Influence of heat treatment and fiber orientation on the damage threshold and the fracture behavior of Nextel fiber-reinforced Mullite-SiOC matrix composites analysed by acoustic emission monitoring
Source abstract
Abstract
In the present study, we elucidate the influence of oxidative heat exposures at 1000 and 1200 °C on an alumina fiber-reinforced polymer-derived ceramic matrix composite containing small residual amounts of carbon. Therefore, we investigated the flexural performance and fracture toughness of on- (0°/90°) and off-axis (45°) reinforced samples. Acoustic emission was used to monitor the internal damage and its progression during loading. At 1000 °C, a moderate reduction of strength and fracture toughness is found while after exposure to 1200 °C a dramatic decrease down to 50 % is observed. For all composites, a reduction of the damaged volume was found after heat treatments indicating a decrease of crack deflection. However, especially at 1000 °C, composites reinforced in 0°/90° direction seemed to be more affected, as no detrimental effect on the mechanical performance was found for the 45° composites. Remarkably, the oxidation-induced silica formation increases the absolute and relative damage thresholds of all composites. A Griffith-like linear relationship between strength and toughness is found. These findings are pivotal for designing and engineering next generation CMCs toward long-term applications.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Advanced materials and composites · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Motz G, Schmidt S, Beyer S (2008) The Pip-Process: Precursor Properties and Applications. Ceramic Matrix Composites. Wiley-VCH, Germany
2. Jones R, Szweda A, Petrak D (1999) Polymer derived ceramic matrix composites. Compos Part A 30(4):569–575. doi: 10.1016/s1359-835x(98)00151-110.1016/S1359-835X(98)00151-1 ↗
3. Colombo P, Mera G, Riedel R, Sorarù GD (2010) Polymer-derived ceramics: 40 years of research and innovation in advanced ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 93(7):1805–1837. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.03876.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.03876.x ↗
4. Narisawa M (2010) Silicone resin applications for ceramic precursors and composites. Materials 3(6):3518–3536. doi: 10.3390/ma306351810.3390/ma3063518 ↗
5. Gerendás M, Cadoret Y, Wilhelmi C, Machry T, Knoche R, Behrendt T, Aumeier T, Denis S, Göring J, Koch D, Tushtev K Improvement of Oxide/Oxide Cmc and Development of Combustor and Turbine Components in the Hipoc Program. In: ASME Turbo Expo 2011, Vancouver, Kanada, 06.-10- Juni 2011 2011. ASME, pp 4546010.1115/GT2011-45460 ↗
6. Gerendás M, Wilhelmi C, Machry T, Knoche R, Werth E, Behrendt T, Koch D, Hofmann S, Göring J, Tushtev K, Volkmann E (2013) Development and Validation of Oxide/Oxide Cmc Combustors within the Hipoc Program. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2013: Power for Land, Sea Air, San Antonio, Texas, USA, 3–7 June 201310.1115/GT2013-94679 ↗
7. Fischer WP, Ritter H (2012) Ground and Flight Qualification of an Oxide Ceramic Windward-Side Tps. In: 42nd International Conference on Environmental Systems. International Conference on Environmental Systems (Ices). American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. doi: 10.2514/6.2012-351810.2514/6.2012-3518 ↗
8. Knoche R, Werth E, Weth M, García JG, Wilhelmi C, Gerendás M Design and Development Approach for Gas Turbine Combustion Chambers Made of Oxide Ceramic Matrix Composites. In: Singh D, Salem J, Widjaja S (eds) ICACC2011 Cocoa/Daytona Beach Conference, 2011. Mechanical Properties and Performance of Engineering Ceramics and Composites VI: Ceramic Engineering and Science Proceedings. Wiley Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA. doi: 10.1002/9781118095355.ch710.1002/9781118095355.ch7 ↗
9. Volkmann E, Lima Evangelista L, Tushtev K, Koch D, Wilhelmi C, Rezwan K (2013) Oxidation-induced microstructural changes of a polymer-derived nextel™ 610 ceramic composite and impact on the mechanical performance. J Mater Sci 49(2):710–719. doi: 10.1007/s10853-013-7752-410.1007/s10853-013-7752-4 ↗
10. Hoenig S, Klatt E, Frieß M, Martin C, Naji I, Koch D (2012) Influence of fiber fabric density and matrix fillers as well as fiber coating on the properties of oxipol materials. Mech Prop Perform Eng Ceram Compos VII 570:195
11. Volkmann E, Tushtev K, Koch D, Wilhelmi C, Göring J, Rezwan K (2014) Assessment of Three Oxide/Oxide Ceramic Matrix Composites: Mechanical Performance and Longterm Stability. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing submitted10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.09.013 ↗
12. Ríos-Soberanis CR (2011) Acoustic emission technique, an overview as a characterization tool in materials science. J Appl Res Technol 9(3):367–379
13. Morscher GN, Yun HM, DiCarlo JA (2007) In-plane cracking behavior and ultimate strength for 2d woven and braided melt-infiltrated sic/sic composites tensile loaded in off-axis fiber directions. J Am Ceram Soc 90(10):3185–3193. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.01887.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.01887.x ↗
14. Luo JJ, Wooh SC, Daniel IM (1995) Acoustic-emission study of failure mechanisms in ceramic-matrix composite under longitudinal tensile loading. J Compos Mater 29(15):1946–196110.1177/002199839502901501 ↗
15. Surgeon M, Vanswijgenhoven E, Wevers M, Van Der Biest O (1997) Acoustic emission during tensile testing of sic-fibre-reinforced bmas glass-ceramic composites. Compos Part A 28(5):473–480. doi: 10.1016/S1359-835X(96)00147-910.1016/S1359-835X(96)00147-9 ↗
16. Kostopoulos V, Loutas TH, Kontsos A, Sotiriadis G, Pappas YZ (2003) On the identification of the failure mechanisms in oxide/oxide composites using acoustic emission. NDT and E Int 36(8):571–58010.1016/S0963-8695(03)00068-9 ↗
17. Kim RY, Pagano NJ (1991) Crack initiation in unidirectional brittle-matrix composites. J Am Ceram Soc 74(5):1082–109010.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb04346.x ↗
18. Hamstad M (1986) A review: acoustic emission, a tool for composite-materials studies. Exp Mech 26(1):7–1310.1007/BF02319949 ↗
19. Zok FW, Levi CG (2001) Mechanical properties of porous-matrix ceramic composites. Adv Eng Mater 3(1–2):15–2310.1002/1527-2648(200101)3:1/2<15::AID-ADEM15>3.0.CO;2-A ↗
20. Keller K, Jefferson G, Kerans R (2005) Oxide–Oxide Composites. In: Bansal N (ed) Handbook of Ceramic Composites. Springer US, pp 377–421. doi: 10.1007/0-387-23986-3_1610.1007/0-387-23986-3_16 ↗
21. Siegert GT, Ruggles-Wrenn MB, Baek SS Effects of Environment on Creep Behavior of an Oxide–Oxide Ceramic Composite with ±45° Fiber Orientation at 1200°C. In: Lara-Curio E (ed) Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Advanced Ceramics and Composites, Daytona Beach, 2007. The American Ceramic Society, pp 163–17710.1002/9780470339497.ch16 ↗
22. Carelli EAV, Fujita H, Yang JY, Zok FW (2002) Effects of thermal aging on the mechanical properties of a porous-matrix ceramic composite. J Am Ceram Soc 85(3):595–602. doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2002.tb00138.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.2002.tb00138.x ↗
23. Keller KA, Mah T-I, Parthasarathy TA, Cooke CM (2000) Fugitive interfacial carbon coatings for oxide/oxide composites. J Am Ceram Soc 83(2):329–33610.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01194.x ↗
24. Weaver JH, Yang J, Zok FW (2008) Control of interface properties in oxide composites via fugitive coatings. J Am Ceram Soc 91(12):4003–4008. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02746.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02746.x ↗
25. ASTM (2003) Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Advanced Ceramics at Ambient Temperature. vol C1161–02c
26. Kuntz M (1996) Rißwiderstand Keramischer Faserverbundwerkstoffe. Berichte Aus Der Werkstofftechnik. Shaker Verlag, Aachen
27. Zok F, Sbaizero O, Hom CL, Evans AG (1991) Mode I fracture resistance of a laminated fiber-reinforced ceramic. J Am Ceram Soc 74(1):187–193. doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb07316.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb07316.x ↗
28. Lewis D, Bulik C, Shadwell D (1985) Standardized testing of refractory matrix/ceramic fiber composites. Ceram Eng Sci Proc 8(DK086):507–52310.1002/9780470320280.ch3 ↗
29. Munz D, Fett T (1999) Ceramics—Mechanical Properties, Failure Behaviour, Materials Selection. vol B 125. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo10.1007/978-3-642-58407-7_7 ↗
30. ASTM (2012) Standard Guide for Mounting Piezoelectric Acoustic Emission Sensors. vol ASTM E650/E650-12
31. Morscher GN (2004) Stress-dependent matrix cracking in 2d woven sic-fiber reinforced melt-infiltrated sic matrix composites. Compos Sci Technol 64(9):1311–131910.1016/j.compscitech.2003.10.022 ↗
32. Wevers M (1997) Listening to the sound of materials: acoustic emission for the analysis of material behaviour. NDT and E Int 30(2):99–10610.1016/S0963-8695(96)00051-5 ↗
33. Peters PWM, Daniels B, Clemens F, Vogel WD (2000) Mechanical characterisation of mullite-based ceramic matrix composites at test temperatures up to 1200 °C. J Eur Ceram Soc 20(5):531–53510.1016/S0955-2219(99)00250-2 ↗
34. Lamon J (2001) A micromechanics-based approach to the mechanical behavior of brittle-matrix composites. Compos Sci Technol 61(15):2259–227210.1016/S0266-3538(01)00120-8 ↗
35. Pampuch R, Sobierski L Reliability Vs. Fracture Toughness of Cmc Featuring Long-Crack Toughness. In: Heinrich JG, Aneziris CG (eds) 10th International Conference of the European Ceramic Society, Berlin, 2007. Göller Verlag Gmbh, Baden Baden, pp 1131–1134
36. Munro RG, Freiman SW (1999) Correlation of fracture toughness and strength. J Am Ceram Soc 82(8):2246–2248. doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb02069.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb02069.x ↗
37. Munro RG, Freiman S, Baker TL (1998) Fracture Toughness data for brittle materials. NASA (19980201181)10.6028/NIST.IR.6153 ↗
38. He MY, Hutchinson JW (1989) Crack deflection at an interface between dissimilar elastic materials. Int J Solids Struct 25(9):1053–106710.1016/0020-7683(89)90021-8 ↗
39. Evans AG, Marshall DB (1989) The mechanical behavior of ceramic matrix composites. Acta Metall Mater 37:2567–258310.1016/0001-6160(89)90291-5 ↗
40. Curtin WA (1991) Theory of mechanical properties of ceramic-matrix composites. J Am Ceram Soc 74(11):2837–284510.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb06852.x ↗
41. Hild F, Domergue JM, Leckie FA, Evans AG (1994) Tensile and flexural ultimate strength of fiber-reinforced ceramic-matrix composites. Int J Solids Struct 31(7):1035–104510.1016/0020-7683(94)90010-8 ↗
42. Haque A, Ahmed L, Ramasetty A (2005) Stress concentrations and notch sensitivity in woven ceramic matrix composites containing a circular hole—an experimental, analytical, and finite element study. J Am Ceram Soc 88(8):2195–2201. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00404.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00404.x ↗
43. Keith WP, Kedward KT (1997) Notched strength of ceramic-matrix composites. Compos Sci Technol 57(6):631–635. doi: 10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00007-910.1016/S0266-3538(97)00007-9 ↗