Correlating yield response with molecular architecture in polymer glasses
Source abstract
Abstract
The yield response of nine architecturally different glassy networks is investigated under several stress states, strain rates, and temperatures, and correlations are made among them. Differences in molecular architecture are quantified through two proposed governing parameters; the glass transition temperature, T g, capturing network stiffness and the cohesive energy density, E c, reflecting network strength. Cohesive energy density is estimated using molecular modeling techniques and supported by solvent swelling experiments. The limits of the correlations made between molecular architecture and yield behavior are further studied with attempts to relate yielding in thermoplastic glasses and heterogeneous networks.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer crystallization and properties · Material Dynamics and Properties · Glass properties and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. www.freedoniagroup.com/Epoxy-Resins-In-North-America.html
2. Sternstein SS, Ongchin L (1969) ACS Polym Prep 10:1117
3. Sultan JN, McGarry FJ (1973) Polym Eng Sci 13:2910.1002/pen.760130105 ↗
4. Carapellucci LM, Yee AF (1986) Polym Eng Sci 26:92010.1002/pen.760261303 ↗
5. Kinloch AJ, Young RJ (1983) Fracture behavior of polymers. Applied Science Publishers, London, pp 116–117, 172
6. Robertson RE (1966) J Chem Phys 44:395010.1063/1.1726558 ↗
7. Duckett RA, Rabinowitz S, Ward IM (1970) J Mater Sci 9:90910.1007/BF00574864 ↗
8. Sha Y, Hui CY, Ruina A, Kramer EJ (1995) Macromolecules 28:245010.1021/ma00111a044 ↗
9. Baljon ARC, Robbins MO (2001) Macromolecules 34:420010.1021/ma0012393 ↗
10. Chui C, Boyce MC (1999) Macromolecules 32:379510.1021/ma9815399 ↗
11. Yang L, Srolovitz DJ, Yee AF (1997) J Chem Phys 107:439610.1063/1.474781 ↗
12. Rottler J, Robbins MO (2001) Phys Rev E 64:05180110.1103/PhysRevE.64.051801 ↗
13. Theodorou DN, Suter UW (1986) Macromolecules 19:13910.1021/ma00155a022 ↗
14. Hertzberg R (1989) Deformation and fracture mechanics of engineering materials, 3rd edn. John Wiley and Sons, New York
15. Crawford E, Lesser AJ (1998) J Polym Sci Part B: Pol Phys 36:137110.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(199806)36:8<1371::AID-POLB11>3.0.CO;2-4 ↗
16. Crawford E, Lesser AJ (1997) J Appl Polym Sci 66:38710.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19971010)66:2<387::AID-APP19>3.0.CO;2-V ↗
17. Graessley WW (1975) Macromolecules 8:18610.1021/ma60044a017 ↗
18. Flory PJ (1979) Polymer 20:131710.1016/0032-3861(79)90268-4 ↗
19. Lesser AJ, Calzia KJ (2004) J Polym Sci Part B: Pol Phys 42:205010.1002/polb.20090 ↗
20. Calzia KJ, Lesser AJ (2004) Abstr Pap Am Chem Soc 227:471-PMSE Part 2
21. Calzia KJ, Lesser AJ (2004) SPE ANTEC Tech Papers, 50
22. van Krevelen DW (1976) Properties of polymers, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 129–159
23. Allen MP, Tildesley DJ (1987) Computer simulations of liquids. Oxford University Press, Oxford
24. Kody RS, Lesser AJ (1997) J Mater Sci 32:563710.1023/A:1018693028394 ↗
25. Donnellan TM (1992) J Polym Eng Sci 32:41510.1002/pen.760320605 ↗
26. MacKinnon AJ (1995) J Polym Sci Part B: Pol Phys 58:2345
27. Cook WD (1999) Polymer 40:120910.1016/S0032-3861(98)00343-7 ↗
28. Sindt O, Perez, J (1996) Polymer 37:298910.1016/0032-3861(96)89396-7 ↗
29. Chaplin RP (1994) Polymer 35:75210.1016/0032-3861(94)90872-9 ↗
30. Ober CK, Kramer EJ (1998) Macromolecules, 31:40