journal article·2005-01

Predicting fatigue S-N (stress-number of cycles to fail) behavior of reinforced plastics using fracture mechanics theory

M. G. Wyzgoski, G. E. Novak

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 40· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

The present study describes a model to predict fatigue S-N behavior, and thus fatigue life, of glass fiber reinforced thermoplastics by using a fracture mechanics approach. The model assumes the presence of an inherent initial flaw in the molded plastic parts and thus ignores crack initiation contributions. In this paper we describe how fatigue crack propagation rate data were obtained for the same three glass fiber reinforced plastics whose S-N behavior was previously described in detail. Using the measured constants from the crack growth data, and corresponding S-N data for uncracked specimens, the validity of the single initial flaw hypothesis was evaluated. From the analyzed results it is concluded that accurate S-N predictions are possible using this simple fracture mechanics model for some materials. The best results are obtained for glass filled polyamide, PA (nylon 66) and polycarbonate, PC; however, with polybutylene terephthalate, PBT, predictions were poor. It is also shown that S-N data for different glass fiber orientations can be predicted by combining the single flaw model with predicted fatigue crack propagation rate measurements. The latter are calculated from a generalized crack growth rate expression utilizing the strain energy release rate fracture mechanics parameter, which was previously described.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Composite Material Mechanics · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. N. E. Dowling, ?Mechanical Behavior of Materials? (Prentice Hall, 1993).
2. ?SAE Fatigue Design Handbook,? AE-10, 2nd ed., 1988.
3. R. W. Hertzberg and J. A. Manson, ?Fatigue of Engineering Plastics? (Academic Press, 1980).
4. K. L. Reifsnider (ed.), ?Fatigue of Composite Materials? (Elsevier, 1991).
5. D. C. Martin, G. E. Novak and M. G. Wyzgoski, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 37 (1989) 3029.10.1002/app.1989.070371019 ↗
6. M. G. Wyzgoski and G. E. Novak, J. Mater. Sci. 26 (1991) 6314.10.1007/BF02387810 ↗
7. M. G. Wyzgoski, G. E. Novak and D. L. Simon, ibid. 25 (1990) 4501.10.1007/BF00581115 ↗
8. A. Pegoretti and T. Ricco, Comp. Sci. Techn. 59 (1999) 1055.10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00143-2 ↗
9. J. A. Krohn, G. E. Novak and M. G. Wyzgoski, Paper # 455, Society of Plastics Engineers ANTEC 2001.
10. M. G. Wyzgoski, J. A. Krohn and G. E. Novak, Polym. Comp., submitted for publication, 2003.
11. A. J. Kinloch and R. J. Young, ?Fracture Behavior of Polymers? (Applied Science, 1983).
12. J. G. Williams, ?Fracture Mechanics of Polymers? (Ellis Norwood Lmt., 1984).
13. K. Friedrich (ed.), ?Composite Materials Series, 6: Application of Fracture Mechanics to Composite Materials? (Elsevier, 1989).
14. D. R. Moore, A. Pavan and J. G. Williams (eds.), ESIS Publication 28: ?Fracture Mechanics Testing for Polymers, Adhesives and Composites? (Elsevier, 2001).
15. Y. Murakami (ed.), ?Stress Intensity Factors Handbook? (Pergamon Press, 1987).
16. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 8.03, D5045-99, 331.
17. B. E. Ver Weyst, C. L. Tucker, P. H. Foss and J. F. O?Gara, Intern. Polym. Proc. 14 (1999) 409.10.3139/217.1568 ↗
18. M. G. Wyzgoski and G. E. Novak, Polym. Comp. 16 (1995) 38.10.1002/pc.750160107 ↗
19. M. G. Wyzgoski and G. E. Novak, in ?Ninth Intern. Conf., Deformation Yield and Fracture,? (Cambridge, UK, 1994) p. 39/1.