journal article·2008-10

Hierarchical modelling of a polymer matrix composite

Joel P. Foreman, Shabnam Behzadi, David Porter, Paul T. Curtis, Frank R. Jones

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 43· Issue 20
Publisher page

Abstract

A hierarchical modelling scheme to predict the properties of a polymer matrix composite is introduced. The stress–strain curves of amine-cured tetraglycidyl 4,4′-diaminodiphenylmethane (TGDDM) cured have been predicted using group interaction modelling (GIM). The GIM method, originally applied primarily to linear polymers, has been significantly extended to give accurate, consistent results for TGDDM, a highly crosslinked two-component matrix. The model predicts a complete range of temperature-dependent properties, from fundamental energy contributions, through engineering moduli to full stress–strain curves through yield. The predicted properties compare very well with experiment. Using the GIM-predicted TGDDM stress–strain curve, a 3D finite element model is used to obtain strain concentration factors (SCF) of fibres adjacent to a fibre break in a unidirectional (UD) composite. The strain distribution among the intact neighbouring fibres is clearly affected by the yielding mechanism in the resin matrix. A Monte Carlo simulation is carried out to predict the tensile failure strain of a single composite layer with the thickness equal to the fibre ineffective length. The effect of matrix shear yielding is introduced to the model through the SCF of surviving fibres adjacent to the fibre-break. The tensile failure strain of the composite is then predicted using a statistical model of a chain of composite layers.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Pham HQ, Marks MJ (2002) Epoxy resins. In: Encyclopedia of polymer science and technology. Wiley
2. Gupta A, Cizmecioglu M, Coulter D, Liang RH, Yavrouian A, Tsay FD, Moacanin J (1983) J Appl Polym Sci 28:1011. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/app. 1983.07028030910.1002/app.1983.070280309 ↗
3. Jones FR (2005) In: Soutis C, Beaumont PWR (eds) Multi-scale modelling of composite material systems: the art of predictive damage modelling. Woodhead publishing limited, Cambridge, p 528
4. Porter D (1995) Group interaction modelling of polymer properties. Marcel Dekker, New York
5. Foreman JP, Porter D, Behzadi S, Travis KP, Jones FR (2006) J Mater Sci 41:6631. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0202-910.1007/s10853-006-0202-9 ↗
6. Gumen VR, Jones FR, Attwood D (2001) Polymer 42:5717. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(00)00930-710.1016/S0032-3861(00)00930-7 ↗
7. Liu HP, Uhlherr A, Bannister MK (2004) Polymer 45:2051. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2004.01.00810.1016/j.polymer.2004.01.008 ↗
8. Porter D, Vollrath F, Shao Z (2005) Eur Phys J E 16:199. doi: https://doi.org/10.1140/epje/e2005-00021-210.1140/epje/e2005-00021-2 ↗
9. Vollrath F, Porter D (2006) Appl Phys A-Mater Sci Process 82:205. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-005-3437-410.1007/s00339-005-3437-4 ↗
10. Rosen BW (1964) AIAA J 2:198510.2514/3.2699 ↗
11. Zweben C (1968) AIAA J 6:232510.2514/3.4990 ↗
12. Zweben C, Rosen W (1970) J Mech Phys Solids 18:189. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(70)90023-210.1016/0022-5096(70)90023-2 ↗
13. Lane R, Hayes SA, Jones FR (2001) Compos Sci Technol 61:565. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00229-310.1016/S0266-3538(00)00229-3 ↗
14. Behzadi S, Curtis PT, Jones FR (2007) Proceedings of ICCM-16, Kyoto
15. Hedgepeth JM, van Dyke P (1967) J Compos Mater 1:29410.1177/002199836700100305 ↗
16. Wada A, Fukuda H (1999) Compos Sci Technol 59:89. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00052-910.1016/S0266-3538(98)00052-9 ↗
17. LienKamp M, Schwartz P (1993) Compos Sci Technol 46:139. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-3538(93)90169-H10.1016/0266-3538(93)90169-H ↗
18. Fukuda H, Kawata K (1977) Fibre Sci Technol 10:53. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0015-0568(77)90028-810.1016/0015-0568(77)90028-8 ↗
19. Manders PW, Bader MG, Chou TW (1982) Fibre Sci Technol 17:183. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0015-0568(82)90003-310.1016/0015-0568(82)90003-3 ↗
20. Ochiai S, Osamura K (1988) J of Mater Sci 23:886. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0115398410.1007/BF01153984 ↗
21. Curtin WA, Takeda N (1998) J Compos Mater 32:206010.1177/002199839803202204 ↗
22. Curtis PT (1986) Compos Sci Technol 27:63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-3538(86)90063-110.1016/0266-3538(86)90063-1 ↗
23. Williams JG (1979) J Appl Polym Sci 23:3433. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1979.07023120110.1002/app.1979.070231201 ↗
24. ANSYS Inc.: reference manual, 2006
25. Nedele MR (1996) In: Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol
26. Box GEP, Muller ME (1958) Ann Math Stat 29:610. doi: https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/117770664510.1214/aoms/1177706645 ↗
27. Bader MG, Priest AM (1982) ICCM-IV, Tokyo, pp 1159–1136
28. Tarasov VV (1965) Russ J Phys Chem 39:1109
29. Tarasov VV (1953) Zh Fiz Khim 27:1430
30. Kozey VV, Kumar S (1994) J Mater Res 9:2717. doi: https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.1994.271710.1557/JMR.1994.2717 ↗
31. Phoenix SL, Schwartz P, Robinson HH (1988) Compos Sci Technol 32:81. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-3538(88)90001-210.1016/0266-3538(88)90001-2 ↗
32. Behzadi S (2006) PhD thesis, Department of Engineering Materials, University of Sheffield, Sheffield
33. Caballero-Martinez MI (2004) PhD thesis, Department of Engineering Materials, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, p 217
34. Behzadi S, Jones FR (2005) J Macromol Sci-Part B: Phys 44:99310.1080/00222340500393881 ↗