Pore morphology in pressurized lignite coal: A small angle x-ray scattering investigation
Source abstract
Abstract
The morphological changes in lignite coal at two different pressures, using small angle x-ray scattering, have been investigated. All the scattering profiles are interpreted in terms of surface fractal morphology. It is observed that the surface fractal dimension does not change appreciably under the experimental pressure range, while the volume of micro-cracks and inter-particle pore space is reduced with increasing pressure. By and large, the constant value of the surface fractal dimension of all the specimens, as calculated from the scattering profiles, indicates that the roughness on the pore coal interface remains almost unaffected under the experimental pressure range. The validity of single scattering approximation for this experiment has also been confirmed by the observation of the identical nature of the small angle scattering profiles with respect to change of wave lengths, namely, 0.154 nm. (Cu Kα) and 0.072 nm (Mo Kα), of the probing radiation.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Coal Properties and Utilization · NMR spectroscopy and applications · Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (12)
Show source-provided references
1. A. Bendetti and S. Ciccariello, J. Phys. III France 6 (1996) 1479.
2. M. Kalliat, CY. Kwak and P. W. Schmidt, in New Approaches to Coal Chemistry, ACS Symp, Ser. No. 169, edited by B. D. Blaustein, B. C. Bockrath and S. Friedman (American Chemical Society Washington DC, 1981) p. 3.10.1021/bk-1981-0169.ch001 ↗
3. H. D. Bale, M. L. Carlson, M. Kalliat, C. Y. Kwak and P. W. Schmidt, in The Chemistry of Low-rank Coals, ACS Symp. Ser. No. 244, edited by H. Schobert (American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1984) p. 79.10.1021/bk-1984-0264.ch005 ↗
4. H. D. Bale and P. W. Schmidt, Phys Rev. Lett. 53 (1984) 594.
5. H. D. Bale, M. L. Carlson and H. H. Schobert, Fuel 65 (1986) 1185.10.1016/0016-2361(86)90227-9 ↗
6. J. S. Gethner, J. Appl. Phys. 59 (1986) 1068.10.1063/1.336543 ↗
7. Scott Nemmers, David K. Horne and Harold D. Bale, ibid. 68 (1990) 3178.10.1063/1.346366 ↗
8. C. M. Sorensen, C. Oh, P. W. Schmidt and T. P. Ricker, Phys. Rev. (E) 58 (1998) 4666.10.1103/PhysRevB.58.4666 ↗
9. P. W. Schmidt and R. Height, Acta Cryst. 13 ( 1960) 480.10.1107/S0365110X60001138 ↗
10. A. P. Radliski, C. J. Boreham, G. D. Wignall and J. S. Lin, Phys. Rev (B) 53 (1996) 14152.10.1103/PhysRevB.53.14152 ↗
11. Paul. W. Schmidt, J. Appl. Cryst. 24 (1991) 414.10.1107/S0021889891003400 ↗
12. S. Mazumder and A. Sequeira, Phys. Rev. B 41 (1990) 6272.10.1103/PhysRevB.41.6272 ↗