Atomic structure of AlN/Al2O3 interfaces fabricated by pulsed-laser deposition
Source abstract
Abstract
The atomic structure of AlN/Al2O3 interface fabricated by pulsed laser deposition is characterized by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) combined with systematic multi-slice HRTEM image simulations. It is found that the AlN film deposited on a (0001) Al2O3 substrate grows epitaxially with the orientation relationship of (0001)AlN//(0001) Al2O3 and [ $$\bar 1100$$ ]AlN//[ $$11\bar 20$$ ]Al2O3, with an atomically sharp interface. The observed interface showed best correspondence with the rigid structural model that AlN is terminated by Al at the interface, while the Al2O3 substrate is terminated by O. Detailed structural analysis indicates that Al sites at the interface are coordinated by both oxygen and nitrogen in this model, with similar coordination environment in AlN. This favored coordination state at the interface may stabilize the AlN/Al2O3 interface.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials · Semiconductor materials and devices · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. S. Nakamura, M. Senoh and T. Mukai, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 32 (1993) L8.10.1143/JJAP.32.L8 ↗
2. S. Nakamura, M. Senoh, S. Nagahama, N. Iwasa, T. Yamada, T. Matsushita, H. Kiyoku and Y. Sugimoto, ibid. 35 (1996) L74.10.1143/JJAP.35.L74 ↗
3. H. Amano, T. Asahi and I. Akasaki, ibid. Part 2, 29 (1990) L205.10.1143/JJAP.29.L205 ↗
4. S. Yoshida, S. Misawa and S. Gonda, Appl. Phys. Lett. 42 (1983) 427.10.1063/1.93952 ↗
5. S. C. Jain, M. Willander, J. Narayan and R. Van Overstraeten, J. Appl. Phys. 87 (2000) 965.10.1063/1.371971 ↗
6. S. D. Lester, F. A. Ponce, M. G. Craford and D. A. Steigerwald, Appl. Phys. Lett. 66 (1995) 1249.10.1063/1.113252 ↗
7. P. Ruterana, V. Potin, B. Barbaray and G. Nouet, Phil. Mag. A80 (2000) 937.10.1080/01418610008212091 ↗
8. Th. Kehagias, Ph. Komninou, G. Nouet, P. Ruterana and Th. Karakostas, Phys. Rev. B64 (2001) 195329.10.1103/PhysRevB.64.195329 ↗
9. J. R. Heffelfinger, D. L. Medlin and K. F. Mccarty, J. Appl. Phys. 85 (1999) 466.10.1063/1.369409 ↗
10. R. Kilaas, Proc., of the 49th Electron Microscopy Society of America Meeting, edited by G. W. Bailey (San Francisco Press, 1991) p. 258.10.1017/S0424820100086957 ↗
11. J. M. Cowley and A. F. Moodie, Acta Crystallogr. 10 (1957) 609.10.1107/S0365110X57002194 ↗
12. Y. Ikuhara and P. Pirouz, Mater. Sci. Forum. Part I 207–209, (1996) 121.10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.207-209.121 ↗
13. T. Sasaki, private communication.
14. K. M. Taylor and C. Lenie, J. Electrochem. Soc. 107 (1960) 308.10.1149/1.2427686 ↗
15. L. Pauling and S. B. Hendricks, Phys. Rev. 122 (1925) 757.
16. Y. Ikuhara and P. Pirouz, Micros. Res. Techn. 40 (1998) 206.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0029(19980201)40:3<206::AID-JEMT4>3.0.CO;2-S ↗
17. R. D. Shannon, Acta Crystallogr. A32 (1976) 751.10.1107/S0567739476001551 ↗
18. P. Kung, C. J. Sun, A. Saxler, H. Ohsato and M. Razeghi, J. Appl. Phys. 75 (1994) 4515.10.1063/1.355943 ↗
19. W. D. Kingery, H. K. Bowen and D. R. Uhlmann, “Introduction to Ceramics”, 2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1976).
20. Q. S. Paduano, D. W. Weyburne, J. Jasinski and Z. Liliental-Weber, J. Crystal Growth, 261 (2004) 259.10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2003.11.017 ↗