguine S (2008) J Solid State Chem 181:295310.1016/j.jssc.2008.07.029 ↗
3. Mukhin AA, Ivanov VYu et al (2004) J Magn Magn Mater 272–276:9610.1016/j.jmmm.2003.11.041 ↗
4. Ivanov VYu, Mukhin AA et al (2003) Phys Status Solid 236(2):44510.1002/pssb.200301700 ↗
5. Jung J-S, Iyama A et al (2010) Phys Rev B 82:21240310.1103/PhysRevB.82.212403 ↗
6. Oleaga A, Salazar A et al (2012) Phys Rev B 85:18442510.1103/PhysRevB.85.184425 ↗
7. Cheng J-G, Zhou J-S, Goodenough JB et al (2011) Phys Rev B 84:10441510.1103/PhysRevB.84.104415 ↗
8. Jung J-S, Iyama A et al (2012) Phys Rev B 85:17441410.1103/PhysRevB.85.174414 ↗
9. Iyama A, Jung J-S et al (2012) J Phys Soc Jpn 81:01370310.1143/JPSJ.81.013703 ↗
10. Shetkar RG, Salker AV (2010) J Mater Sci Technol 26(12):109810.1016/S1005-0302(11)60007-8 ↗
11. Lalitha G, Venugopal Reddy P (2008) J Magn Magn Mater 320:75410.1016/j.jmmm.2007.08.014 ↗
12. Chen Y, Yuan H et al (2007) J Cryst Growth 305:24210.1016/j.jcrysgro.2007.03.052 ↗
13. da Silva C, Silva R (2012) J Supercond Novel Magn 26(7):249710.1007/s10948-012-1727-6 ↗
14. Pavan Kumar N, Lalitha G, Venugopal Reddy P (2011) Phys Scripta 83:04570110.1088/0031-8949/83/04/045701 ↗
15. Néel L (1948) Ann Phys (Paris) 3:137
16. Kageyamaa H, Khomskii DI et al (2003) J Magn Magn Mater 262:44510.1016/S0304-8853(03)00076-3 ↗
17. Prudnikov VN, Kazakov AP, Titov IS et al (2011) Phys Solid State 53(3):46010.1134/S1063783411030255 ↗
18. Kodama RH, Berkovitz AE, McNiff EJ, Foner S Jr (1996) Phys Rev Lett 77:39410.1103/PhysRevLett.77.394 ↗
19. Kodama RH, Makhlouf SA, Berkovitz AE (1997) Phys Rev Lett 79:139310.1103/PhysRevLett.79.1393 ↗
20. Kodama RH, Berkovitz AE (1999) Phys Rev B 59:632110.1103/PhysRevB.59.6321 ↗