The relationship between the fracture toughness and grain boundary characteristics in hot-dip galvanized zinc coatings
Source abstract
Abstract
This publication presents an experimental study on the relation between the grain boundary (GB) characteristics and the intergranular cracking resistance in a hot dip zinc coating. The cracking was studied using in situ tensile tests in a scanning electron microscope on small tensile samples of a hot dip galvanized steel sheet. In situ testing offered a series of advantages like monitoring the kinematical evolution of cracking without unloading, or making micrographs and OIM imaging on the same area of the tensile sample. The grain boundaries were classified into random and special boundaries (respectively Low angle boundaries and Coincidence site lattice—CSL boundaries). These special boundaries which account for 3.5% of the whole boundaries clearly show better cracking resistance than the random boundaries. The only special boundaries which present cracking failure are in an orientation with their normal direction close to the tensile direction, i.e. submitted to a maximum effective stress. The grain boundaries characteristics are obtained from EBSD individual orientation measurements.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Concrete Corrosion and Durability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Dunham KJ (2002) Metal Finish 100:2010.1016/S0026-0576(02)80746-2 ↗
2. Tzimas E, Papadimitriou G (2001) Technology 145:176
3. Lazik S, Esling C, Philippe MJ, Wegria J, Dubois M (1996) TMS 28:35
4. Parisot R, Forest S, Gourgues AF, Pineau A, Mareuse D (2000) Comp Mater Sci 19:18910.1016/S0927-0256(00)00155-5 ↗
5. Lim LC, Watanabe T (1990) Acta Metall Mater 38:250710.1016/0956-7151(90)90262-F ↗
6. Watanabe T, Tsurekawa S (1999) Acta Metall Mater 47:417110.1016/S1359-6454(99)00275-X ↗
7. Watanabe T, Yamada M, Shima S, Karashima S (1979) Phil Mag A 40(5): 66710.1080/01418617908234867 ↗
8. Wang G, Zuo L, Esling C (2002) Phil Mag A 12:249910.1080/01418610208240049 ↗
9. Beaujean I (1993) Ph.D. Thesis, University of Metz, Metz
10. Gaignard S, Lazik S, Lietzau J, Wegria J, Dubois M, Philippe MJ, Esling C (1999) TMS 34:147
11. Bunge HJ (1993) Texture analysis in material science, Cuvillier Verlag, Göttingen
12. Palumbo G, Aust KT, Lehockey EM, Erb U, Lin P (1998) Scripta Mat 38(11):168510.1016/S1359-6462(98)00077-3 ↗
13. Gertsman VY, Zhilyaev AP, Szpunar JA (1997) Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 5:3510.1088/0965-0393/5/1/003 ↗
14. Brandon DG (1966) Acta Metall 14:147910.1016/0001-6160(66)90168-4 ↗
15. Pan Y, Adams BL, Olson T, Panayotou N (1996) Acta Metall 44:4685
16. Read WT, Shockley W (1950) Phys Rev 78:27510.1103/PhysRev.78.275 ↗
17. Bonnet R, Cousineau E, Warrington DH (1981) Acta Cryst A37:18410.1107/S0567739481000466 ↗
18. Heinz A, Neumann P (1991) Acta Cryst. A47:78010.1107/S0108767391006864 ↗
19. Humbert M, Wagner F, Moustafid H, Esling C (1995) J Appl Cryst 28:57110.1107/S0021889895004067 ↗
20. Zuo L, Watanabe T, Esling C (1994) Z Metallkde 85:554
21. Kim T, Hong KT, Lee KS (2003) Intermetallics 11:3310.1016/S0966-9795(02)00167-X ↗
22. Zuo L, Esling C (1995) Scripta Metall Mater 32(6):93710.1016/0956-716X(95)93228-V ↗
23. Mackenzie JK, Thomson MJ (1957) Biometrika 44:20510.1093/biomet/44.1-2.205 ↗
24. Jaffrey D, Browne JD, Howard TJ (1980) Metall Trans B 11:63110.1007/BF02670143 ↗
25. Known JQ, Demura M, Hirano T (2003) Acta Materialia 51:250510.1016/S1359-6454(03)00047-8 ↗
26. Lee DS, Ryoo HS, Hwang SK (2003) Mater Sci Eng A354:10610.1016/S0921-5093(02)00919-X ↗
27. Watanabe T, Kimura SI, Karashima S (1984) Phil Mag A 49(6):84510.1080/01418618408236566 ↗