journal article·2019-04

Suppression of twinning mechanism on nanoscale: size effect in Cu–Ni–Al shape memory alloy

M. Vronka, M. Karlik, J. Vesely, J. Manak, O. Heczko

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 54· Issue 8
Publisher page

Abstract

In Cu–Ni–Al shape memory alloy, we observed a significant size effect on the twinning stress, i.e. the dependency of compression stress needed for twin-variant reorientation on sample size using in situ loading of micro- and nanoscale pillars in scanning and transmission electron microscopes. With decreasing dimensions of pillars, the twinning stress sharply increases following scaling power law with an exponent approximately n = − 2/3. For very small nanopillars, the projected twinning stress is so high that the nanopillars are deformed by plastic deformation instead of twinning. Our results shed light on some of the fundamental aspects of nanoscale behaviour of shape memory alloys which is important for applications in microelectromechanical systems.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Ullakko K, Huang JK, Kanter C, Kokorin VV, O’Handley RC (1996) Large magnetic-field-induced strains in Ni2MnGa single crystal. Appl Phys Lett 69:1966–196810.1063/1.117637 ↗
2. Heczko O, Scheerbaum N, Gutfleisch O (2009) Chapter 14: magnetic shape memory phenomena. In: Liu JP, Fullerton E, Gutfleisch O, Sellmyer DJ (eds) Nanoscale magnetic materials and applications. Springer, New York, pp 399–43910.1007/978-0-387-85600-1_14 ↗
3. Kohl M, Krevet B, Yeduru SR, Ezer Y, Sozinov A (2011) A novel foil actuator using the magnetic shape memory effect. Smart Mater Struct 20:09400910.1088/0964-1726/20/9/094009 ↗
4. Kohl M, Gueltig M, Pinneker V, Yin R, Wendler F, Krevet B (2014) Magnetic shape memory microactuators. Micromachines 5:1135–116010.3390/mi5041135 ↗
5. Wang Y, Huang Ch, Wu H, Liao X, Gao J, Wang D, Yang S, Song X (2017) Effect of martensitic structure on the magnetic field controlled damping effect in a Ni–Fe–Mn–Ga ferromagnetic shape memory alloy. J Mater Sci 52:12854–12860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1399-510.1007/s10853-017-1399-5 ↗
6. Feng J, Li Z, Jia Y, Yang B, Liu S, Zhao X, Li L, Zuo L (2018) Significant high-frequency electromagnetic wave absorption performance of Ni2+xMn1−xGa alloys. J Mater Sci 53:11779–11790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2440-z10.1007/s10853-018-2440-z ↗
7. Greer JR, De Hosson JTM (2011) Plasticity in small-sized metallic systems: intrinsic versus extrinsic size effect. Prog Mater Sci 56:654–72410.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.01.005 ↗
8. Dou R, Derby B (2009) A universal scaling law for the strength of metal micropillars and nanowires. Scr Mater 61:524–52710.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.05.012 ↗
9. Yu Q, Qi L, Chen K, Mishra RK, Li J, Minor AM (2012) The nanostructured origin of deformation twinning. Nano Lett 12:887–89210.1021/nl203937t ↗
10. Shi X, Cui L, Jiang D, Yu C, Guo F, Yu M, Ren Y, Liu Y (2014) Grain size effect on the R-phase transformation of nanocrystalline NiTi shape memory alloys. J Mater Sci 49:4643–4647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-014-8167-610.1007/s10853-014-8167-6 ↗
11. Kabirifar P, Chu K, Ren F, Sun Q (2018) Effects of grain size on compressive behavior of NiTi polycrystalline superelastic macro- and micropillars. Mater Lett 214:53–5510.1016/j.matlet.2017.11.069 ↗
12. Frick CP, Clark BG, Orso S, Schneider AS, Arzt E (2008) Size effect on strength an strain hardening of small-scale [1 1 1] nickel compression pillars. Mater Sci Eng: A 489:319–32910.1016/j.msea.2007.12.038 ↗
13. Frick CP, Clark BG, Schneider AS, Maaß R, Van Petegem S, Van Swygenhoven H (2010) On the plasticity of small-scale nickel–titanium shape memory alloys. Scr Mater 62:492–49510.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.12.023 ↗
14. Liu L, Ding X, Sun J, Li S, Salje EKH (2016) Breakdown of shape memory effect in bent Cu–Al–Ni nanopillars: when twin boundaries become stacking faults. Nano Lett 16:194–19810.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03483 ↗
15. Zhang HS, Komvopoulos K (2006) Nanoscale pseudoelasticity of single-crystal Cu–Al–Ni shape-memory alloy induced by cyclic nanoindentation. J Mater Sci 41:5021–5024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0124-6.pdf10.1007/s10853-006-0124-6 ↗
16. San Juan J, No ML, Schuh CA (2012) Superelastic cycling of Cu–Al–Ni shape memory alloy micropillars. Acta Mater 60:4093–410610.1016/j.actamat.2012.04.021 ↗
17. San Juan J, No ML, Schuh CA (2008) Superelasticity and shape memory in micro- and nanometer-scale pillars. Adv Mater 20:272–27810.1002/adma.200701527 ↗
18. San Juan J, No ML, Schuh CA (2011) Thermomechanical behavior at the nanoscale and size effects in shape memory alloys. J Matter Res 26:2461–246910.1557/jmr.2011.291 ↗
19. San Juan J, Gomez-Cortes JF, Lopez GA, Jiao C, No ML (2014) Long-term superelastic cycling at nano-scale in Cu–Al–Ni shape memory alloy micropillars. Appl Phys Lett 104:01190110.1063/1.4860951 ↗
20. Chen Y, Schuh CA (2011) Size effects in shape memory alloy microwires. Acta Mater 59:537–55310.1016/j.actamat.2010.09.057 ↗
21. Gómez-Cortés JF, Nó ML, López-Ferreño I, Hernández-Saz J, Molina SI, Chuvilin A, San Juan J (2017) Size effect and scaling power-law for superelasticity in shape-memory alloys at the nanoscale. Nat Nanotechnol 12:790–79610.1038/nnano.2017.91 ↗
22. Reinhold M, Kiener D, Knowlton WB, Dehm G, Müllner P (2009) Deformation twinning in Ni–Mn–Ga micropillars with 10 M martensite. J Appl Phys 106:05390610.1063/1.3211327 ↗
23. Musiienko D, Straka L, Klimša L, Saren A, Sozinov A, Heczko O, Ullakko K (2018) Giant magnetic-field-induced strain in Ni–Mn–Ga micropillars. Scr Mater 150:173–17610.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.03.020 ↗
24. Vronka M, Seiner H, Heczko O (2017) Temperature dependence of twinning stress: analogy between Cu–Ni–Al and Ni–Mn–Ga shape memory single crystals. Philos Mag 97:1479–149710.1080/14786435.2017.1303577 ↗
25. Shim S, Bei H, Miller MK, Pharr GM, George EP (2009) Effects of focused ion beam milling on the compressive behavior of directionally solidified micropillars and the nanoindentation response of an electropolished surface. Acta Mater 57:503–51010.1016/j.actamat.2008.09.033 ↗
26. San Juan J, No ML, Schuh CA (2009) Nanoscale shape-memory alloys for ultrahigh mechanical damping. Nat Nanotechnol 4:415–42510.1038/nnano.2009.142 ↗
27. Novák V, Šittner P, Ignácová S, Černoch T (2006) Transformation behavior of prism shape memory alloy single crystals. Mater Sci Eng: A 438:755–76210.1016/j.msea.2006.02.192 ↗
28. Ge Y, Vronka M, Vertat P, Karlik M, Hannula SP, Heczko O, Deformation twinning in 2H martensite in Cu–Ni–Al shape memory alloy, article in preparation
29. Christian JW, Mahajant S (1995) Deformation twinning. Prog Mater Sci 39:1–15710.1016/0079-6425(94)00007-7 ↗
30. Derlet PM, Maaß R (2015) Universal power-law strengthening in metals? Scr Mater 109:19–2210.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.07.009 ↗
31. Dou R, Derby B (2008) The strength of gold nanowire forests. Scr Mater 59:151–15410.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.02.046 ↗