journal article·2008-06

Toughening effect of maleic anhydride grafted linear low density polyethylene on linear low density polyethylene

Le-Ping Huang, Xing-Ping Zhou, Wei Cui, Xiao-Lin Xie, Shen-Yi Tong

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 43· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

The blend of linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE) and maleic-anhydride grafted LLDPE with the grafting degree of 1.3% and the gel content of 27.0% (designated as LLDPE/MA-PE) was melt-compounded. Their thermal, rheological, and mechanical properties were studied. The crystallization temperature and crystallization rate of LLDPE/MA-PE blends increase due to the nucleation of MA-PE, their crystallinity is between those of LLDPE and MA-PE due to the balance between the nucleation of MA-PE and simultaneously produced more defects. The addition of MA-PE increases the apparent viscosity of blend melts, but the shear-sensitivity of blends provides them with melting processing. Interestingly, the lamellar crystallites induced by MA-PE decrease the tensile yielding strength of LLDPE/MA-PE blends. During the impact fracture, the formation of oriented crystalline lamellae parallel to the crack front and perpendicular to the crack flank, leads to the deformation and microstriations in LLDPE/MA-PE blends. Subsequently, toughness of LLDPE/MA-PE blends is improved.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer crystallization and properties · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Kaminsky W (1992) In: Kricheldorf HR (ed) Handbook of polymer synthesis. Marcel Dekker, New York
2. Usami T, Gotoh Y, Takayama S (1986) Macromolecules 19:2722. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/ma00165a01010.1021/ma00165a010 ↗
3. Freed KF, Dudowicz J, Freed KF, Dudowicz J (1996) Macromolecules 29:625. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/ma951062q10.1021/ma951062q ↗
4. Bubeck RA (2002) Mater Sci Eng R 39:1. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-796X(02)00074-810.1016/S0927-796X(02)00074-8 ↗
5. Moad G (1999) Prog Polym Sci 24:81. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6700(98)00017-310.1016/S0079-6700(98)00017-3 ↗
6. Russell KE (2002) Prog Polym Sci 27:1007. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6700(02)00007-210.1016/S0079-6700(02)00007-2 ↗
7. Porejko S, Gabara W, Blazejew T, Lecka M (1967) J Polym Sci Part A-1 Polym Chem 7:164710.1002/pol.1969.150070708 ↗
8. Bray T, Damiris S, Grace A, Moad G, O’Shea M, Rizzardo E, Van Diepen G (1998) Macromol Symp 129:10910.1002/masy.19981290110 ↗
9. Gaylord NG, Mehta R (1988) J Polym Sci Part A Polym Chem 26:1189. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/pola.1988.08026041910.1002/pola.1988.080260419 ↗
10. Gaylord NG, Mehta R, Kumar V, Tazi M (1989) J Appl Polym Sci 38:359. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1989.07038021710.1002/app.1989.070380217 ↗
11. Gaylord NG, Mehta R, Mohan DR, Kumar V (1992) J Appl Polym Sci 44:1941. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1992.07044110910.1002/app.1992.070441109 ↗
12. Yang J, Yao Z, Shi D, Huang H, Wang Y, Yin J (2001) J Appl Polym Sci 79:535. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4628(20010118)79:3≤535::AID-APP170≥3.0.CO;2-L10.1002/1097-4628(20010118)79:3<535::AID-APP170>3.0.CO;2-L ↗
13. Hegazy ESA, Taher NH, Ebaid AR, Rabie AG, Kamal H (1990) J Appl Polym Sci 39:1029. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1990.07039050210.1002/app.1990.070390502 ↗
14. Samay G, Nagy T, White JL (1995) J Appl Polym Sci 56:1423. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1995.07056110510.1002/app.1995.070561105 ↗
15. Cha J, White JL (2002) Intern Polym Process 17:11510.3139/217.1687 ↗
16. Mahmoud GA (2007) J Appl Polym Sci 104:2769. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/app.2588310.1002/app.25883 ↗
17. Machado AV, van Duin M, Covas JA (2000) J Polym Sci Part A Polym Chem 38:3919. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-0518(20001101)38:21≤3919::AID-POLA90≥3.0.CO;2-L10.1002/1099-0518(20001101)38:21<3919::AID-POLA90>3.0.CO;2-L ↗
18. Machado AV, Covas JA, van Duin M (2001) Polymer 42:3649. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(00)00692-310.1016/S0032-3861(00)00692-3 ↗
19. Razavi Aghjeh MK, Nazockdast H, Assempour H (2006) J Appl Polym Sci 99:141. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/app.2187010.1002/app.21870 ↗
20. Sheshkali HRZ, Assempour H, Nazockdast H (2007) J Appl Polym Sci 105:1869. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/app.2539110.1002/app.25391 ↗
21. Utracki LA (1998) Commercial polymer blends. Chapman & Hall, London10.1007/978-1-4615-5789-0 ↗
22. Tang JW, Tong SY (2007) Sci Technol Chem Ind 15(3):5 (in Chinese)
23. Brydson JA (1981) Flow properties of polymer melts, 2nd edn. George Godwin, London
24. Run MT, Gao JG, Li ZT (2005) Thermochim Acta 429:171. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2005.03.00710.1016/j.tca.2005.03.007 ↗
25. Olabisi O, Robeson LM, Shaw MT (1979) Polymer–polymer miscibility. Academic Press, New York10.1016/B978-0-12-525050-4.50006-8 ↗
26. Alexander LE (1969) X-ray diffraction methods in polymer science. Wiley, New York
27. Till PH (1957) J Polym Sci 24:301. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.1957.120241061610.1002/pol.1957.1202410616 ↗
28. Lin L, Argon AS (1994) J Mater Sci 29:294. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0116248510.1007/BF01162485 ↗
29. Bartczak Z, Argon AS, Cohen RE, Kowalewski T (1999) Polymer 40:2367. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(98)00443-110.1016/S0032-3861(98)00443-1 ↗