journal article·2018-11Open access

Combined cerium oxide nanocapping and layer-by-layer coating of porous silicon containers for controlled drug release

Mahsa Sedighi, Fereshteh Rahimi, Ali Hossein Rezayan, Mohammad-Ali Shahbazi, Dominik Witzigmann, Jörg Huwyler

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 53· Issue 21

Abstract

Local drug release in close vicinity of solid tumors is a promising therapeutic approach in cancer therapy. Implantable drug delivery systems can be designed to achieve controlled and sustained drug release. In this study, ultrathin porous membranes of silicon wafer were employed as compatible drug reservoir models. An anticancer model drug, curcumin (CUR), was successfully loaded into porous silicon containers (8.94 ± 0.72% w/w), and then, cerium oxide nanocapping was performed on the open pores for drug protection and release rate prolongation. Next, layer-by-layer surface coating of the drug container with anionic (alginate) and cationic (chitosan) polymers rendered pH-responsivity to the device. The drug release profile was studied using reflectometric interference Fourier transform spectroscopy at different pH conditions. It was determined that faster decomposition of the polymeric layers and subsequent CUR release occur in acidic buffer (pH 5.5) compared to a neutral buffer. Various characterization studies, including dynamic light scattering, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, scanning and transmission electron microscopy, contact angle measurement, ultraviolet–visible spectroscopy, and X-ray powder diffraction revealed that our system has the required physicochemical properties to serve as a novel pH-sensitive drug delivery implant for cancer therapy.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Silicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence · Advanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis · Carbon and Quantum Dots Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. Santos A, Aw MS, Bariana M, Kumeria T, Wang Y, Losic D (2014) Drug-releasing implants: current progress, challenges and perspectives. J Mater Chem B 2:6157–6182. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4TB00548A10.1039/C4TB00548A ↗
2. Law CS, Santos A, Kumeria T, Losic D (2015) Engineered therapeutic-releasing nanoporous anodic alumina-aluminum wires with extended release of therapeutics. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:3846–3853. https://doi.org/10.1021/am509196310.1021/am5091963 ↗
3. Aw MS, Kurian M, Losic D (2013) Non-eroding drug-releasing implants with ordered nanoporous and nanotubular structures: concepts for controlling drug release. Biomater Sci 2:10–34. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3bm60196j10.1039/c3bm60196j ↗
4. Anglin EJ, Schwartz MP, Ng VP, Perelman LA, Sailor MJ (2004) Engineering the chemistry and nanostructure of porous silicon Fabry-Pérot films for loading and release of a steroid. Langmuir 20:11264–11269. https://doi.org/10.1021/la048105t10.1021/la048105t ↗
5. Canham LT, Stewart MP, Buriak JM, Reeves CL, Anderson M, Squire EK, Allcock P, Snow PA (2000) Derivatized porous silicon mirrors: implantable optical components with slow resorbability. Phys Status Solidi A 182:521–525. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-396x(200011)182:1<521::aid-pssa521>3.0.co;2-710.1002/1521-396X(200011)182:1<521::AID-PSSA521>3.0.CO;2-7 ↗
6. Li YY, Cunin F, Link JR et al (2003) Polymer replicas of photonic porous silicon for sensing and drug delivery applications. Science 299:2045–2047. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.108129810.1126/science.1081298 ↗
7. Shahbazi M-A, Hamidi M, Mäkilä EM et al (2013) The mechanisms of surface chemistry effects of mesoporous silicon nanoparticles on immunotoxicity and biocompatibility. Biomaterials 34:7776–7789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.06.05210.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.06.052 ↗
8. Irani YD, Tian Y, Wang M, Klebe S, McInnes SJ, Voelcker NH, Coffer JL, Williams KA (2015) A novel pressed porous silicon-polycaprolactone composite as a dual-purpose implant for the delivery of cells and drugs to the eye. Exp Eye Res 139:123–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2015.08.00710.1016/j.exer.2015.08.007 ↗
9. Low SP, Voelcker NH (2014) Biocompatibility of Porous Silicon. In: Canham L (ed) Handbook of porous silicon. Springer, Cham, pp 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04508-5_38-110.1007/978-3-319-04508-5_38-1 ↗
10. Irani YD, Klebe S, McInnes SJP, Jasieniak M, Voelcker NH, Williams KA (2017) Oral mucosal epithelial cells grown on porous silicon membrane for transfer to the rat eye. Sci Rep 7:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10793-110.1038/s41598-017-10793-1 ↗
11. Park J-H, Gu L, von Maltzahn G, Ruoslahti E, Bhatia SN, Sailor MJ (2009) Biodegradable luminescent porous silicon nanoparticles for in vivo applications. Nat Mater 8:331–336. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat239810.1038/nmat2398 ↗
12. McInnes SJP, Szili EJ, Al-Bataineh SA, Xu J, Alf ME, Gleason KK, Short RD, Voelcker NH (2012) Combination of iCVD and porous silicon for the development of a controlled drug delivery system. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4:3566–3574. https://doi.org/10.1021/am300621k10.1021/am300621k ↗
13. Sailor MJ (2011) Porous silicon in practice: preparation, characterization and applications. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA, Weinheim. https://doi.org/10.1002/978352764190110.1002/9783527641901 ↗
14. Correia A, Shahbazi M-A, Mäkilä E, Almeida S, Salonen J, Hirvonen J, Santos HA (2015) Cyclodextrin-modified porous silicon nanoparticles for efficient sustained drug delivery and proliferation inhibition of breast cancer cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:23197–23204. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b0703310.1021/acsami.5b07033 ↗
15. Lai C-Y, Trewyn BG, Jeftinija DM, Jeftinija K, Xu S, Jeftinija S, Lin VS-Y (2003) A mesoporous silica nanosphere-based carrier system with chemically removable CdS nanoparticle caps for stimuli-responsive controlled release of neurotransmitters and drug molecules. J Am Chem Soc 125:4451–4459. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja028650l10.1021/ja028650l ↗
16. Muhammad F, Guo M, Qi W, Sun F, Wang A, Guo Y, Zhu G (2011) pH-triggered controlled drug release from mesoporous silica nanoparticles via intracelluar dissolution of ZnO nanolids. J Am Chem Soc 133:8778–8781. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja200328s10.1021/ja200328s ↗
17. Muhammad F, Wang A, Qi W, Zhang S, Zhu G (2014) Intracellular antioxidants dissolve man-made antioxidant nanoparticles: using redox vulnerability of nanoceria to develop a responsive drug delivery system. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:19424–19433. https://doi.org/10.1021/am505536710.1021/am5055367 ↗
18. Sancenón F, Pascual L, Oroval M, Aznar E, Martínez-Máñez R (2015) Gated silica mesoporous materials in sensing applications. ChemistryOpen 4:418–437. https://doi.org/10.1002/open.20150005310.1002/open.201500053 ↗
19. Wang X, Cui M, Zhou H, Zhang S (2015) DNA-hybrid-gated functional mesoporous silica for sensitive DNA methyltransferase SERS detection. Chem Commun 51:13983–13985. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CC05463J10.1039/C5CC05463J ↗
20. Zhang B, Luo Z, Liu J, Ding X, Li J, Cai K (2014) Cytochrome c end-capped mesoporous silica nanoparticles as redox-responsive drug delivery vehicles for liver tumor-targeted triplex therapy in vitro and in vivo. J Control Release 192:192–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.06.03710.1016/j.jconrel.2014.06.037 ↗
21. Tamarov K, Xu W, Osminkina L et al (2016) Temperature responsive porous silicon nanoparticles for cancer therapy—spatiotemporal triggering through infrared and radiofrequency electromagnetic heating. J Controlled Release 241:220–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.09.02810.1016/j.jconrel.2016.09.028 ↗
22. Wang Y, Lu M, Zhu J, Tian S (2014) Wrapping DNA-gated mesoporous silica nanoparticles for quantitative monitoring of telomerase activity with glucometer readout. J Mater Chem B 2:5847–5853. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4TB00843J10.1039/C4TB00843J ↗
23. Wen J, Yang K, Liu F, Li H, Xu Y, Sun S (2017) Diverse gatekeepers for mesoporous silica nanoparticle based drug delivery systems. Chem Soc Rev 46:6024–6045. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CS00219J10.1039/C7CS00219J ↗
24. Babaei M, Abnous K, Taghdisi SM, Amel Farzad S, Peivandi MT, Ramezani M, Alibolandi M (2017) Synthesis of theranostic epithelial cell adhesion molecule targeted mesoporous silica nanoparticle with gold gatekeeper for hepatocellular carcinoma. Nanomedicine 12:1261–1279. https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm-2017-002810.2217/nnm-2017-0028 ↗
25. Sun X, Zhao Y, Lin VS-Y, Slowing II, Trewyn BG (2011) Luciferase and luciferin co-immobilized mesoporous silica nanoparticle materials for intracellular biocatalysis. J Am Chem Soc 133:18554–18557. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja208016810.1021/ja2080168 ↗
26. Yang X, He D, He X et al (2015) A dopamine responsive nano-container for the treatment of pheochromocytoma cells based on mesoporous silica nanoparticles capped with DNA-templated silver nanoparticles. J Mater Chem B 3:7135–7142. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TB01129A10.1039/C5TB01129A ↗
27. Bonanno LM, Segal E (2011) Nanostructured porous silicon-polymer-based hybrids: from biosensing to drug delivery. Nanomedicine 6:1755–1770. https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm.11.15310.2217/nnm.11.153 ↗
28. Feng W, Nie W, He C, Zhou X, Chen L, Qiu K, Wang W, Yin Z (2014) Effect of pH-responsive alginate/chitosan multilayers coating on delivery efficiency, cellular uptake and biodistribution of mesoporous silica nanoparticles based nanocarriers. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:8447–8460. https://doi.org/10.1021/am501337s10.1021/am501337s ↗
29. Krismastuti FSH, Bayat H, Voelcker NH, Schönherr H (2015) Real time monitoring of layer-by-layer polyelectrolyte deposition and bacterial enzyme detection in nanoporous anodized aluminum oxide. Anal Chem 87:3856–3863. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac504626m10.1021/ac504626m ↗
30. Lazzara TD, Lau KHA, Knoll W, Janshoff A, Steinem C (2012) Macromolecular shape and interactions in layer-by-layer assemblies within cylindrical nanopores, Beilstein. J Nanotechnol 3:475–484. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.3.5410.3762/bjnano.3.54 ↗
31. Segal E, Perelman LA, Cunin F, Di Renzo F, Devoisselle J-M, Li YY, Sailor MJ (2007) Confinement of thermoresponsive hydrogels in nanostructured porous silicon dioxide templates. Adv Funct Mater 17:1153–1162. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20060107710.1002/adfm.200601077 ↗
32. Shahbazi M-A, Almeida PV, Mäkilä E, Correia A, Ferreira MPA, Kaasalainen M, Salonen J, Hirvonen J, Santos HA (2014) Poly(methyl vinyl ether-alt-maleic acid)-functionalized porous silicon nanoparticles for enhanced stability and cellular internalization. Macromol Rapid Commun 35:624–629. https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.20130086810.1002/marc.201300868 ↗
33. Wu J, Sailor MJ (2009) Chitosan hydrogel-capped porous SiO2 as a pH responsive nano-valve for triggered release of insulin. Adv Funct Mater 19:733–741. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20080092110.1002/adfm.200800921 ↗
34. Feng W, Zhou X, He C, Qiu K, Nie W, Chen L, Wang H, Mo X, Zhang Y (2013) Polyelectrolyte multilayer functionalized mesoporous silica nanoparticles for pH-responsive drug delivery: layer thickness-dependent release profiles and biocompatibility. J Mater Chem B 1:5886–5898. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3tb21193b10.1039/c3tb21193b ↗
35. Witzigmann D, Sieber S, Porta F, Grossen P, Bieri A, Strelnikova N, Pfohl T, Prescianotto-Baschong C, Huwyler J (2015) Formation of lipid and polymer based gold nanohybrids using a nanoreactor approach. RSC Adv 5:74320–74328. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA13967H10.1039/C5RA13967H ↗
36. Pacholski C, Sartor M, Sailor MJ, Cunin F, Miskelly GM (2005) Biosensing using porous silicon double-layer interferometers: reflective interferometric Fourier transform spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc 127:11636–11645. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja051167110.1021/ja0511671 ↗
37. Wen J, Yang K, Xu Y, Li H, Liu F, Sun S (2016) Construction of A triple-stimuli-responsive system based on cerium oxide coated mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Sci Rep 6:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep3893110.1038/s41598-016-0001-8 ↗
38. Hirst SM, Karakoti AS, Tyler RD, Sriranganathan N, Seal S, Reilly CM (2009) Anti-inflammatory properties of cerium oxide nanoparticles. Small 5:2848–2856. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20090104810.1002/smll.200901048 ↗
39. Karakoti AS, Singh S, Kumar A, Malinska M, Kuchibhatla SVNT, Wozniak K, Self WT, Seal S (2009) PEGylated nanoceria as radical scavenger with tunable redox chemistry. J Am Chem Soc 131:14144–14145. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja905108710.1021/ja9051087 ↗
40. Kim CK, Kim T, Choi I-Y et al (2012) Ceria nanoparticles that can protect against ischemic stroke. Angew Chem Int Ed 51:11039–11043. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20120378010.1002/anie.201203780 ↗
41. Niu J, Azfer A, Rogers LM, Wang X, Kolattukudy PE (2007) Cardioprotective effects of cerium oxide nanoparticles in a transgenic murine model of cardiomyopathy. Cardiovasc Res 73:549–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardiores.2006.11.03110.1016/j.cardiores.2006.11.031 ↗
42. Perez JM, Asati A, Nath S, Kaittanis C (2008) Synthesis of biocompatible dextran-coated nanoceria with pH-dependent antioxidant properties. Small 4:552–556. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20070082410.1002/smll.200700824 ↗
43. Schubert D, Dargusch R, Raitano J, Chan S-W (2006) Cerium and yttrium oxide nanoparticles are neuroprotective. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 342:86–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.01.12910.1016/j.bbrc.2006.01.129 ↗
44. Pautler R, Kelly EY, Huang P-JJ, Cao J, Liu B, Liu J (2013) Attaching DNA to nanoceria: regulating oxidase activity and fluorescence quenching. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:6820–6825. https://doi.org/10.1021/am401886310.1021/am4018863 ↗
45. Yang XM, Zhong ZW, Diallo EM, Wang ZH, Yue WS (2014) Silicon wafer wettability and aging behaviors: impact on gold thin-film morphology. Mater Sci Semicond Process 26:25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2014.03.04410.1016/j.mssp.2014.03.044 ↗
46. Wang P-Y, Clements LR, Thissen H, Hung S-C, Cheng N-C, Tsai W-B, Voelcker HN (2012) Screening the attachment and spreading of bone marrow-derived and adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells on porous silicon gradients. RSC Adv 2:12857–12865. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ra21557h10.1039/c2ra21557h ↗
47. Santos A, Kumeria T, Losic D (2013) Optically optimized photoluminescent and interferometric biosensors based on nanoporous anodic alumina: a comparison. Anal Chem 85:7904–7911. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac401609c10.1021/ac401609c ↗
48. Pacholski C (2013) Photonic crystal sensors based on porous silicon. Sensors 13:4694–4713. https://doi.org/10.3390/s13040469410.3390/s130404694 ↗
49. Pacholski C, Sailor MJ (2007) Sensing with porous silicon double layers: a general approach for background suppression. Phys Status Solidi C 4:2088–2092. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssc.20067438110.1002/pssc.200674381 ↗
50. Pacholski C, Yu C, Miskelly GM, Godin D, Sailor MJ (2006) Reflective interferometric Fourier transform spectroscopy: a self-compensating label-free immunosensor using double-layers of porous SiO2. J Am Chem Soc 128:4250–4252. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja056702b10.1021/ja056702b ↗
51. Pacholski C, Perelman LA, VanNieuwenhze MS, Sailor MJ (2009) Small molecule detection by reflective interferometric Fourier transform spectroscopy (RIFTS). Phys Status Solidi A 206:1318–1321. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.20088107210.1002/pssa.200881072 ↗
52. Orosco MM, Pacholski C, Sailor MJ (2009) Real-time monitoring of enzyme activity in a mesoporous silicon double layer. Nat Nanotechnol 4:255–258. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2009.1110.1038/nnano.2009.11 ↗
53. Kumeria T, Gulati K, Santos A, Losic D (2013) Real-time and in situ drug release monitoring from nanoporous implants under dynamic flow conditions by reflectometric interference spectroscopy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:5436–5442. https://doi.org/10.1021/am401398410.1021/am4013984 ↗